IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jforec/v4y2022i3p35-673d866295.html

Modelling Financial Markets during Times of Extreme Volatility: Evidence from the GameStop Short Squeeze

Author

Listed:
  • Boris Andreev

    (Data Engineering Department, GfK Bulgaria, 47A Tsarigradsko Shosse Blvd, 2nd Floor, 1124 Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Georgios Sermpinis

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, West Quadrangle, Gilbert Scott Building, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK)

  • Charalampos Stasinakis

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, West Quadrangle, Gilbert Scott Building, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK)

Abstract

Ever since the start of the coronavirus pandemic, lockdowns to curb the spread of the virus have resulted in an increased interest of retail investors in the stock market, due to more free time, capital, and commission-free trading brokerages. This interest culminated in the January 2021 short squeeze wave, caused in no small part due to the coordinated trading moves of the r/WallStreetBets subreddit, which has rapidly grown in user base since the event. In this paper, we attempt to discover if coordinated trading by retail investors can make them a market moving force and attempt to identify proactive signals of such movements in the post activity of the forum, to be used as a part of a trading strategy. Data about the most mentioned stocks is collected, aggregated, combined with price data for the respective stock and analysed. Additionally, we utilise predictive modelling to be able to better classify trading signals. It is discovered that despite the considerable capital that retail investors can direct by coordinating their trading moves, additional factors, such as very high short interest, need to be present to achieve the volatility seen in the short squeeze wave. Furthermore, we find that autoregressive models are better suited to identifying signals correctly, with best results achieved by a Random Forest classifier. However, it became apparent that even the best performing model in our experimentation cannot make accurate predictions in extreme volatility, evidenced by the negative returns shown by conducted back-tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Boris Andreev & Georgios Sermpinis & Charalampos Stasinakis, 2022. "Modelling Financial Markets during Times of Extreme Volatility: Evidence from the GameStop Short Squeeze," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:4:y:2022:i:3:p:35-673:d:866295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9394/4/3/35/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9394/4/3/35/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Umar, Zaghum & Gubareva, Mariya & Yousaf, Imran & Ali, Shoaib, 2021. "A tale of company fundamentals vs sentiment driven pricing: The case of GameStop," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    2. Thomas Renault, 2017. "Intraday online investor sentiment and return patterns in the U.S. stock market," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-03205113, HAL.
    3. Tolga Buz & Gerard de Melo, 2021. "Should You Take Investment Advice From WallStreetBets? A Data-Driven Approach," Papers 2105.02728, arXiv.org.
    4. Daniel Bradley & Jan Hanousek & Russell Jame & Zicheng Xiao, 2021. "Place your bets? The market consequences of investment advice on Reddit’s Wallstreetbets," MENDELU Working Papers in Business and Economics 2021-76, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    5. Avery, Christopher & Zemsky, Peter, 1998. "Multidimensional Uncertainty and Herd Behavior in Financial Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 88(4), pages 724-748, September.
    6. Nam, Kiseok & Pyun, Chong Soo & Avard, Stephen L., 2001. "Asymmetric reverting behavior of short-horizon stock returns: An evidence of stock market overreaction," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 807-824, April.
    7. Renault, Thomas, 2017. "Intraday online investor sentiment and return patterns in the U.S. stock market," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 25-40.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suchanek, Max, 2024. "Social interactions in short squeeze scenarios," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 898-919.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Münster, Markus & Reichenbach, Felix & Walther, Martin, 2024. "Robinhood, Reddit, and the news: The impact of traditional and social media on retail investor trading," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. Tolga Buz & Gerard de Melo, 2022. "Democratization of Retail Trading: Can Reddit's WallStreetBets Outperform Investment Bank Analysts?," Papers 2301.00170, arXiv.org.
    3. Suwan (Cheng) Long & Brian Lucey & Ying Xie & Larisa Yarovaya, 2023. "“I just like the stock”: The role of Reddit sentiment in the GameStop share rally," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 58(1), pages 19-37, February.
    4. Tamara Teplova & Maksim Fayzulin, 2025. "Decoding Russian stock market trends through ensemble methods and sentiment analysis of social media," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 353(3), pages 1123-1172, October.
    5. Zhao, Yan & Su, Kun, 2022. "Economic policy uncertainty and corporate financialization: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Ren, Tingting & Li, Shaofang, 2025. "Stock market forecasting based on machine learning: The role of investor sentiment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 666(C).
    7. Bao, Te & Ma, Mengzhong & Wen, Yonggang, 2023. "Herding in the non-fungible token (NFT) market," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    8. Jang, Junkyu, 2025. "Selective news selection model for explainable stock prediction via cross-attention integration," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(PD).
    9. Tang, Zhenpeng & Lin, Qiaofeng & Cai, Yi & Chen, Kaijie & Liu, Dinggao, 2024. "Harnessing the power of real-time forum opinion: Unveiling its impact on stock market dynamics using intraday high-frequency data in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Hasso, Tim & Müller, Daniel & Pelster, Matthias & Warkulat, Sonja, 2022. "Who participated in the GameStop frenzy? Evidence from brokerage accounts," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    11. André Betzer & Jan Philipp Harries, 2022. "How online discussion board activity affects stock trading: the case of GameStop," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 36(4), pages 443-472, December.
    12. Shen, Yiran & Liu, Chang & Sun, Xiaolei & Guo, Kun, 2023. "Investor sentiment and the Chinese new energy stock market: A risk–return perspective," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 395-408.
    13. Zhang, Ailian & Pan, Mengmeng & Zhang, Xuan, 2025. "The pricing ability of factor model based on machine learning: Evidence from high-frequency data in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    14. Liu, Wenwen & Zhang, Chang & Qiao, Gaoxiu & Xu, Lei, 2022. "Impact of network investor sentiment and news arrival on jumps," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    15. Saurabh, Samant & Dey, Kushankur, 2020. "Unraveling the relationship between social moods and the stock market: Evidence from the United Kingdom," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    16. Zhang, Junsheng & Peng, Zezhi & Zeng, Yamin & Yang, Haisheng, 2023. "Do big data mutual funds outperform?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    17. Zeitun, Rami & Rehman, Mobeen Ur & Ahmad, Nasir & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2023. "The impact of Twitter-based sentiment on US sectoral returns," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    18. Jianfei Zhang & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2023. "Towards systematic intraday news screening: a liquidity-focused approach," Papers 2304.05115, arXiv.org.
    19. Alexis Bogroff & Dominique Guégan, 2019. "Artificial Intelligence, Data, Ethics. An Holistic Approach for Risks and Regulation," Working Papers 2019: 19, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    20. Todd, Andrew & Bowden, James & Cummins, Mark & Su, Yang, 2025. "A multimodal sentiment classifier for financial decision making," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:4:y:2022:i:3:p:35-673:d:866295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.