IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13135-d940385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences According to Sex in the Relationship between Social Participation and Well-Being: A Network Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Di Zhao

    (Department of Health Psychology, School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China)

  • Guopeng Li

    (Department of Health Psychology, School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China)

  • Miao Zhou

    (Department of Health Psychology, School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China)

  • Qing Wang

    (Department of Health Psychology, School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China)

  • Yiming Gao

    (Department of Health Psychology, School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China)

  • Xiangyu Zhao

    (Department of Health Psychology, School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China)

  • Xinting Zhang

    (Department of Pediatrics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China)

  • Ping Li

    (Department of Health Psychology, School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China)

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the effects of different types of social participation on the components of well-being, as well as the differences according to sex in the relationship between social participation and well-being. This was a cross-sectional community study. Well-being was measured using the positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment (PERMA) profile. Social participation included activities of daily life, sports and entertainment activities, and social service activities. The independent association between each type of social participation and the components of well-being was examined by using a network analysis in both males and females. Of all 1276 participants surveyed, 60% were females. The results of the network analysis showed that positive emotion–housework (0.263), positive emotion–games (0.102), engagement–housework (0.107), engagement–work (0.054), and meaning–socializing (0.085) had unique connections in males; the average predictability in the network was 0.417. For females, positive emotion–physical activity (0.102), engagement–associations or societies (0.071), relationships–physical (0.090), relationships–socializing (0.092), and relationships–volunteering activities (0.133) had significant connections; the average predictability in the network was 0.358. Different types of social participation may have different effects on the components of well-being. Furthermore, differences according to sex in the relationship between social participation and well-being should be considered when formulating interventions to improve well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Di Zhao & Guopeng Li & Miao Zhou & Qing Wang & Yiming Gao & Xiangyu Zhao & Xinting Zhang & Ping Li, 2022. "Differences According to Sex in the Relationship between Social Participation and Well-Being: A Network Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-11, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13135-:d:940385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13135/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13135/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minxia Luo & Birthe Macdonald & Gizem Hülür, 2022. "Not “The More The Merrier”: Diminishing Returns to Daily Face-To-Face Social Interaction Frequency for Well-Being in Older Age," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(8), pages 1431-1441.
    2. S. Brent Jackson & Kathryn T. Stevenson & Lincoln R. Larson & M. Nils Peterson & Erin Seekamp, 2021. "Outdoor Activity Participation Improves Adolescents’ Mental Health and Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Hannah M. Schade & Jan Digutsch & Thomas Kleinsorge & Yan Fan, 2021. "Having to Work from Home: Basic Needs, Well-Being, and Motivation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Sacha Epskamp & Mijke Rhemtulla & Denny Borsboom, 2017. "Generalized Network Psychometrics: Combining Network and Latent Variable Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(4), pages 904-927, December.
    5. Felicia Huppert & Timothy So, 2013. "Flourishing Across Europe: Application of a New Conceptual Framework for Defining Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 837-861, February.
    6. Ethan McMahan & David Estes, 2011. "Hedonic Versus Eudaimonic Conceptions of Well-being: Evidence of Differential Associations With Self-reported Well-being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 103(1), pages 93-108, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ricardo Crespo & Belén Mesurado, 2015. "Happiness Economics, Eudaimonia and Positive Psychology: From Happiness Economics to Flourishing Economics," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 931-946, August.
    2. Horváth Zsuzsánna E. & Nováky Erzsébet, 2016. "Development of a Future Orientation Model in Emerging Adulthood in Hungary," Social Change Review, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 69-95, December.
    3. Savatore Puglisi & Ionuț Virgil Șerban, 2019. "Beyond Gdp: Which Options To Better Represent Modern Socio-Economic Progress?," Sociology and Social Work Review, International Society for projects in Education and Research, vol. 3(1), pages 17-32, June.
    4. Mizuki Wada & Yoshitake Takebayashi & Michio Murakami, 2022. "Role of Values and Resilience in Well-Being among Individuals Affected by the Fukushima Disaster," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(6), pages 3503-3515, December.
    5. Kay Fretwell & Alison Greig, 2019. "Towards a Better Understanding of the Relationship between Individual’s Self-Reported Connection to Nature, Personal Well-Being and Environmental Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Sakari Kainulainen, 2020. "Flourishing within the Working-Aged Finnish Population," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(1), pages 187-205, March.
    7. Wang, Richard & Ye, Zhongnan & Lu, Miaojia & Hsu, Shu-Chien, 2022. "Understanding post-pandemic work-from-home behaviours and community level energy reduction via agent-based modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    8. Isabella Romano & Mark A. Ferro & Karen A. Patte & Ed Diener & Scott T. Leatherdale, 2020. "Measurement Invariance of the Flourishing Scale among a Large Sample of Canadian Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Susana Rodríguez & Bibiana Regueiro & Isabel Piñeiro & Antonio Valle & Benigno Sánchez & Tania Vieites & Carolina Rodríguez-Llorente, 2020. "Success in Mathematics and Academic Wellbeing in Primary-School Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-11, May.
    10. R. A. Burns, 2020. "Age-Related Differences in the Factor Structure of Multiple Wellbeing Indicators in a Large Multinational European Survey," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 37-52, January.
    11. Lanxi Huang & Margaret L. Kern & Lindsay G. Oades, 2020. "Strengthening University Student Wellbeing: Language and Perceptions of Chinese International Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Papageorgiou, Athanasios, 2018. "The Effect of Immigration on the Well-Being of Native Populations: Evidence from the United Kingdom," MPRA Paper 93045, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Kosorić, Vesna & Huang, Huajing & Tablada, Abel & Lau, Siu-Kit & Tan, Hugh T.W., 2019. "Survey on the social acceptance of the productive façade concept integrating photovoltaic and farming systems in high-rise public housing blocks in Singapore," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 197-214.
    14. Elena Hohensee & Kira Elena Weber, 2022. "Teacher Trainees’ Well-Being—The Role of Personal Resources," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Nona C. Kiknadze & Blaine J. Fowers, 2023. "Cultural Variation in Flourishing," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 2223-2244, October.
    16. Liu, Yinbo & Ni, Xiaoli & Niu, Gengfeng, 2020. "The influence of active social networking services use and social capital on flourishing in Chinese adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    17. Wenjie Li & Linting Zhang & Chengcheng Li & Ningzhe Zhu & Jingjing Zhao & Feng Kong, 2022. "Pursuing Pleasure or Meaning: A Cross-Lagged Analysis of Happiness Motives and Well-being in Adolescents," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 3981-3999, December.
    18. Alison Pritchard & Miles Richardson & David Sheffield & Kirsten McEwan, 2020. "The Relationship Between Nature Connectedness and Eudaimonic Well-Being: A Meta-analysis," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1145-1167, March.
    19. Ramirez-Garcia, Carolina & de Perea, Juan García-Álvarez & Garcia-Del Junco, Julio, 2019. "La felicidad en el trabajo: Validación de una escala de medida," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 59(5), October.
    20. Ellen Beate Hansen Sandseter & Monica Seland, 2016. "Children’s Experience of Activities and Participation and their Subjective Well-Being in Norwegian Early Childhood Education and Care Institutions," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 9(4), pages 913-932, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13135-:d:940385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.