IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i23p12624-d691615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural Variance in Reception and Interpretation of Social Media COVID-19 Disinformation in French-Speaking Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Hughes

    (Polarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab (PERIL), American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA
    Program of Justice, Law, and Criminology, School of Public Affairs, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA)

  • Kesa White

    (Polarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab (PERIL), American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA)

  • Jennifer West

    (Polarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab (PERIL), American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA
    Program of Justice, Law, and Criminology, School of Public Affairs, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA)

  • Meili Criezis

    (Polarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab (PERIL), American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA
    Program of Justice, Law, and Criminology, School of Public Affairs, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA)

  • Cindy Zhou

    (Polarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab (PERIL), American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA)

  • Sarah Bartholomew

    (Polarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab (PERIL), American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA
    Program of Justice, Law, and Criminology, School of Public Affairs, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA)

Abstract

Digital communication technology has created a world in which media are capable of crossing national boundaries as never before. As a result, language is increasingly the salient category determining individuals’ media consumption. Today, a single social media post can travel around the world, reaching anyone who speaks its language. This poses significant challenges to combatting the spread of disinformation, as an ever-growing pool of disinformation purveyors reach audiences larger than ever before. This dynamic is complicated, however, by the diversity of audience interpretations of message content within a particular language group. Both across and within national boundaries, a single message may be subject to a variety of interpretations depending on the cultural experiences and identities of its recipients. This study explores that dynamic through analysis of French language anti-vaccine and COVID-denialist disinformation. Using qualitative coding methodology, a team of researchers empirically identify common and far-reaching patterns of Francophone COVID disinformation narratives and rhetoric. These narratives and rhetorics are then subjected to hermeneutic close reading to determine likely variations in their reception across different French-speaking cultures. Data were gathered and analyzed between the dates of 24 March 2021 and 27 April 2021. Results of this study indicate the need for awareness on the part of public health officials combatting COVID disinformation online, for both the transnational reach of disinformation targeting speakers of a single language and for variations in meaning and salience across cultures within that language group.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Hughes & Kesa White & Jennifer West & Meili Criezis & Cindy Zhou & Sarah Bartholomew, 2021. "Cultural Variance in Reception and Interpretation of Social Media COVID-19 Disinformation in French-Speaking Regions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-28, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12624-:d:691615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12624/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12624/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian Hughes & Cynthia Miller-Idriss & Rachael Piltch-Loeb & Beth Goldberg & Kesa White & Meili Criezis & Elena Savoia, 2021. "Development of a Codebook of Online Anti-Vaccination Rhetoric to Manage COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Murphy, S.T. & Frank, L.B. & Chatterjee, J.S. & Moran, M.B. & Zhao, N. & De Herrera, P.A. & Baezconde-Garbanati, L.A., 2015. "Comparing the relative efficacy of narrative vs nonnarrative health messages in reducing health disparities using a randomized trial," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(10), pages 2117-2123.
    3. Christopher J. Bryan & David S. Yeager & Cintia P. Hinojosa, 2019. "A values-alignment intervention protects adolescents from the effects of food marketing," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(6), pages 596-603, June.
    4. Carlos Rodríguez-Pérez & Francisco J. Paniagua-Rojano & Raúl Magallón-Rosa, 2021. "Debunking Political Disinformation through Journalists’ Perceptions: An Analysis of Colombia’s Fact-Checking News Practices," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 264-275.
    5. Adebanke L. Adebayo & Rochelle Davidson Mhonde & Nathaniel DeNicola & Edward Maibach, 2020. "The Effectiveness of Narrative Versus Didactic Information Formats on Pregnant Women’s Knowledge, Risk Perception, Self-Efficacy, and Information Seeking Related to Climate Change Health Risks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Gilkey, Melissa B. & Grabert, Brigid K. & Malo, Teri L. & Hall, Megan E. & Brewer, Noel T., 2020. "Physicians’ rhetorical strategies for motivating HPV vaccination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    7. Andrew M. Guess & Brendan Nyhan & Jason Reifler, 2020. "Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(5), pages 472-480, May.
