IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i7p2503-d342043.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Reduce Excessive Use of the Health Care Service in Medical Aid Beneficiaries: Effectiveness of Community-Based Case Management

Author

Listed:
  • Myung Ja Kim

    (Department of Resident Welfare, Hwacheon County office, Hwacheon-gun, Ganwon-do 24125, Korea)

  • Eunhee Lee

    (School of Nursing/Research Institute of Nursing Science, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do 24252, Korea)

Abstract

Community-based case management for medical aid beneficiaries was implemented in Korea to promote the rational use of medical care and stabilize the financial system. This study investigated the economic impact of community-based case management on reductions in healthcare utilization and costs. This was a program study using a national database to evaluate the effectiveness of community-based case management in changing not only healthcare utilization and costs but also client-centered outcomes using the NHI database and 198 regional databases. A total of 1741 case management clients were included in this study. The case management clients were categorized into three targeted groups and were provided individualized services according to the groups. Client-centered outcomes, such as health-related quality of life (QOL), self-care ability, and having a support system, increased after case management. Healthcare utilization and costs decreased significantly after case management. However, there was no significant difference in the decrease between the groups. An increase in healthcare utilization among medical aid beneficiaries has been observed due to the aging population and an increase in the number of recipients. To reduce healthcare utilization and costs while maintaining the health status of the beneficiaries, it is necessary to expand targeted case management.

Suggested Citation

  • Myung Ja Kim & Eunhee Lee, 2020. "How to Reduce Excessive Use of the Health Care Service in Medical Aid Beneficiaries: Effectiveness of Community-Based Case Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-10, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:7:p:2503-:d:342043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/7/2503/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/7/2503/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jungah Kim & Changwoo Shon, 2018. "The Effects of Health Coverage Schemes on Length of Stay and Preventable Hospitalization in Seoul," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-11, April.
    2. Sara J T Guilcher & Susan E Bronskill & Jun Guan & Walter P Wodchis, 2016. "Who Are the High-Cost Users? A Method for Person-Centred Attribution of Health Care Spending," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Liran Einav & Amy Finkelstein, 2018. "Moral Hazard in Health Insurance: What We Know and How We Know It," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 957-982.
    4. Jae-Hyun Kim & Kwang-Soo Lee & Ki-Bong Yoo & Eun-Cheol Park, 2015. "The Differences in Health Care Utilization between Medical Aid and Health Insurance: A Longitudinal Study Using Propensity Score Matching," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Fukushima, Kazuya & Mizuoka, Sou & Yamamoto, Shunsuke & Iizuka, Toshiaki, 2016. "Patient cost sharing and medical expenditures for the Elderly," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 115-130.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeonghyun Cho & Kyungin Jeong & Samsook Kim & Hyejin Kim, 2019. "Exploring the Healthcare Seeking Behavior of Medical Aid Beneficiaries Who Overutilize Healthcare Services: A Qualitative Descriptive Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-9, July.
    2. Johansson, Naimi & de New, Sonja C. & Kunz, Johannes S. & Petrie, Dennis & Svensson, Mikael, 2023. "Reductions in out-of-pocket prices and forward-looking moral hazard in health care demand," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. Hernæs, Øystein & Kverndokk, Snorre & Markussen, Simen & Øien, Henning, 2023. "When health trumps money: Economic incentives and health equity in the public provision of nursing homes in Norway," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    4. Hye Yin Park & Yun-Chul Hong & Ichiro Kawachi & Juhwan Oh, 2018. "Gaps in universal health coverage in South Korea: Association with depression onset in a community cohort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-11, June.
    5. Minke Remmerswaal & Jan Boone & Rudy Douven, 2019. "Selection and moral hazard effects in healthcare," CPB Discussion Paper 393.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    6. Nathaniel Hendren & Camille Landais & Johannes Spinnewijn, 2021. "Choice in Insurance Markets: A Pigouvian Approach to Social Insurance Design," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 457-486, August.
    7. Toshiaki Iizuka & Hitoshi Shigeoka, 2020. "Asymmetric Demand Response when Prices Increase and Decrease: The Case of Child Healthcare," NBER Working Papers 28057, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Mengna Luan & Wenjing Shi & Zhigang Tao & Hongjie Yuan, 2023. "When patients have better insurance coverage in China: Provider incentives, costs, and quality of care," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 1073-1106, October.
    9. Timothy J. Halliday & Randall Q. Akee, 2020. "The impact of Medicaid on medical utilization in a vulnerable population: Evidence from COFA migrants," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(10), pages 1231-1250, October.
    10. Patrick Carlin & Brian E. Dixon & Kosali I. Simon & Ryan Sullivan & Coady Wing, 2022. "How Undervalued is the Covid-19 Vaccine? Evidence from Discrete Choice Experiments and VSL Benchmarks," NBER Working Papers 30118, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Iizuka, Toshiaki & Uchida, Gyo, 2017. "Promoting innovation in small markets: Evidence from the market for rare and intractable diseases," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 56-65.
    12. Hsing-Wen Han & Hsien-Ming Lien & Tzu-Ting Yang, 2020. "Patient Cost-Sharing and Healthcare Utilization in Early Childhood: Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 12(3), pages 238-278, August.
    13. Bardey, David & De Donder, Philippe & Mantilla, César, 2019. "How is the trade-off between adverse selection and discrimination risk affected by genetic testing? Theory and experiment," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Reona Hagiwara, 2022. "Welfare Effects of Health Insurance Reform: The Role of Elastic Medical Demand," IMES Discussion Paper Series 22-E-05, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan.
    15. Toshiaki Iizuka & Hitoshi Shigeoka, 2018. "Free for Children? Patient Cost-sharing and Healthcare Utilization," NBER Working Papers 25306, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Elina Jussila & Kaisa Kotakorpi & Jouko Verho, 2022. "Prescription Behavior of Physicians in the Public and Private Sector," CESifo Working Paper Series 10186, CESifo.
    17. Bardey, David & De Donder, Philippe, 2019. "A Welfare Analysis of Genetic Testing in Health Insurance Markets with Adverse Selection and Prevention," TSE Working Papers 19-1035, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised 22 Jan 2024.
    18. Fredens, Mia & Terkildsen, Morten Deleuran & Bollerup, Stina & Albæk, Jens & Nissen, Nina Konstantin & Winther, Susanne & Grønkjær, Mette & Rasmussen, Maja Kjær & Benthien, Kirstine Skov & Toft, Ulla , 2020. "The national implementation of 'Proactive Health Support' in Denmark since 2017: Expectations and challenges for the telephone-based self-management program," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(7), pages 674-678.
    19. Mingming Xu & Benjamin Bittschi, 2022. "Does the abolition of copayment increase ambulatory care utilization?: a quasi-experimental study in Germany," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(8), pages 1319-1328, November.
    20. Remmerswaal, Minke & Boone, Jan & Douven, Rudy, 2023. "Minimum generosity levels in a competitive health insurance market," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:7:p:2503-:d:342043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.