IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10454-d650005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Setting-Sensitive Conceptualization and Assessment of Quality of Life in Telemedical Care—Study Protocol of the Tele-QoL Project

Author

Listed:
  • Klara Greffin

    (Department of Psychology, University of Greifswald, 17489 Greifswald, Germany)

  • Holger Muehlan

    (Department of Psychology, University of Greifswald, 17489 Greifswald, Germany)

  • Neeltje van den Berg

    (Department of Health Care Epidemiology and Community Health, Institute of Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, 17489 Greifswald, Germany)

  • Wolfgang Hoffmann

    (Department of Health Care Epidemiology and Community Health, Institute of Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, 17489 Greifswald, Germany)

  • Oliver Ritter

    (Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany
    Department of Cardiology, Brandenburg City Hospital, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany)

  • Michael Oeff

    (Department of Cardiology, Brandenburg City Hospital, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany)

  • Georg Schomerus

    (Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medicine Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Silke Schmidt

    (Department of Psychology, University of Greifswald, 17489 Greifswald, Germany)

Abstract

Quality of life (QoL) is a core patient-reported outcome in healthcare research, alongside primary clinical outcomes. A conceptual, operational, and psychometric elaboration of QoL in the context of TM is needed, because standardized instruments to assess QoL do not sufficiently represent essential aspects of intended outcomes of telemedical applications (TM). The overall aim is to develop an instrument that can adequately capture QoL in TM. For that purpose, an extended working model of QoL will be derived. Subsequently, an instrument will be developed and validated that captures those aspects of QoL that are influenced by TM. The initial exploratory study section includes (a) a systematic literature review, (b) a qualitative survey for concept elicitation, and (c) pre-testings using cognitive debriefings with patients and an expert workshop. The second quantitative section consists of an online expert survey and two patient surveys for piloting and validation of the newly developed instrument. The resulting questionnaire will assess central experiences of patients regarding telemedical applications and its impact on QoL more sensitively. Its use as adjunct instrument will lead to a more appropriate evaluation of TM and contribute to the improvement of care tailored to patients’ individual needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Klara Greffin & Holger Muehlan & Neeltje van den Berg & Wolfgang Hoffmann & Oliver Ritter & Michael Oeff & Georg Schomerus & Silke Schmidt, 2021. "Setting-Sensitive Conceptualization and Assessment of Quality of Life in Telemedical Care—Study Protocol of the Tele-QoL Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10454-:d:650005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10454/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10454/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Attkisson, C. Clifford & Zwick, Rebecca, 1982. "The client satisfaction questionnaire : Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 233-237, January.
    2. Katja Brenk-Franz & Judith H Hibbard & Wolfram J Herrmann & Tobias Freund & Joachim Szecsenyi & Sima Djalali & Claudia Steurer-Stey & Andreas Sönnichsen & Fabian Tiesler & Monika Storch & Nico Schneid, 2013. "Validation of the German Version of the Patient Activation Measure 13 (PAM13-D) in an International Multicentre Study of Primary Care Patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-6, September.
    3. Nancy J. Devlin & Richard Brooks, 2017. "EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present and Future," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 127-137, April.
    4. Benjamin Saunders & Julius Sim & Tom Kingstone & Shula Baker & Jackie Waterfield & Bernadette Bartlam & Heather Burroughs & Clare Jinks, 2018. "Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1893-1907, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer Tartaglia & Michelle McIntosh & Jonine Jancey & Jane Scott & Andrea Begley, 2021. "Exploring Feeding Practices and Food Literacy in Parents with Young Children from Disadvantaged Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Najwa Taghy & Linda Cambon & Caroline Boulliat & Olivier Aromatario & Claude Dussart, 2021. "Exploring the Determinants of Polypharmacy Prescribing and Dispensing Behaviours in Primary Care for the Elderly—Protocol for a Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-10, July.
