IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i10p2220-d174817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Organic Loading Rate on Anaerobic Digestion Performance of Mesophilic (UASB) Reactor Using Cattle Slaughterhouse Wastewater as Substrate

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Ali Musa

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
    Department of Civil and Water Resources Engineering, University of Maiduguri, P.M.B., Maiduguri 1069, Borno State, Nigeria)

  • Syazwani Idrus

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Che Man Hasfalina

    (Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Nik Norsyahariati Nik Daud

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia)

Abstract

In this study, the performance of a laboratory scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor operating at mesophilic temperature (35 °C) was examined. Cattle slaughterhouse wastewater (CSWW) was used as the main substrate. The total and effective volumes of the reactor were 8 L and 6 L, respectively. Twelve different organic loading rates (OLR) were applied and the performance was evaluated. The chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency was more than 90% during batch study. In the continuous study, COD removal was also approximately 90% at OLR 0.4 g/L d −1 which subsequently dropped to below 50% when the loading rate increased to 15 g/L d −1 . Approximately 5 L/d of biogas was obtained with high methane concentration at stages VI and XI corresponding to OLR of 2 and 10 g/L d −1 , respectively. It was observed that the concentration of volatile fatty acids was low and that the alkalinity of the wastewater was sufficient to avoid acidification. Specific methane yields of 0.36 and 0.38 LCH 4 /g COD added were achieved at OLR 7 and 10 g/L d −1 . A hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 1 day was sufficient to remove greater than 70% of COD which correspond to 89% methane concentration. Parameters like soluble COD, NH 3 -N, pH, alkalinity, total suspended solid (TSS), fats, oil, and grease were also investigated. The results show that the UASB reactor could serve as a good alternative for anaerobic treatment of CSWW and methane production.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Ali Musa & Syazwani Idrus & Che Man Hasfalina & Nik Norsyahariati Nik Daud, 2018. "Effect of Organic Loading Rate on Anaerobic Digestion Performance of Mesophilic (UASB) Reactor Using Cattle Slaughterhouse Wastewater as Substrate," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:10:p:2220-:d:174817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/10/2220/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/10/2220/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Cheng & Guo, Wenshan & Ngo, Huu Hao & Lee, Duu-Jong & Tung, Kuo-Lun & Jin, Pengkang & Wang, Jie & Wu, Yun, 2016. "Challenges in biogas production from anaerobic membrane bioreactors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 120-134.
    2. Mohammed Ali Musa & Syazwani Idrus & Hasfalina Che Man & Nik Norsyahariati Nik Daud, 2018. "Wastewater Treatment and Biogas Recovery Using Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (AnMBRs): Strategies and Achievements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Ihsan Hamawand & Anas Ghadouani & Jochen Bundschuh & Sara Hamawand & Raed A. Al Juboori & Sayan Chakrabarty & Talal Yusaf, 2017. "A Critical Review on Processes and Energy Profile of the Australian Meat Processing Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-29, May.
    4. Tangkathitipong, Pranee & Intanoo, Patcharee & Butpan, Janyawan & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2017. "Separate production of hydrogen and methane from biodiesel wastewater with added glycerin by two-stage anaerobic sequencing batch reactors (ASBR)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1077-1085.
    5. Cirne, D.G. & Paloumet, X. & Björnsson, L. & Alves, M.M. & Mattiasson, B., 2007. "Anaerobic digestion of lipid-rich waste—Effects of lipid concentration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 965-975.
    6. A. C. Marcos & A. Al-Kassir & Francisco Cuadros & Talal Yusaf, 2017. "Treatment of Slaughterhouse Waste Water Mixed with Serum from Lacteal Industry of Extremadura in Spain to Produce Clean Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Claudinei De Souza Guimarães & David Rodrigues da Silva Maia & Eduardo Gonçalves Serra, 2018. "Construction of Biodigesters to Optimize the Production of Biogas from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste and Sewage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-10, April.
    8. Hamidi Abdul Aziz & Nur Nasuha Ahmad Puat & Motasem Y. D. Alazaiza & Yung-Tse Hung, 2018. "Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Treatment Using Submerged Fibers in an Attached Growth Sequential Batch Reactor," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-12, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Khalish Mohammad Ilias & Md. Sohrab Hossain & Rahmat Ngteni & Adel Al-Gheethi & Harlina Ahmad & Fatehah Mohd Omar & Mu. Naushad & Sadanand Pandey, 2021. "Environmental Remediation Potential of Ferrous Sulfate Waste as an Eco-Friendly Coagulant for the Removal of NH 3 -N and COD from the Rubber Processing Effluent," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Mohammed Ali Musa & Syazwani Idrus & Mohd Razif Harun & Tuan Farhana Tuan Mohd Marzuki & Abdul Malek Abdul Wahab, 2019. "A Comparative Study of Biogas Production from Cattle Slaughterhouse Wastewater Using Conventional and Modified Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) Reactors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Seung Gu Shin & Su In Kim & Seokhwan Hwang, 2022. "Startup of Demo-Scale Anaerobic Digestion Plant Treating Food Waste Leachate: Process Instability and Recovery," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-10, June.
