IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v17y2025i5p205-d1648886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Securing Blockchain Systems: A Layer-Oriented Survey of Threats, Vulnerability Taxonomy, and Detection Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Jaminur Islam

    (Department of Computer Science, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Saminur Islam

    (Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Mahmud Hossain

    (Department of Private Certificate Authority, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Herndon, VA 20171, USA)

  • Shahid Noor

    (Department of Computer Science, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY 41099, USA)

  • S. M. Riazul Islam

    (School of Natural and Computing Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK)

Abstract

Blockchain technology is emerging as a pivotal framework to enhance the security of internet-based systems, especially as advancements in machine learning (ML), artificial intelligence (AI), and cyber–physical systems such as smart grids and IoT applications in healthcare continue to accelerate. Although these innovations promise significant improvements, security remains a critical challenge. Blockchain offers a secure foundation for integrating diverse technologies; however, vulnerabilities—including adversarial exploits—can undermine performance and compromise application reliability. To address these risks effectively, it is essential to comprehensively analyze the vulnerability landscape of blockchain systems. This paper contributes in two key ways. First, it presents a unique layer-based framework for analyzing and illustrating security attacks within blockchain architectures. Second, it introduces a novel taxonomy that classifies existing research on blockchain vulnerability detection. Our analysis reveals that while ML and deep learning offer promising approaches for detecting vulnerabilities, their effectiveness often depends on access to extensive and high-quality datasets. Additionally, the layer-based framework demonstrates that vulnerabilities span all layers of a blockchain system, with attacks frequently targeting the consensus process, network integrity, and smart contract code. Overall, this paper provides a comprehensive overview of blockchain security threats and detection methods, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to safeguard these evolving systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Jaminur Islam & Saminur Islam & Mahmud Hossain & Shahid Noor & S. M. Riazul Islam, 2025. "Securing Blockchain Systems: A Layer-Oriented Survey of Threats, Vulnerability Taxonomy, and Detection Methods," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-36, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:205-:d:1648886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/5/205/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/5/205/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sepideh Mollajafari & Kamal Bechkoum, 2023. "Blockchain Technology and Related Security Risks: Towards a Seven-Layer Perspective and Taxonomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Huru Hasanova & Ui‐jun Baek & Mu‐gon Shin & Kyunghee Cho & Myung‐Sup Kim, 2019. "A survey on blockchain cybersecurity vulnerabilities and possible countermeasures," International Journal of Network Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Guillaume Dumas & Sonia Jimenez-Garcès & Florentina Șoiman, 2021. "Blockchain technology and crypto-assets market analysis: vulnerabilities and risk assessment," Working Papers hal-03112920, HAL.
    2. Milunovich, George & Lee, Seung Ah, 2022. "Measuring the impact of digital exchange cyberattacks on Bitcoin Returns," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    3. Say Keat Ooi & Chai Aun Ooi & Jasmine A. L. Yeap & Tok Hao Goh, 2021. "Embracing Bitcoin: users’ perceived security and trust," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1219-1237, August.
    4. Karim Zkik & Anass Sebbar & Oumaima Fadi & Sachin Kamble & Amine Belhadi, 2024. "Securing blockchain-based crowdfunding platforms: an integrated graph neural networks and machine learning approach," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 497-533, March.
    5. Faheem Ahmad Reegu & Hafiza Abas & Yonis Gulzar & Qin Xin & Ali A. Alwan & Abdoh Jabbari & Rahul Ganpatrao Sonkamble & Rudzidatul Akmam Dziyauddin, 2023. "Blockchain-Based Framework for Interoperable Electronic Health Records for an Improved Healthcare System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Jean-Guillaume Dumas & Sonia Jimenez-Garces & Florentina Șoiman, 2021. "Risk analyses of the crypto-market: A literature review," Post-Print hal-03112920, HAL.
    7. Alya Ayuniey Mohd Fairoh & Nurul Najihah Hussin & Nur Aina Arisha Jamali & MAZURINA MOHD ALI, 2024. "The Impact of Blockchain in Financial Industry: A Concept Paper," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(1), pages 190-196.
    8. Md Kamrul Siam & Bilash Saha & Md Mehedi Hasan & Md Jobair Hossain Faruk & Nafisa Anjum & Sharaban Tahora & Aiasha Siddika & Hossain Shahriar, 2025. "Securing Decentralized Ecosystems: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Blockchain Vulnerabilities, Attacks, and Countermeasures and Mitigation Strategies," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-41, April.
    9. Yao Du & Zehua Wang & Victor C. M. Leung, 2021. "Blockchain-Enabled Edge Intelligence for IoT: Background, Emerging Trends and Open Issues," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Taab Ahmad Samad & Rohit Sharma & Kunal K Ganguly & Samuel Fosso Wamba & Geetika Jain, 2023. "Enablers to the adoption of blockchain technology in logistics supply chains: evidence from an emerging economy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(1), pages 251-291, August.
    11. Li, Lixu & Chen, Lujie & Liu, Yaoqi, 2024. "Digital governance for supplier opportunism: The mediating role of supplier transparency," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    12. Yang, Shengyao & Zhu, Meng Nan & Yu, Haiyan, 2024. "Are artificial intelligence and blockchain the key to unlocking the box of clean energy?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:205-:d:1648886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.