IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i15p7835-d600262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the Impact of Tobacco Parity and Harm Reduction Tax Proposals Using the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace

Author

Listed:
  • Roberta Freitas-Lemos

    (Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA
    Co-first author, these authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Diana R. Keith

    (Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA
    Co-first author, these authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Allison N. Tegge

    (Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA
    Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA)

  • Jeffrey S. Stein

    (Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA)

  • K. Michael Cummings

    (Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA)

  • Warren K. Bickel

    (Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA)

Abstract

Taxes are a demonstrably effective method to suppress tobacco use. This study examined the effects of the tobacco parity (i.e., imposing taxes equally on all tobacco products) and the harm reduction (i.e., applying taxes in proportion to the products’ levels of harm) tax proposals on demand and substitution across products. A crowdsourced sample of cigarette smokers ( n = 35) completed purchasing trials with increasing tax magnitudes across different tax tiers in the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace in a repeated-measures design. Products were placed in three tax tiers (high, medium, and no tax) according to each proposal’s goal. The results indicated that total nicotine (mg) purchased was not significantly different between the proposals, with higher taxes yielding lower demand. However, as taxes increased, the tobacco parity proposal decreased the purchasing of all tobacco products and increased the purchasing of medicinal nicotine (i.e., the no tax tier). Conversely, the harm reduction proposal resulted in greater purchases of electronic nicotine delivery systems and smokeless tobacco (i.e., the medium tax tier). These findings support tobacco taxation as a robust tool for suppressing purchasing and suggest that differential taxation in proportion to product risk would be an effective way to incentivize smokers to switch from smoked to unsmoked products. Further studies should investigate the unintended consequences of their implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberta Freitas-Lemos & Diana R. Keith & Allison N. Tegge & Jeffrey S. Stein & K. Michael Cummings & Warren K. Bickel, 2021. "Estimating the Impact of Tobacco Parity and Harm Reduction Tax Proposals Using the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:7835-:d:600262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7835/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7835/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip DeCicca & Donald Kenkel & Feng Liu, 2013. "Who Pays Cigarette Taxes? The Impact of Consumer Price Search," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(2), pages 516-529, May.
    2. Andrea S. Licht & Andrew J. Hyland & Richard J. O’Connor & Frank J. Chaloupka & Ron Borland & Geoffrey T. Fong & Nigar Nargis & K. Michael Cummings, 2011. "How Do Price Minimizing Behaviors Impact Smoking Cessation? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Henry Saffer & Daniel Dench & Michael Grossman & Dhaval Dave, 2020. "E-cigarettes and adult smoking: Evidence from Minnesota," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 207-228, June.
    4. Chaloupka, Frank J. & Warner, Kenneth E., 2000. "The economics of smoking," Handbook of Health Economics, in: A. J. Culyer & J. P. Newhouse (ed.), Handbook of Health Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 29, pages 1539-1627, Elsevier.
    5. Andrea S. Licht & Andrew J. Hyland & Richard J. O’Connor & Frank J. Chaloupka & Ron Borland & Geoffrey T. Fong & Nigar Nargis & K. Michael Cummings, 2011. "Socio-Economic Variation in Price Minimizing Behaviors: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jose Angelo Divino & Philipp Ehrl & Osvaldo Candido & Marcos Aurelio Pereira Valadao, 2021. "Assessing the Effects of a Tobacco Tax Reform on the Industry Price-Setting Strategy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-12, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cotti, Chad & Courtemanche, Charles & Maclean, Joanna Catherine & Nesson, Erik & Pesko, Michael F. & Tefft, Nathan W., 2022. "The effects of e-cigarette taxes on e-cigarette prices and tobacco product sales: Evidence from retail panel data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    2. Lesley Chiou & Erich Muehlegger, 2014. "Consumer Response to Cigarette Excise Tax Changes," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 67(3), pages 621-650, September.
    3. DeCicca, Philip & Kenkel, Donald & Liu, Feng, 2013. "Excise tax avoidance: The case of state cigarette taxes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1130-1141.
    4. Jose Angelo Divino & Philipp Ehrl & Osvaldo Candido & Marcos Aurelio Pereira Valadao, 2021. "Assessing the Effects of a Tobacco Tax Reform on the Industry Price-Setting Strategy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-12, October.
    5. Andrea S. Licht & Andrew J. Hyland & Richard J. O’Connor & Frank J. Chaloupka & Ron Borland & Geoffrey T. Fong & Nigar Nargis & K. Michael Cummings, 2011. "How Do Price Minimizing Behaviors Impact Smoking Cessation? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Bishop, James, 2015. "Interacting effects of state cigarette taxes on smoking participation," MPRA Paper 66609, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Matthew C Farrelly & James M Nonnemaker & Kimberly A Watson, 2012. "The Consequences of High Cigarette Excise Taxes for Low-Income Smokers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-7, September.
    8. Leah K. Lakdawala & David Simon, 2017. "The Intergenerational Consequences of Tobacco Policy: A Review of Policy's Influence on Maternal Smoking and Child Health," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 84(1), pages 229-274, July.
    9. Kevin Callison & Robert Kaestner, 2014. "Do Higher Tobacco Taxes Reduce Adult Smoking? New Evidence Of The Effect Of Recent Cigarette Tax Increases On Adult Smoking," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 52(1), pages 155-172, January.
    10. Erik Nesson, 2017. "Heterogeneity in Smokers' Responses to Tobacco Control Policies," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 206-225, February.
    11. Dave, Dhaval & Saffer, Henry, 2013. "Demand for smokeless tobacco: Role of advertising," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 682-697.
    12. Martin Gonzalez-Rozada, 2019. "Increasing Cigarette Taxes is Unfair to the Poor? Evidence from Argentina," Department of Economics Working Papers 2019_01, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella.
    13. Michael F. Pesko & Charles J. Courtemanche & Johanna Catherine Maclean, 2020. "The effects of traditional cigarette and e-cigarette tax rates on adult tobacco product use," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 229-258, June.
    14. Hammar, Henrik & Carlsson, Fredrik, 2001. "Smokers' Decisions To Quit Smoking," Working Papers in Economics 59, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    15. Joseph P. Newhouse, 2021. "An Ounce of Prevention," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 35(2), pages 101-118, Spring.
    16. Chen, Li-Shiun & Wang, Ping & Yao, Yao, 2018. "Power of personalized smoking cessation: A unified lifecycle framework for policy evaluation," Working Paper Series 20333, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    17. Hansen, Benjamin & Sabia, Joseph J. & Rees, Daniel I., 2011. "Cigarette Taxes and the Social Market," IZA Discussion Papers 5580, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Ciccarelli, Carlo & De Fraja, Gianni & Vuri, Daniela, 2021. "Effects of passive smoking on prenatal and infant development: Lessons from the past," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    19. Tansel, Aysit & Karao?lan, Deniz, 2016. "The Causal Effect of Education on Health Behaviors: Evidence from Turkey," IZA Discussion Papers 10020, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Odermatt, Reto & Stutzer, Alois, 2018. "Tobacco Control Policies and Smoking Behavior in Europe: More Than Trends?," Working papers 2018/24, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:7835-:d:600262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.