IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i18p9436-d630441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Diary Study on Anticipated Leisure Time, Morning Recovery, and Employees’ Work Engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Seibel

    (Work and Organizational Psychology Group, Otto-Friedrich University of Bamberg, 96047 Bamberg, Germany
    Work and Organizational Psychology Group, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, 97070 Würzburg, Germany)

  • Judith Volmer

    (Work and Organizational Psychology Group, Otto-Friedrich University of Bamberg, 96047 Bamberg, Germany)

Abstract

Recovery during yesterday’s leisure time is beneficial for morning recovery, and morning recovery fosters employees’ work engagement, a positive, motivational state associated with job performance. We extended existing research by assuming that both, morning recovery (considered a resource) and anticipated leisure time (considered an anticipated resource gain), relate to work engagement. Anticipated leisure time comprises two constructs: general anticipation of leisure time, which refers to employees’ cognitive evaluation of their entire upcoming leisure time, and pleasant anticipation of a planned leisure activity, which describes a positive affective reaction because of one specific, upcoming leisure activity. We suggested that employees with high pleasant anticipation generate more thoughts of a planned leisure activity (ToPLA), which may distract them from their work, reducing their work engagement. A diary study over five days showed that morning recovery and general anticipation of leisure time were positively related to work engagement. Furthermore, employees with higher pleasant anticipation of a planned leisure activity reported more ToPLA. In contrast to our expectations, neither pleasant anticipation nor ToPLA was related to work engagement. In sum, this study introduced anticipated leisure time as a novel antecedent of work engagement and demonstrated that anticipated resource gains are important for high work engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Seibel & Judith Volmer, 2021. "A Diary Study on Anticipated Leisure Time, Morning Recovery, and Employees’ Work Engagement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9436-:d:630441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9436/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9436/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Quaquebeke, N. & Kerschreiter, R. & Buxton, A.E. & van Dick, R., 2010. "Two Lighthouses to Navigate: Effects of Ideal and Counter-Ideal Values on Follower Identification and Satisfaction with their Leaders," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2010-003-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    2. Sophie Leroy & Theresa M. Glomb, 2018. "Tasks Interrupted: How Anticipating Time Pressure on Resumption of an Interrupted Task Causes Attention Residue and Low Performance on Interrupting Tasks and How a “Ready-to-Resume” Plan Mitigates the," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 380-397, June.
    3. Niels Quaquebeke & Rudolf Kerschreiter & Alice Buxton & Rolf Dick, 2010. "Two Lighthouses to Navigate: Effects of Ideal and Counter-Ideal Values on Follower Identification and Satisfaction with Their Leaders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(2), pages 293-305, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthias Graf & Niels Van Quaquebeke & Rolf Van Dick, 2011. "Two Independent Value Orientations: Ideal and Counter-Ideal Leader Values and Their Impact on Followers’ Respect for and Identification with Their Leaders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(2), pages 185-195, December.
    2. Niels Van Quaquebeke & Jan U. Becker & Niko Goretzki & Christian Barrot, 2019. "Perceived Ethical Leadership Affects Customer Purchasing Intentions Beyond Ethical Marketing in Advertising Due to Moral Identity Self-Congruence Concerns," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 357-376, May.
    3. Andranik Tumasjan & Maria Strobel & Isabell Welpe, 2011. "Ethical Leadership Evaluations After Moral Transgression: Social Distance Makes the Difference," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 99(4), pages 609-622, April.
    4. Sebastian C. Schuh & Niels Quaquebeke & Natalija Keck & Anja S. Göritz & David Cremer & Katherine R. Xin, 2018. "Does it Take More Than Ideals? How Counter-Ideal Value Congruence Shapes Employees’ Trust in the Organization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(4), pages 987-1003, June.
    5. Catherine Marsh, 2013. "Business Executives’ Perceptions of Ethical Leadership and Its Development," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 565-582, May.
    6. Luqman, Adeel & Talwar, Shalini & Masood, Ayesha & Dhir, Amandeep, 2021. "Does enterprise social media use promote employee creativity and well-being?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 40-54.
    7. Barbara Barbieri & Marina Mondo & Silvia De Simone & Roberta Pinna & Maura Galletta & Jessica Pileri & Diego Bellini, 2024. "Enhancing Productivity at Home: The Role of Smart Work and Organizational Support in the Public Sector," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9436-:d:630441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.