IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i9p4580-d543951.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Drone Logistic Model for Transporting the Complete Analytic Volume of a Large-Scale University Laboratory

Author

Listed:
  • Karl-Arne Johannessen

    (The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
    Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway)

  • Hans Comtet

    (The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
    The Department of Design, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Erik Fosse

    (The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
    Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway)

Abstract

We present a model for drone transport of the complete annual analytic volume of 6.5 million analyses—(routine and emergency) between two inner-city university laboratories at Oslo University Hospital located 1.8 km apart and with a time restriction for the analyses of no more than 60 min. The total laboratory activity was analyzed per min for the complete year of 2018. The time from the clinical ordering of tests to the loading of the drone, drone transport time, and analysis time after the sample arrived at the analyzing laboratory were assessed using the lead time of emergency analyses of C-reactive protein, troponin, and the international normalized ratio. The activity had characteristic diurnal patterns, with the most intensive traffic between 8 and 12 a.m. on weekdays and there being considerably less traffic for the rest of the day, at night and on weekends. Drone schedules with departures 15–60 min apart were simulated. A maximum of 15 min between flights was required to meet the emergency demand for the analyses being completed within 60 min. The required drone weight capacity was below 3.5 kg at all times. In multiple simulations, the drone times were appropriate, whereas variations in the clinic- and laboratory-related time intervals caused violations of the allowed time 50% of the time. Drone transport with regular schedules may potentially improve the transport time compared with traditional ground transport and allow the merging of large laboratories, even when the demand for emergency analyses restricts the maximum transport time. Comprehensive economic evaluations and robust drone technology are needed before such solutions can be ready for implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Karl-Arne Johannessen & Hans Comtet & Erik Fosse, 2021. "A Drone Logistic Model for Transporting the Complete Analytic Volume of a Large-Scale University Laboratory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4580-:d:543951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4580/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4580/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shreeranga Bhat & E.V. Gijo & N.A. Jnanesh, 2014. "Application of Lean Six Sigma methodology in the registration process of a hospital," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 63(5), pages 613-643, June.
    2. Andrea Chiarini & Enrico Bracci, 2013. "Implementing Lean Six Sigma in healthcare: issues from Italy," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5), pages 361-368, September.
    3. David Pisinger & Stefan Ropke, 2019. "Large Neighborhood Search," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Michel Gendreau & Jean-Yves Potvin (ed.), Handbook of Metaheuristics, edition 3, chapter 0, pages 99-127, Springer.
    4. Taş, Duygu & Gendreau, Michel & Jabali, Ola & Laporte, Gilbert, 2016. "The traveling salesman problem with time-dependent service times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 372-383.
    5. Zoe Radnor & Paul Walley, 2008. "Learning to Walk Before We Try to Run: Adapting Lean for the Public Sector," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 13-20, February.
    6. Jiyoon Park & Solhee Kim & Kyo Suh, 2018. "A Comparative Analysis of the Environmental Benefits of Drone-Based Delivery Services in Urban and Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Chiang, Wen-Chyuan & Li, Yuyu & Shang, Jennifer & Urban, Timothy L., 2019. "Impact of drone delivery on sustainability and cost: Realizing the UAV potential through vehicle routing optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1164-1175.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nils Boysen & Stefan Fedtke & Stefan Schwerdfeger, 2021. "Last-mile delivery concepts: a survey from an operational research perspective," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 1-58, March.
    2. Joonyup Eun & Byung Duk Song & Sangbok Lee & Dae-Eun Lim, 2019. "Mathematical Investigation on the Sustainability of UAV Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-15, October.
    3. D’Andreamatteo, Antonio & Ianni, Luca & Lega, Federico & Sargiacomo, Massimo, 2015. "Lean in healthcare: A comprehensive review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(9), pages 1197-1209.
    4. Chen, Cheng & Demir, Emrah & Huang, Yuan, 2021. "An adaptive large neighborhood search heuristic for the vehicle routing problem with time windows and delivery robots," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 1164-1180.
    5. Zhao Zhang & Chun-Yan Xiao & Zhi-Guo Zhang, 2023. "Analysis and Empirical Study of Factors Influencing Urban Residents’ Acceptance of Routine Drone Deliveries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-27, September.
    6. Sergio Maria Patella & Gianluca Grazieschi & Valerio Gatta & Edoardo Marcucci & Stefano Carrese, 2020. "The Adoption of Green Vehicles in Last Mile Logistics: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, December.
    7. El Mehdi, Er Raqabi & Ilyas, Himmich & Nizar, El Hachemi & Issmaïl, El Hallaoui & François, Soumis, 2023. "Incremental LNS framework for integrated production, inventory, and vessel scheduling: Application to a global supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    8. Rajko Novak & Aleksander Janes, 2017. "Merjenje zrelosti procesne usmerjenosti," UPP Monograph Series, University of Primorska Press, number 978-961-7023-55-8.
    9. Liu, Baoli & Li, Zhi-Chun & Sheng, Dian & Wang, Yadong, 2021. "Integrated planning of berth allocation and vessel sequencing in a seaport with one-way navigation channel," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 23-47.
    10. Jacek Buko & Marek Bulsa & Adam Makowski, 2022. "Spatial Premises and Key Conditions for the Use of UAVs for Delivery of Items on the Example of the Polish Courier and Postal Services Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Yichen Lu & Chao Yang & Jun Yang, 2022. "A multi-objective humanitarian pickup and delivery vehicle routing problem with drones," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 291-353, December.
    12. Anna Kwasiborska & Anna Stelmach & Izabela Jabłońska, 2023. "Quantitative and Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption in Urban Logistics Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Selected Means of Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-27, September.
    13. Zeynep Tosuner & Osman Karaer & Ümit İnce, 2023. "Lean Six Sigma Applications in a Multicenter Pathology Laboratory: an Industrial Pathology Model," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Baals, Julian & Emde, Simon & Turkensteen, Marcel, 2023. "Minimizing earliness-tardiness costs in supplier networks—A just-in-time truck routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 707-741.
    15. Kallestad, Jakob & Hasibi, Ramin & Hemmati, Ahmad & Sörensen, Kenneth, 2023. "A general deep reinforcement learning hyperheuristic framework for solving combinatorial optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 446-468.
    16. Matt Andrews & Lant Pritchett & Michael Woolcock, 2016. "Scaling PDIA through Broad Agency, and Your Role," CID Working Papers 315, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    17. Federica Centauri & Marta Marsilio & Stefano Villa & Francesco Nicosia, 2016. "Implementare il modello Lean nelle organizzazioni sanitarie: il caso dell?Ospedale Galliera," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(100), pages 27-55.
    18. Dumez, Dorian & Lehuédé, Fabien & Péton, Olivier, 2021. "A large neighborhood search approach to the vehicle routing problem with delivery options," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 103-132.
    19. Effrosyni Taraza & Sofia Anastasiadou & Andreas Masouras & Christos Papademetriou, 2023. "Sustainable Development and Implementation of Quality Management Excellence Models in Public Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    20. Amine Masmoudi, M. & Mancini, Simona & Baldacci, Roberto & Kuo, Yong-Hong, 2022. "Vehicle routing problems with drones equipped with multi-package payload compartments," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4580-:d:543951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.