IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16905-d1005341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Third Half: A Pilot Study Using Evidence-Based Psychological Strategies to Promote Well-Being among Doctoral Students

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Muro

    (Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
    Serra Hunter Programme, Generalitat de Catalunya, 08017 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Iván Bonilla

    (Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
    Sports Research Institute, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain)

  • Claudia Tejada-Gallardo

    (Department of Psychology, University of Lleida, 25001 Lleida, Spain)

  • María Paola Jiménez-Villamizar

    (Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
    Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta 470001, Colombia)

  • Ramon Cladellas

    (Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
    Sports Research Institute, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain)

  • Antoni Sanz

    (Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
    Sports Research Institute, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain)

  • Miquel Torregrossa

    (Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
    Sports Research Institute, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain)

Abstract

Over the last few years, various studies have reported decreasing well-being levels among doctoral students, who show a higher risk of suffering from psychological distress than the general population. Accordingly, European policies in higher education encourage well-being promotion programs among doctoral studies to enhance young researchers’ well-being. However, programs using evidence-based practices for well-being promotion are not yet generalised in public universities. The present study describes a pilot experience designed to evaluate the efficacy of a well-being program among doctoral candidates of a public European university, the Autonomous University of Barcelona. 25 doctoral students (67% women) participated in a pre-post study consisting of six sessions of 3 h each and structured by the big five criteria coming from evidence-based practices for well-being promotion: outdoor green spaces exposure, physical activity, gamification, mentoring, positive and coaching psychology techniques. Results showed how participants experienced significant increases in several indicators of emotional well-being and decreased psychological distress after the Third Half program. These positive pilot results encourage further research and future replications to assess the impact of this evidence-based psychological program among the academic community. Results also lead the way towards the creation of healthier academic workplaces by implementing cost-effective interventions that improve researchers’ psychosocial support and their overall well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Muro & Iván Bonilla & Claudia Tejada-Gallardo & María Paola Jiménez-Villamizar & Ramon Cladellas & Antoni Sanz & Miquel Torregrossa, 2022. "The Third Half: A Pilot Study Using Evidence-Based Psychological Strategies to Promote Well-Being among Doctoral Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16905-:d:1005341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16905/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16905/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Levecque, Katia & Anseel, Frederik & De Beuckelaer, Alain & Van der Heyden, Johan & Gisle, Lydia, 2017. "Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 868-879.
    2. Ana Manzano-León & Pablo Camacho-Lazarraga & Miguel A. Guerrero & Laura Guerrero-Puerta & José M. Aguilar-Parra & Rubén Trigueros & Antonio Alias, 2021. "Between Level Up and Game Over: A Systematic Literature Review of Gamification in Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Chris Woolston, 2019. "PhDs: the tortuous truth," Nature, Nature, vol. 575(7782), pages 403-406, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Argyro Anna Kanelli & Maria Lydia Vardaka & Chrisovaladis Malesios & Zainab Jamidu Katima & Olga-Ioanna Kalantzi, 2024. "Can Campus Green Spaces Be Restorative? A Case Study from Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chiara Corvino & Amalia De Leo & Miriam Parise & Giulia Buscicchio, 2022. "Organizational Well-Being of Italian Doctoral Students: Is Academia Sustainable When It Comes to Gender Equality?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Aljoscha Dreisoerner & Anamarija Klaic & Rolf Dick & Nina M. Junker, 2023. "Self-Compassion as a Means to Improve Job-Related Well-Being in Academia," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 409-428, February.
    3. Fabian Scheidegger & Andre Briviba & Bruno S. Frey, 2023. "Behind the curtains of academic publishing: strategic responses of economists and business scholars," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(8), pages 4765-4790, August.
    4. Sara M. González-Betancor & Pablo Dorta-González, 2020. "Risk of Interruption of Doctoral Studies and Mental Health in PhD Students," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-12, October.
    5. Jing Jia & Nelson C. Y. Yeung, 2023. "“My Cross-Border PhD Journey”: A Qualitative Study on the Educational and Life Challenges of Mainland Chinese PhD Students in Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Hayter, Christopher S. & Parker, Marla A., 2019. "Factors that influence the transition of university postdocs to non-academic scientific careers: An exploratory study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 556-570.
    7. Pawe³ A. Atroszko & Bartosz Atroszko, 2020. "The Costs of Work-Addicted Managers in Organizations: Towards Integrating Clinical and Organizational Frameworks," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(Special 1), pages 1265-1265, November.
    8. Nannan Zhang & Fengxin Sun & Yongsheng Zhu & Qinglan Zheng & Changjun Jia & Yupeng Mao & Bing Liu, 2023. "Effects of Fitness Dance and Funny Running on Anxiety of Female Ph.D. Candidates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-11, January.
    9. Nigel Golden & Kadambari Devarajan & Cathleen Balantic & Joseph Drake & Michael T Hallworth & Toni Lyn Morelli, 2021. "Ten simple rules for productive lab meetings," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-13, May.
    10. Pimentel, Erica & Cho, Charles H. & Bothello, Joel, 2023. "The blind spots of interdisciplinarity in addressing grand challenges," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    11. Kyle R. Myers & Wei Yang Tham & Jerry Thursby & Marie Thursby & Nina Cohodes & Karim Lakhani & Rachel Mural & Yilun Xu, 2023. "New Facts and Data about Professors and their Research," Papers 2312.01442, arXiv.org.
    12. Elena Riva & Rebecca Freeman & Lauren Schrock & Victoria Jelicic & Cameron-Tosh Ozer & Ruth Caleb, 2020. "Student Wellbeing in the Teaching and Learning Environment: A Study Exploring Student and Staff Perspectives," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(4), pages 103-103, December.
    13. Renata Pereira Oliveira & Cristina Gomes de Souza & Augusto da Cunha Reis & Wallice Medeiros de Souza, 2021. "Gamification in E-Learning and Sustainability: A Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Kevin M. Kniffin & Andrew S. Hanks & Xuechao Qian & Bo Wang & Bruce A. Weinberg, 2020. "Dissertators with Distantly Related Foci Face Divergent Near-Term Outcomes," NBER Working Papers 27825, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Ben Purvis & Hannah Keding & Ashley Lewis & Phil Northall, 2023. "Critical reflections of postgraduate researchers on a collaborative interdisciplinary research project," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Antonio Torralba-Burrial & Eduardo Dopico, 2023. "Promoting the Sustainability of Artisanal Fishing through Environmental Education with Game-Based Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    17. Mohamed Mousa & Monowar Mahmood, 2023. "Mental Illness of Management Educators: Does Holding Multiple Academic Jobs Play a Role? A Qualitative Study," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 647-665, June.
    18. David Melero-Cañas & Vicente Morales-Baños & Daniel N. Ardoy & David Manzano-Sánchez & Alfonso Valero-Valenzuela, 2021. "Enhancements in Cognitive Performance and Academic Achievement in Adolescents through the Hybridization of an Instructional Model with Gamification in Physical Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    19. Finnborg S. Steinþórsdóttir & Thomas Brorsen Smidt & Gyða M. Pétursdóttir & Þorgerður Einarsdóttir & Nicky Le Feuvre, 2019. "New managerialism in the academy: Gender bias and precarity," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 124-139, March.
    20. Alfonso D. Gajardo Sánchez & Luis R. Murillo-Zamorano & Joséà ngel López-Sánchez & Carmen Bueno-Muñoz, 2023. "Gamification in Health Care Management: Systematic Review of the Literature and Research Agenda," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16905-:d:1005341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.