IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i13p7115-d587740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of Nonstationary Effect on Geographically Weighted Total Least Squares Regression for PM 2.5 Estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Arezoo Mokhtari

    (Department of Geomatics Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Transportation, University of Isfahan, Isfahan 8174673441, Iran)

  • Behnam Tashayo

    (Department of Geomatics Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Transportation, University of Isfahan, Isfahan 8174673441, Iran)

  • Kaveh Deilami

    (Centre for Urban Research, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia)

Abstract

Land use regression (LUR) models are used for high-resolution air pollution assessment. These models use independent parameters based on an assumption that these parameters are accurate and invariable; however, they are observational parameters derived from measurements or modeling. Therefore, the parameters are commonly inaccurate, with nonstationary effects and variable characteristics. In this study, we propose a geographically weighted total least squares regression (GWTLSR) to model air pollution under various traffic, land use, and meteorological parameters. To improve performance, the proposed model considers the dependent and independent variables as observational parameters. The GWTLSR applies weighted total least squares in order to take into account the variable characteristics and inaccuracies of observational parameters. Moreover, the proposed model considers the nonstationary effects of parameters through geographically weighted regression (GWR). We examine the proposed model’s capabilities for predicting daily PM 2.5 concentration in Isfahan, Iran. Isfahan is a city with severe air pollution that suffers from insufficient data for modeling air pollution with conventional LUR techniques. The advantages of the model features, including consideration of the variable characteristics and inaccuracies of predictors, are precisely evaluated by comparing the GWTLSR model with ordinary least squares (OLS) and GWR models. The R 2 values estimated by the GWTLSR model during the spring and autumn are 0.84 and 0.91, respectively. The corresponding average R 2 values estimated by the OLS model during the spring and autumn are 0.74 and 0.69, respectively, and the R 2 values estimated by the GWR model are 0.76 and 0.70, respectively. The results demonstrate that the proposed functional model efficiently described the physical nature of the relationships among air pollutants and independent variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Arezoo Mokhtari & Behnam Tashayo & Kaveh Deilami, 2021. "Implications of Nonstationary Effect on Geographically Weighted Total Least Squares Regression for PM 2.5 Estimation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7115-:d:587740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7115/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7115/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xianyu Yu & Yi Wang & Ruiqing Niu & Youjian Hu, 2016. "A Combination of Geographically Weighted Regression, Particle Swarm Optimization and Support Vector Machine for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study at Wanzhou in the Three Gorges Area, Chin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-35, May.
    2. Behnam Tashayo & Abbas Alimohammadi & Mohammad Sharif, 2017. "A Hybrid Fuzzy Inference System Based on Dispersion Model for Quantitative Environmental Health Impact Assessment of Urban Transportation Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Hongyan Zhao & Guannan Geng & Qiang Zhang & Steven J. Davis & Xin Li & Yang Liu & Liqun Peng & Meng Li & Bo Zheng & Hong Huo & Lin Zhang & Daven K. Henze & Zhifu Mi & Zhu Liu & Dabo Guan & Kebin He, 2019. "Inequality of household consumption and air pollution-related deaths in China," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. A. Stewart Fotheringham & Martin Charlton & Chris Brunsdon, 1997. "Measuring Spatial Variations in Relationships with Geographically Weighted Regression," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Manfred M. Fischer & Arthur Getis (ed.), Recent Developments in Spatial Analysis, chapter 4, pages 60-82, Springer.
