IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16760-d1002723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Delivering Digital Healthcare for Elderly: A Holistic Framework for the Adoption of Ambient Assisted Living

Author

Listed:
  • Manal Almalki

    (College of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia)

  • Majid H. Alsulami

    (Applied College, Shaqra University, Shaqra 11961, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdulrahman A. Alshdadi

    (College of Computer and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 23218, Saudi Arabia)

  • Saleh N. Almuayqil

    (College of Computer and Information Sciences, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohammed S. Alsaqer

    (College of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia)

  • Anthony S. Atkins

    (School of Computing and Digital Technologies, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DE, UK)

  • Mohamed-Amine Choukou

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada)

Abstract

Adoption of Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) technologies for geriatric healthcare is suboptimal. This study aims to present the AAL Adoption Diamond Framework, encompassing a set of key enablers/barriers as factors, and describe our approach to developing this framework. A systematic literature review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. SCOPUS, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, ProQuest, Science Direct, ACM Digital Library, SpringerLink, Wiley Online Library and grey literature were searched. Thematic analysis was performed to identify factors reported or perceived to be important for adopting AAL technologies. Of 3717 studies initially retrieved, 109 were thoroughly screened and 52 met our inclusion criteria. Nineteen unique technology adoption factors were identified. The most common factor was privacy (50%) whereas data accuracy and affordability were the least common factors (4%). The highest number of factors found per a given study was eleven whereas the average number of factors across all studies included in our sample was four (mean = 3.9). We formed an AAL technology adoption framework based on the retrieved information and named it the AAL Adoption Diamond Framework. This holistic framework was formed by organising the identified technology adoption factors into four key dimensions: Human, Technology, Business, and Organisation. To conclude, the AAL Adoption Diamond Framework is holistic in term of recognizing key factors for the adoption of AAL technologies, and novel and unmatched in term of structuring them into four overarching themes or dimensions, bringing together the individual and the systemic factors evolving around the adoption of AAL technology. This framework is useful for stakeholders (e.g., decision-makers, healthcare providers, and caregivers) to adopt and implement AAL technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Manal Almalki & Majid H. Alsulami & Abdulrahman A. Alshdadi & Saleh N. Almuayqil & Mohammed S. Alsaqer & Anthony S. Atkins & Mohamed-Amine Choukou, 2022. "Delivering Digital Healthcare for Elderly: A Holistic Framework for the Adoption of Ambient Assisted Living," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16760-:d:1002723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16760/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16760/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marikyan, Davit & Papagiannidis, Savvas & Alamanos, Eleftherios, 2019. "A systematic review of the smart home literature: A user perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 139-154.
    2. Wilson, Charlie & Hargreaves, Tom & Hauxwell-Baldwin, Richard, 2017. "Benefits and risks of smart home technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 72-83.
    3. Alessandro Liberati & Douglas G Altman & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Cynthia Mulrow & Peter C Gøtzsche & John P A Ioannidis & Mike Clarke & P J Devereaux & Jos Kleijnen & David Moher, 2009. "The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-28, July.
    4. Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Davidson, Rosemary & Bicket, Martha & Whitmarsh, Lorraine, 2013. "Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 363-374.
    5. Quynh Lê & Hoang Boi Nguyen & Tony Barnett, 2012. "Smart Homes for Older People: Positive Aging in a Digital World," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-11, June.
    6. Shirley Taylor & Peter A. Todd, 1995. "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 144-176, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tu, Gengyang & Faure, Corinne & Schleich, Joachim & Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte, 2021. "The heat is off! The role of technology attributes and individual attitudes in the diffusion of Smart thermostats – findings from a multi-country survey," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Attour, Amel & Baudino, Marco & Krafft, Jackie & Lazaric, Nathalie, 2020. "Determinants of energy tracking application use at the city level: Evidence from France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    3. Su-Yen Chen & Chiachun Lee, 2019. "Perceptions of the Impact of High-Level-Machine-Intelligence from University Students in Taiwan: The Case for Human Professions, Autonomous Vehicles, and Smart Homes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Große-Kreul, Felix, 2022. "What will drive household adoption of smart energy? Insights from a consumer acceptance study in Germany," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    6. Pal, Debajyoti & Zhang, Xiangmin & Siyal, Saeed, 2021. "Prohibitive factors to the acceptance of Internet of Things (IoT) technology in society: A smart-home context using a resistive modelling approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    7. Daniel J. Mallinson & Saahir Shafi, 2022. "Smart home technology: Challenges and opportunities for collaborative governance and policy research," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(3), pages 330-352, May.
    8. Wei Gu & Peng Bao & Wenyuan Hao & Jaewoong Kim, 2019. "Empirical Examination of Intention to Continue to Use Smart Home Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-12, September.
    9. Amel Attour & Marco Baudino & Jackie Krafft & Nathalie Lazaric, 2020. "Determinants of smart energy tracking application use at the city level: Evidence from France," Post-Print hal-02942483, HAL.
    10. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D., 2020. "Smart home technologies in Europe: A critical review of concepts, benefits, risks and policies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    11. Ferreira, Laura & Oliveira, Tiago & Neves, Catarina, 2023. "Consumer's intention to use and recommend smart home technologies: The role of environmental awareness," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    12. Olugbenga Timo Oladinrin & Jayantha Wadu Mesthrige & Lekan Damilola Ojo & João Alencastro & Muhammad Rana, 2023. "Smart Home Technologies to Facilitate Ageing-in-Place: Professionals Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Gabriella Facchinetti & Giorgia Petrucci & Beatrice Albanesi & Maria Grazia De Marinis & Michela Piredda, 2023. "Can Smart Home Technologies Help Older Adults Manage Their Chronic Condition? A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Flavio Martins & Maria Fatima Almeida & Rodrigo Calili & Agatha Oliveira, 2020. "Design Thinking Applied to Smart Home Projects: A User-Centric and Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, December.
    15. Chamaret, Cécile & Steyer, Véronique & Mayer, Julie C., 2020. "“Hands off my meter!” when municipalities resist smart meters: Linking arguments and degrees of resistance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    16. Younjoo Cho & Anseop Choi, 2020. "Application of Affordance Factors for User-Centered Smart Homes: A Case Study Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    17. Birgul Basarir-Ozel & Hande Bahar Turker & Vesile Aslihan Nasir, 2022. "Identifying the Key Drivers and Barriers of Smart Home Adoption: A Thematic Analysis from the Business Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    18. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Martiskainen, Mari & Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D., 2021. "Knowledge, energy sustainability, and vulnerability in the demographics of smart home technology diffusion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    19. Calver, Philippa & Simcock, Neil, 2021. "Demand response and energy justice: A critical overview of ethical risks and opportunities within digital, decentralised, and decarbonised futures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    20. Baudier, Patricia & Ammi, Chantal & Deboeuf-Rouchon, Matthieu, 2020. "Smart home: Highly-educated students' acceptance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16760-:d:1002723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.