    8. Archita Pathak & Rohini K. Srihari & Nihit Natu, 2021. "Disinformation: analysis and identification," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 357-375, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Kłak & Jolanta Grygielska & Małgorzata Mańczak & Ewelina Ejchman-Pac & Jakub Owoc & Urszula Religioni & Robert Olszewski, 2022. "Online Information of COVID-19: Visibility and Characterization of Highest Positioned Websites by Google between March and April 2020—A Cross-Country Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-26, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brian Hughes & Cynthia Miller-Idriss & Rachael Piltch-Loeb & Beth Goldberg & Kesa White & Meili Criezis & Elena Savoia, 2021. "Development of a Codebook of Online Anti-Vaccination Rhetoric to Manage COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Sergei Guriev & Elias Papaioannou, 2022. "The Political Economy of Populism," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 60(3), pages 753-832, September.
    3. Nyabuti Damaris Kemunto & Prof. Hezron Mogambi & Dr. Anita Kiamba, 2023. "Foreign Policy Disinformation: Fueling Polarization and Deterioration of the Public Sphere in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(8), pages 425-442, August.
    4. Philipp Lorenz-Spreen & Stephan Lewandowsky & Cass R. Sunstein & Ralph Hertwig, 2020. "How behavioural sciences can promote truth, autonomy and democratic discourse online," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(11), pages 1102-1109, November.
    5. Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza & Kristi D. Graves & Sara Gómez-Trillos & Pilar Carrera & Claudia Campos & Lyndsay Anderson & George Luta & Beth N. Peshkin & Marc D. Schwartz & Ana-Paula Cupertino & Nath, 2019. "Culturally Targeted Video Improves Psychosocial Outcomes in Latina Women at Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Dixon, Helen & Scully, Maree & Wakefield, Melanie & Kelly, Bridget & Pettigrew, Simone & Chapman, Kathy & Niederdeppe, Jeff, 2020. "Can counter-advertising protect spectators of elite sport against the influence of unhealthy food and beverage sponsorship? A naturalistic trial," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    7. Saumya Bhadani & Shun Yamaya & Alessandro Flammini & Filippo Menczer & Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia & Brendan Nyhan, 2022. "Political audience diversity and news reliability in algorithmic ranking," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(4), pages 495-505, April.
    8. Nuzhath, Tasmiah & Spiegelman, Abigail & Scobee, Julia & Goidel, Kirby & Washburn, David & Callaghan, Timothy, 2023. "Primary care physicians’ strategies for addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    9. Gregory Eady & Tom Paskhalis & Jan Zilinsky & Richard Bonneau & Jonathan Nagler & Joshua A. Tucker, 2023. "Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Daniel Muise & Nilam Ram & Thomas Robinson & Byron Reeves, 2023. "Identification, Impacts, and Opportunities of Three Common Measurement Considerations when using Digital Trace Data," Papers 2310.00197, arXiv.org.
    11. Guilhem Lecouteux, 2020. "Welfare Economics in Large Worlds: Welfare and Public Policies in an Uncertain Environment," GREDEG Working Papers 2020-08, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    12. repec:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:2:p:484-504 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Laura Prieto-Pinto & María Fernanda Lara-Díaz & Nathaly Garzón-Orjuela & Dayanne Herrera & Carol Páez-Canro & Jorge Humberto Reyes & Lina González-Gordon & Viviana Jiménez-Murcia & Javier Eslava-Schma, 2019. "Effectiveness assessment of maternal and neonatal health video clips in knowledge transfer using neuromarketing tools: A randomized crossover trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Marilena Paraskeva, 2022. "The Covid-19 Anti-vaccination Movement in Cyprus: an investigation of its discourses (AMID)," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 179, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.
    15. Robert M. Ross & David G. Rand & Gordon Pennycook, 2021. "Beyond “fake news†: Analytic thinking and the detection of false and hyperpartisan news headlines," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 16(2), pages 484-504, March.
    16. Edwina Mingay & Melissa Hart & Serene Yoong & Alexis Hure, 2021. "Why We Eat the Way We Do: A Call to Consider Food Culture in Public Health Initiatives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-10, November.
    17. Alexander J. Stewart & Antonio A. Arechar & David G. Rand & Joshua B. Plotkin, 2021. "The Game Theory of Fake News," Papers 2108.13687, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    18. Brown, Tim & Dyck, Isabel & Greenhough, Beth & Raven-Ellison, Menah & Dembinsky, Melanie & Ornstein, Mark & Duffy, Stephen W., 2017. "Fear, family and the placing of emotion: Black women's responses to a breast cancer awareness intervention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 90-96.
    19. Bosch, Oriol J. & Sturgis, Patrick & Kuha, Jouni & Revilla, Melanie, 2023. "Uncovering digital trace data biases: tracking undercoverage in web tracking data," SocArXiv t2dbj, Center for Open Science.
    20. Meng Zhen Larsen & Michael R. Haupt & Tiana McMann & Raphael E. Cuomo & Tim K. Mackey, 2023. "The Influence of News Consumption Habits and Dispositional Traits on Trust in Medical Scientists," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-13, May.
    21. Robertson, Deirdre & Andersson, Ylva & Lavin, Ciarán & Lunn, Pete, 2023. "Comparing expert and public perceptions of the obesity epidemic in 3 countries," Papers WP768, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12624-:d:691615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.