    3. Baronet, Anne-Marie & Gerber, Gary J., 1997. "Client satisfaction in a community crisis center," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 443-453, November.
    4. Van Droogenbroeck, Ellen & Van Hove, Leo, 2020. "Intra-household task allocation in online grocery shopping: Together alone," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    5. repec:thr:techub:10019:y:2021:i:1:p:607-630 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Yea-Chan Lee & Da-Hye Son & Yu-Jin Kwon, 2020. "U-Shaped Association between Sleep Duration, C-Reactive Protein, and Uric Acid in Korean Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-11, April.
    7. Hans Arvidsson & Elisabeth Olin & Jennifer Strand & Inga Tidefors, 2014. "Effects of the Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM): A one-year cluster randomized study in a group of severely mentally ill persons," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(1), pages 95-102, February.
    8. Şahika Simsek-Cetinkaya & Simge Evrenol Ocal, 2023. "“Psychological Injuries Are Not Visible†: Experiences and Perceptions of Midwives and Nurses about Domestic Violence during Pregnancy," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 32(8), pages 1115-1123, November.
    9. Najwa Taghy & Viviane Ramel & Ana Rivadeneyra & Florence Carrouel & Linda Cambon & Claude Dussart, 2023. "Exploring the Determinants of Polypharmacy Prescribing and Dispensing Behaviors in Primary Care for the Elderly—Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Xudan Lin & Hong Zhu & Duo Yin, 2022. "Enhancing Rural Resilience in a Tea Town of China: Exploring Tea Farmers’ Knowledge Production for Tea Planting, Tea Processing and Tea Tasting," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Silvia Scaramuzzi & Sara Gabellini & Giovanni Belletti & Andrea Marescotti, 2021. "Agrobiodiversity-Oriented Food Systems between Public Policies and Private Action: A Socio-Ecological Model for Sustainable Territorial Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-32, November.
    12. Tongyu Meng & Jamie Newth & Christine Woods, 2022. "Ethical Sensemaking in Impact Investing: Reasons and Motives in the Chinese Renewable Energy Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 1091-1117, September.
    13. Annette Peart & Virginia Lewis & Chris Barton & Grant Russell, 2020. "Healthcare professionals providing care coordination to people living with multimorbidity: An interpretative phenomenological analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2317-2328, July.
    14. Soo-Yong Shin & Eun-Ju Lim, 2021. "Clinical Work and Life of Mid-Career Male Nurses: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-10, June.
    15. Fatoumata Fofana & Pat Bazeley & Antoine Regnault, 2020. "Applying a mixed methods design to test saturation for qualitative data in health outcomes research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, June.
    16. Alasdair Jones & Susan Parham, 2023. "Living in an Age-Friendly Community: Evidence from a Masterplanned Development in Southwest Sydney," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Godley, Susan Harrington & Fiedler, Elisa Mustari & Funk, Rodney R., 1998. "Consumer satisfaction of parents and their children with child/adolescent mental health services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 31-45, February.
    18. Diego M. Coraiola & Robbin Derry, 2020. "Remembering to Forget: The Historic Irresponsibility of U.S. Big Tobacco," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 233-252, October.
    19. Angela Sweeney & Sarah Fahmy & Fiona Nolan & Nicola Morant & Zoe Fox & Brynmor Lloyd-Evans & David Osborn & Emma Burgess & Helen Gilburt & Rosemarie McCabe & Mike Slade & Sonia Johnson, 2014. "The Relationship between Therapeutic Alliance and Service User Satisfaction in Mental Health Inpatient Wards and Crisis House Alternatives: A Cross-Sectional Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-13, July.
    20. Stefan A. Lipman & Liying Zhang & Koonal K. Shah & Arthur E. Attema, 2023. "Time and lexicographic preferences in the valuation of EQ-5D-Y with time trade-off methodology," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(2), pages 293-305, March.
    21. Rajshri Roy & Alshaima Alsaie & Jessica Malloy & Joya A. Kemper, 2024. "Sustainable Culinary Skills: Fostering Vegetable-Centric Cooking Practices among Young Adults for Health and Environmental Benefits—A Qualitative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10454-:d:650005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.