IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p13970-d954758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global Ban on Plastic and What Next? Are Consumers Ready to Replace Plastic with the Second-Generation Bioplastic? Results of the Snowball Sample Consumer Research in China, Western and Eastern Europe, North America and Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Ewa Kochanska

    (Research and Innovation Center Pro-Akademia, 9/11 Innowacyjna Str., 95-050 Konstantynow Lodzki, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Wozniak

    (Research and Innovation Center Pro-Akademia, 9/11 Innowacyjna Str., 95-050 Konstantynow Lodzki, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Nowaczyk

    (Research and Innovation Center Pro-Akademia, 9/11 Innowacyjna Str., 95-050 Konstantynow Lodzki, Poland)

  • Patrícia J. Piedade

    (Unidade de Bioenergia e Biorrefinerias, Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia I.P., Estrada do Paço do Lumiar 22, 1649-038 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Marilena Lino de Almeida Lavorato

    (BISA Benchmarking Inteligência Sustentável, Av. Nove de Julho—Bela Vista, São Paulo CEP 01313-001, Brazil)

  • Alexandre Marcelo Almeida

    (Commitment Prestação Serviços, São Paulo CEP 05844-120, Brazil)

  • Ana Rita C. Morais

    (School of Engineering, The University of Kansas, 4165E Learned Hall, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA)

  • Rafal M. Lukasik

    (Unidade de Bioenergia e Biorrefinerias, Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia I.P., Estrada do Paço do Lumiar 22, 1649-038 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

Plastic can be used for many things and at the same time is the most versatile material in our modern world. However, the uncontrolled and unprecedented use of plastic comes to its end. The global ban on plastic brings significant changes in technology but even more so in civil perception—changes taking place before our eyes. The aim of this study was to find answers to the questions about the readiness of consumers for a global ban on plastic. Within the research, the differences in consumer acceptance in countries in Europe, South and North America and Asia and the expression of social readiness to change attitudes towards plastic food packaging were analyzed. This work sketches the legal framework related to limiting the use of one-use food packaging made of fossil raw materials at the level of the European Union, Poland and Portugal but also at the level of the two largest economies in the world, China and the United States, as well as lower-income countries, e.g., Ukraine and Brazil. The survey results were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The performed study demonstrates that, in in all the surveyed countries, appropriate legal acts related to the reduction of plastic in everyday life are already in place. Furthermore, this work demonstrates the full understanding of plastic banning in all surveyed countries. Consumers are aware that every effort should be made to prevent the world from drowning in plastic waste. Society is, in general, open to the use of bioplastics produced from the second-generation resource if second-generation bioplastics contribute to environmental and pollution reduction targets.

Suggested Citation

  • Ewa Kochanska & Katarzyna Wozniak & Agnieszka Nowaczyk & Patrícia J. Piedade & Marilena Lino de Almeida Lavorato & Alexandre Marcelo Almeida & Ana Rita C. Morais & Rafal M. Lukasik, 2022. "Global Ban on Plastic and What Next? Are Consumers Ready to Replace Plastic with the Second-Generation Bioplastic? Results of the Snowball Sample Consumer Research in China, Western and Eastern Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-25, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13970-:d:954758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13970/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13970/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bui, My (Myla) & Tangari, Andrea Heintz & Haws, Kelly L., 2017. "Can health “halos” extend to food packaging? An investigation into food healthfulness perceptions and serving sizes on consumption decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 221-228.
    2. World Bank, 2020. "Purchasing Power Parities and the Size of World Economies," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 33623, December.
    3. Ewa Kochańska & Rafał M. Łukasik & Maciej Dzikuć, 2021. "New Circular Challenges in the Development of Take-Away Food Packaging in the COVID-19 Period," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Juelin Yin & Yuli Zhang, 2012. "Institutional Dynamics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in an Emerging Country Context: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 301-316, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deniz Turkcu & Nina Tura & Ville Ojanen, 2022. "A Conceptual Framework of the Sustainability Challenges Experienced during the Life Cycle of Biobased Packaging Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Kalpana Tokas & Kartik Yadav, 2023. "Foreign Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Case of an Emerging Market," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(6), pages 1302-1325, December.
    3. WANG Jifu & GUPTA Vipin & LYBOLT Liza & WANG Xiuli, 2022. "Corrected Game Model In Csr: Mnc Strategies And Chinese Practice," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 17(3), pages 269-287, December.
    4. Na Shen & Kevin Au & Weiwen Li, 2020. "Strategic alignment of intangible assets: The role of corporate social responsibility," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 1119-1139, December.
    5. Tong, Xun & Chen, Jianghang & Zhu, Qinghua & Cheng, T.C.E., 2018. "Technical assistance, inspection regime, and corporate social responsibility performance: A behavioural perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 59-69.
    6. Baobao Song & Xiaomeng Lan, 2022. "Meeting Consumers’ Expectations: Exploring Corporate Social Advocacy Communication in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Shu-Yun Du & Xiao-Chen Shao & Alfredo Jiménez & Jeoung Yul Lee, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility of Chinese Multinational Enterprises: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Germano Glufke Reis & Carla Forte Maiolino Molento, 2020. "Emerging Market Multinationals and International Corporate Social Responsibility Standards: Bringing Animals to the Fore," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 351-368, October.
    9. Khurshid Djalilov & Christopher A. Hartwell, 2023. "The spirit is willing, but the institutions are weak: disclosure of corporate social responsibility and the financial sector in transition," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(2), pages 385-427, June.
    10. Jacques, Pierre & Delannoy, Louis & Andrieu, Baptiste & Yilmaz, Devrim & Jeanmart, Hervé & Godin, Antoine, 2023. "Assessing the economic consequences of an energy transition through a biophysical stock-flow consistent model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    11. Min Zhang & Biying Jin & G. Alan Wang & Thong Ngee Goh & Zhen He, 2016. "A Study of Key Success Factors of Service Enterprises in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Branko Milanovic, 2022. "After the Financial Crisis: The Evolution of the Global Income Distribution Between 2008 and 2013," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 68(1), pages 43-73, March.
    13. Qianqian Hu & Tianlun Zhu & Chien-Liang Lin & Tiejun Chen & Tachia Chin, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance in China’s Manufacturing: A Global Perspective of Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Xiaohui Hou & Bo Wang & Yu Gao, 2020. "Stakeholder Protection, Public Trust, and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Listed SMEs in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-25, July.
    15. Khan, Majid & Lockhart, James & Bathurst, Ralph, 2021. "The institutional analysis of CSR: Learnings from an emerging country," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    16. Yanica P. Dimitrova, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Innovation – the Meaningful Connection," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 89-108.
    17. Yu, Yin & Chi, Jing, 2021. "Political embeddedness, media positioning and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    18. Ebrahim Soltani & Jawad Syed & Ying-Ying Liao & Abdullah Iqbal, 2015. "Managerial Mindsets Toward Corporate Social Responsibility: The Case of Auto Industry in Iran," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 129(4), pages 795-810, July.
    19. Figueira, Sandra & Gauthier, Caroline & Torres de Oliveira, Rui, 2023. "CSR and stakeholder salience in MNE subsidiaries in emerging markets," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5).
    20. ChungMing Lau & Yuan Lu & Qiang Liang, 2016. "Corporate Social Responsibility in China: A Corporate Governance Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 73-87, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13970-:d:954758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.