    5. Markovsky, Ivan & Luisa Rastello, Maria & Premoli, Amedeo & Kukush, Alexander & Van Huffel, Sabine, 2006. "The element-wise weighted total least-squares problem," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 181-209, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meelan Thondoo & David Rojas-Rueda & Joyeeta Gupta & Daniel H. de Vries & Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen, 2019. "Systematic Literature Review of Health Impact Assessments in Low and Middle-Income Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Jin, Peizhen & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Song, Malin, 2021. "Moving towards a sustainable and innovative city: Internal urban traffic accessibility and high-level innovation based on platform monitoring data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    3. Yumiao Wang & Xueling Wu & Zhangjian Chen & Fu Ren & Luwei Feng & Qingyun Du, 2019. "Optimizing the Predictive Ability of Machine Learning Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using SMOTE for Lishui City in Zhejiang Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-27, January.
    4. LE GALLO, Julie, 2000. "Econométrie spatiale 2 -Hétérogénéité spatiale," LATEC - Document de travail - Economie (1991-2003) 2001-01, LATEC, Laboratoire d'Analyse et des Techniques EConomiques, CNRS UMR 5118, Université de Bourgogne.
    5. Meina Zheng & Xiucheng Guo & Feng Liu & Jiayan Shen, 2021. "Contribution of Subway Expansions to Air Quality Improvement and the Corresponding Health Implications in Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Arturo Bujanda & Thomas M. Fullerton, 2017. "Impacts of transportation infrastructure on single-family property values," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(51), pages 5183-5199, November.
    7. Sabo, Kristian & Grahovac, Danijel & Scitovski, Rudolf, 2020. "Incremental method for multiple line detection problem — iterative reweighted approach," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 588-602.
    8. Michael Brady & Elena Irwin, 2011. "Accounting for Spatial Effects in Economic Models of Land Use: Recent Developments and Challenges Ahead," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(3), pages 487-509, March.
    9. J. Paul Elhorst, 2003. "Specification and Estimation of Spatial Panel Data Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 26(3), pages 244-268, July.
    10. Xianyu Yu & Tingting Xiong & Weiwei Jiang & Jianguo Zhou, 2023. "Comparative Assessment of the Efficacy of the Five Kinds of Models in Landslide Susceptibility Map for Factor Screening: A Case Study at Zigui-Badong in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, January.
    11. Teng Ma & Silu Zhang & Yilong Xiao & Xiaorui Liu & Minghao Wang & Kai Wu & Guofeng Shen & Chen Huang & Yan Ru Fang & Yang Xie, 2023. "Costs and health benefits of the rural energy transition to carbon neutrality in China," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Xizhe Yan & Dan Tong & Yixuan Zheng & Yang Liu & Shaoqing Chen & Xinying Qin & Chuchu Chen & Ruochong Xu & Jing Cheng & Qinren Shi & Dongsheng Zheng & Kebin He & Qiang Zhang & Yu Lei, 2024. "Cost-effectiveness uncertainty may bias the decision of coal power transitions in China," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Kousis, I. & Manni, M. & Pisello, A.L., 2022. "Environmental mobile monitoring of urban microclimates: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    14. Xianyu Yu & Yi Wang & Ruiqing Niu & Youjian Hu, 2016. "A Combination of Geographically Weighted Regression, Particle Swarm Optimization and Support Vector Machine for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study at Wanzhou in the Three Gorges Area, Chin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-35, May.
    15. Fabio Antoniou & Panos Hatzipanayotou & Michael S. Michael & Nikos Tsakiris, 2022. "Tax competition in the presence of environmental spillovers," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 29(3), pages 600-626, June.
    16. Julie Le Gallo, 2000. "Spatial econometrics (2, Spatial heterogeneity) [Econométrie spatiale (2, Hétérogénéité spatiale)]," Working Papers hal-01526969, HAL.
    17. Coro Chasco Yrigoyen, 2004. "Modelos De Heterogeneidad Espacial," Econometrics 0411004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. M. Ponziani & D. Ponziani & A. Giorgi & H. Stevenin & S. M. Ratto, 2023. "The use of machine learning techniques for a predictive model of debris flows triggered by short intense rainfall," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(1), pages 143-162, May.
    19. Ning Wang & Chang-Lin Mei & Xiao-Dong Yan, 2008. "Local Linear Estimation of Spatially Varying Coefficient Models: An Improvement on the Geographically Weighted Regression Technique," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(4), pages 986-1005, April.
    20. Maria del Carmen Pérez González & Lidia Valiente Palma, 2020. "The “business–territory” relationship of cooperative societies as compared to the conventional business sector in the region of Andalusia," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(4), pages 565-583, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7115-:d:587740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.