IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v14y2022i9p269-d918549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Low Power Blockchained E-Vote Platform for University Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Faten Chaabane

    (Computer Sciences Department, ENIS, University of Sfax, Sfax 3029, Tunisia)

  • Jalel Ktari

    (CES Lab, ENIS, University of Sfax, Sfax 3029, Tunisia)

  • Tarek Frikha

    (CES Lab, ENIS, University of Sfax, Sfax 3029, Tunisia)

  • Habib Hamam

    (Faculty of Engineering, Uni de Moncton, Moncton, NB E1A3E9, Canada
    Spectrum of Knowledge Production & Skills Development, Sfax 3027, Tunisia
    International Institute of Technology and Management, Libreville BP1989, Gabon
    Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Science, School of Electrical Engineering, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

Abstract

With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the succession of its waves, the transmission of this disease and the number of deaths caused by it have been increasing. Despite the various vaccines, the COVID-19 virus is still contagious and dangerous for affected people. One of the remedies to this is precaution, and particularly social distancing. In the same vein, this paper proposes a remote voting system, which has to be secure, anonymous, irreversible, accessible, and simple to use. It therefore allows voters to have the possibility to vote for their candidate without having to perform the operation on site. This system will be used for university elections and particularly for student elections. We propose a platform based on a decentralized system. This system will use two blockchains communicating with each other: the public Ethereum blockchain and the private Quorum blockchain. The private blockchain will be institution-specific. All these blockchains send the necessary data to the public blockchain which manages different data related to the universities and the ministry. This system enables using encrypted data with the SHA-256 algorithm to have both security and information security. Motivated by the high energy consumption of blockchain and by the performance improvements in low-power, a test is performed on a low-power embedded platform Raspberry PI4 showing the possibility to use the Blockchain with limited resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Faten Chaabane & Jalel Ktari & Tarek Frikha & Habib Hamam, 2022. "Low Power Blockchained E-Vote Platform for University Environment," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:269-:d:918549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/14/9/269/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/14/9/269/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Ying & Wu, Yanpeng & Cimen, Halil & Vasquez, Juan C. & Guerrero, Josep M., 2022. "Towards collective energy Community: Potential roles of microgrid and blockchain to go beyond P2P energy trading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    2. Andry Alamsyah & Naufal Hakim & Ratih Hendayani, 2022. "Blockchain-Based Traceability System to Support the Indonesian Halal Supply Chain Ecosystem," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Valentina Gatteschi & Fabrizio Lamberti & Claudio Demartini & Chiara Pranteda & Víctor Santamaría, 2018. "Blockchain and Smart Contracts for Insurance: Is the Technology Mature Enough?," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Mohannad Alobid & Said Abujudeh & István Szűcs, 2022. "The Role of Blockchain in Revolutionizing the Agricultural Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Xiuli Wang & Fang Yao & Fushuan Wen, 2022. "Applications of Blockchain Technology in Modern Power Systems: A Brief Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arsenii Vilkov & Gang Tian, 2023. "Blockchain’s Scope and Purpose in Carbon Markets: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    2. Matteo Vaccargiu & Andrea Pinna & Roberto Tonelli & Luisanna Cocco, 2023. "Blockchain in the Energy Sector for SDG Achievement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Yaroslav Kichuk & Tetyana Semigina & Vadim Zubov & Valentyna Tokareva & Yurii Shtyka & NataliÑ–a Holiachuk, 2022. "Employment in the Agricultural Sector in the Coordinates of the Digital Economy: New Parameters and Strategic Vectors of Social Policy," Journal of Agriculture and Crops, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 8(4), pages 259-265, 10-2022.
    4. Sachin Kumar Mangla & Yiğit Kazançoğlu & Abdullah Yıldızbaşı & Cihat Öztürk & Ahmet Çalık, 2022. "A conceptual framework for blockchain‐based sustainable supply chain and evaluating implementation barriers: A case of the tea supply chain," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(8), pages 3693-3716, December.
    5. Sima, Catalina Alexandra & Popescu, Claudia Laurenta & Popescu, Mihai Octavian & Roscia, Mariacristina & Seritan, George & Panait, Cornel, 2022. "Techno-economic assessment of university energy communities with on/off microgrid," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 538-553.
    6. Barbara Antonioli Mantegazzini & C?dric Clastres & Laura Wangen, 2022. "Energy communities in Europe: An overview of issues and regulatory and economic solutions," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(2), pages 5-23.
    7. Martin Eling & Davide Nuessle & Julian Staubli, 2022. "The impact of artificial intelligence along the insurance value chain and on the insurability of risks," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(2), pages 205-241, April.
    8. Mousa Mohammed Khubrani & Shadab Alam, 2023. "Blockchain-Based Microgrid for Safe and Reliable Power Generation and Distribution: A Case Study of Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-34, August.
    9. Khan, Nida & Kchouri, Bilal & Yatoo, Nissar Ahmad & Kräussl, Zsofia & Patel, Anass & State, Radu, 2022. "Tokenization of sukuk: Ethereum case study," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    10. Marina Bertolini & Gregorio Morosinotto, 2023. "Business Models for Energy Community in the Aggregator Perspective: State of the Art and Research Gaps," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-26, June.
    11. Christian Eckert & Christof Neunsinger & Katrin Osterrieder, 2022. "Managing customer satisfaction: digital applications for insurance companies," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(3), pages 569-602, July.
    12. Cesar Diaz-Londono & José Vuelvas & Giambattista Gruosso & Carlos Adrian Correa-Florez, 2022. "Remuneration Sensitivity Analysis in Prosumer and Aggregator Strategies by Controlling Electric Vehicle Chargers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    13. Andreolli, Francesca & D'Alpaos, Chiara & Kort, Peter, 2023. "Does P2P Trading Favor Investments in PV-Battery Systems?," FEEM Working Papers 330498, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    14. Barbara Marchetti & Matteo Vitali & Giovanni Biancini, 2024. "Renewable Energy Proliferation and the New Local Energy Community Paradigm: Analysis of a Case Study in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Cerchione, Roberto & Centobelli, Piera & Riccio, Emanuela & Abbate, Stefano & Oropallo, Eugenio, 2023. "Blockchain’s coming to hospital to digitalize healthcare services: Designing a distributed electronic health record ecosystem," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    16. Yeray Mezquita & Ana Belén Gil-González & Angel Martín del Rey & Javier Prieto & Juan Manuel Corchado, 2022. "Towards a Blockchain-Based Peer-to-Peer Energy Marketplace," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Qingfeng Zhu & Rui Zong & Mengqi Xu, 2023. "Three-Party Stochastic Evolutionary Game Analysis of Supply Chain Finance Based on Blockchain Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    18. La Ode Nazaruddin & Balázs Gyenge & Maria Fekete-Farkas & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "The Future Direction of Halal Food Additive and Ingredient Research in Economics and Business: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-40, March.
    19. Antonio Fusco & Grazia Dicuonzo & Vittorio Dell’Atti & Marco Tatullo, 2020. "Blockchain in Healthcare: Insights on COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-12, September.
    20. Sławomir Bielecki & Tadeusz Skoczkowski & Lidia Sobczak & Marcin Wołowicz, 2022. "Electricity Usage Settlement System Based on a Cryptocurrency Instrument," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-35, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:269-:d:918549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.