    4. Sakulrat Sutthiprapa & Sirintornthep Towprayoon & Chart Chiemchaisri & Pawinee Chaiprasert & Komsilp Wangyao, 2024. "Optimizing an Anaerobic Hybrid Reactor Series for Effective High-Strength Fresh Leachate Treatment and Biogas Generation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-13, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Spyridon Achinas & Johan Horjus & Vasileios Achinas & Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, 2019. "A PESTLE Analysis of Biofuels Energy Industry in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Béchir Wanassi & Ichrak Ben Hariz & Camélia Matei Ghimbeu & Cyril Vaulot & Mejdi Jeguirim, 2017. "Green Carbon Composite-Derived Polymer Resin and Waste Cotton Fibers for the Removal of Alizarin Red S Dye," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Omar Alagha & Ahmed Allazem & Alaadin A. Bukhari & Ismail Anil & Nuhu Dalhat Mu'azu, 2020. "Suitability of SBR for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse: Pilot-Scale Reactor Operated in Different Anoxic Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Sánchez-Bayo, Alejandra & López-Chicharro, Daniel & Morales, Victoria & Espada, Juan José & Puyol, Daniel & Martínez, Fernando & Astals, Sergi & Vicente, Gemma & Bautista, Luis Fernando & Rodríguez, R, 2020. "Biodiesel and biogas production from Isochrysis galbana using dry and wet lipid extraction: A biorefinery approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 188-195.
    5. Jiraprasertwong, Achiraya & Maitriwong, Kiatchai & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2019. "Production of biogas from cassava wastewater using a three-stage upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 191-205.
    6. Roopnarain, Ashira & Rama, Haripriya & Ndaba, Busiswa & Bello-Akinosho, Maryam & Bamuza-Pemu, Emomotimi & Adeleke, Rasheed, 2021. "Unravelling the anaerobic digestion ‘black box’: Biotechnological approaches for process optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    7. Renata Toczyłowska-Mamińska & Mariusz Ł. Mamiński, 2022. "Wastewater as a Renewable Energy Source—Utilisation of Microbial Fuel Cell Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Magdalena Zielińska & Adenike Ojo, 2023. "Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (AnMBRs) for Wastewater Treatment: Recovery of Nutrients and Energy, and Management of Fouling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Li, Yangyang & Jin, Yiying & Li, Hailong & Borrion, Aiduan & Yu, Zhixin & Li, Jinhui, 2018. "Kinetic studies on organic degradation and its impacts on improving methane production during anaerobic digestion of food waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 136-147.
    10. Salah Jellali & Yassine Charabi & Muhammad Usman & Abdullah Al-Badi & Mejdi Jeguirim, 2021. "Investigations on Biogas Recovery from Anaerobic Digestion of Raw Sludge and Its Mixture with Agri-Food Wastes: Application to the Largest Industrial Estate in Oman," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Sofia Chaudry & Arsalan Alavianghavanini & Pooya Darvehei & Navid R. Moheimani & Parisa A. Bahri, 2024. "Feasibility of Nutrient Removal and Recovery from Abattoir Wastewater Using Microalgae," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-16, January.
    12. Valerii Havrysh & Antonina Kalinichenko & Grzegorz Mentel & Tadeusz Olejarz, 2020. "Commercial Biogas Plants: Lessons for Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    13. Sanjaya, Adhitya Pitara & Cahyanto, Muhammad Nur & Millati, Ria, 2016. "Mesophilic batch anaerobic digestion from fruit fragments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 135-141.
    14. Singh, Anoop & Olsen, Stig Irving, 2011. "A critical review of biochemical conversion, sustainability and life cycle assessment of algal biofuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(10), pages 3548-3555.
    15. Francis Kemausuor & Muyiwa S. Adaramola & John Morken, 2018. "A Review of Commercial Biogas Systems and Lessons for Africa," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Spyridon Achinas & Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, 2019. "Effect of Combined Inoculation on Biogas Production from Hardly Degradable Material," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, January.
    17. O-Thong, Sompong & Boe, Kanokwan & Angelidaki, Irini, 2012. "Thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of oil palm empty fruit bunches with palm oil mill effluent for efficient biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 648-654.
    18. Vinardell, S. & Astals, S. & Peces, M. & Cardete, M.A. & Fernández, I. & Mata-Alvarez, J. & Dosta, J., 2020. "Advances in anaerobic membrane bioreactor technology for municipal wastewater treatment: A 2020 updated review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    19. Kessara Seneesrisakul & Twarath Sutabutr & Sumaeth Chavadej, 2018. "The Effect of Temperature on the Methanogenic Activity in Relation to Micronutrient Availability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Appels, Lise & Lauwers, Joost & Degrève, Jan & Helsen, Lieve & Lievens, Bart & Willems, Kris & Van Impe, Jan & Dewil, Raf, 2011. "Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production: Potential and research challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4295-4301.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:10:p:2220-:d:174817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.