IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jfinte/v4y2025i2p26-d1679603.html

The Role of Regulatory Sandboxes in FinTech Innovation: A Comparative Case Study of the UK, Singapore, and Hungary

Author

Listed:
  • János Kálmán

    (Ferenc Deák Faculty of Law and Political Science, István Széchenyi University, H-9026 Győr, Hungary)

Abstract

Regulatory sandboxes have emerged as policy instruments designed to support FinTech innovation while maintaining supervisory oversight. By allowing firms to test financial products in controlled environments, sandboxes aim to reduce regulatory uncertainty and facilitate market entry. Despite their growing adoption, empirical evidence of their effectiveness remains limited, particularly in emerging markets. This study explores the impact of regulatory sandboxes on innovation and market access through a qualitative comparative case study of the United Kingdom, Singapore, and Hungary. Drawing on document analysis and thematic coding, the research evaluates sandbox design, regulatory support, and innovation outcomes across the three jurisdictions. Findings show that sandboxes enhance access to funding, accelerate product development, and foster regulator–firm collaboration. While the UK and Singapore benefit from mature ecosystems and structured frameworks, Hungary illustrates sandbox potential in developing markets. The paper contributes to FinTech regulation literature and provides policy recommendations for optimizing sandbox design across varied institutional contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • János Kálmán, 2025. "The Role of Regulatory Sandboxes in FinTech Innovation: A Comparative Case Study of the UK, Singapore, and Hungary," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:4:y:2025:i:2:p:26-:d:1679603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/4/2/26/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/4/2/26/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng, Yulu & Wu, Xiaoli, 2024. "Fostering fintech innovation: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis of regulatory sandbox experiments," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 1302-1320.
    2. Giulio Cornelli & Sebastian Doerr & Leonardo Gambacorta & Ouarda Merrouche, 2024. "Regulatory Sandboxes and Fintech Funding: Evidence from the UK," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 28(1), pages 203-233.
    3. Christopher Chen, 2020. "Rethinking the Regulatory Sandbox for Financial Innovation: An Assessment of the UK and Singapore," Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation, in: Mark Fenwick & Steven Van Uytsel & Bi Ying (ed.), Regulating FinTech in Asia, pages 11-30, Springer.
    4. Anagnostopoulos, Ioannis, 2018. "Fintech and regtech: Impact on regulators and banks," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 7-25.
    5. Wendy McCallum & Meshach J. Aziakpono, 2023. "Regulatory sandbox for FinTech regulation: Do the conditions for effective adoption exist in South Africa?," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 1100-1116, September.
    6. Drago, Carlo & Minnetti, Francesco & Di Nallo, Loris & Manzari, Alberto, 2025. "Uncovering patterns of fintech behavior in Italian banks: A multidimensional statistical analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chao, Xiangrui & Ran, Qin & Chen, Jia & Li, Tie & Qian, Qian & Ergu, Daji, 2022. "Regulatory technology (Reg-Tech) in financial stability supervision: Taxonomy, key methods, applications and future directions," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Liang Huang & Jinyi Qin & Yan Chen, 2025. "Strategic Offerings of Return Freight Insurance by Insurers in Monopolistic and Duopolistic Markets," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Mustafa Raza Rabbani & Shahnawaz Khan & Eleftherios I. Thalassinos, 2020. "FinTech, Blockchain and Islamic Finance: An Extensive Literature Review," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 65-86.
    4. Juan F. Prados-Castillo & Miguel Ángel Solano-Sánchez & Pilar Guaita Fernández & José Manuel Guaita Martínez, 2023. "Potential of the Crypto Economy in Financial Management and Fundraising for Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Ting Yao & Liangrong Song, 2023. "Fintech and the economic capital of Chinese commercial bank's risk: Based on theory and evidence," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 2109-2123, April.
    6. Zhang, Yujin & Ye, Shujun & Liu, Jie & Du, Lihong, 2023. "Impact of the development of FinTech by commercial banks on bank credit risk," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    7. Patrick Bernard Washington & Shafiq Ur Rehman & Ernesto Lee, 2022. "Nexus between Regulatory Sandbox and Performance of Digital Banks—A Study on UK Digital Banks," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Daniel Levis & Francesco Fontana & Elisa Ughetto, 2021. "A look into the future of blockchain technology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Rahul Singh Gautam & Shailesh Rastogi & Aashi Rawal & Venkata Mrudula Bhimavarapu & Jagjeevan Kanoujiya & Samaksh Rastogi, 2022. "Financial Technology and Its Impact on Digital Literacy in India: Using Poverty as a Moderating Variable," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Morshadul Hasan & Thuhid Noor & Jiechao Gao & Muhammad Usman & Mohammad Zoynul Abedin, 2023. "Rural Consumers’ Financial Literacy and Access to FinTech Services," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 780-804, June.
    11. Ahmad Alaassar & Anne-Laure Mention & Tor Helge Aas, 2022. "Ecosystem dynamics: exploring the interplay within fintech entrepreneurial ecosystems," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 2157-2182, April.
    12. Fasano, Francesco & Cappa, Francesco, 2022. "How do banking fintech services affect SME debt?," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    13. Baomin Chen & Xinyun Yang & Zhenzhong Ma, 2022. "Fintech and Financial Risks of Systemically Important Commercial Banks in China: An Inverted U-Shaped Relationship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Bacha, Radia & Gasmi, Farid, 2022. "The broadband diffusion process and its determinants in Algeria: A simultaneous estimation," TSE Working Papers 22-1309, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    15. Ao, Zhiming & Ji, Xinru, 2025. "Strategic cooperation in fintech field and efficiency of commercial banks," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    16. Osoro, Jared & Cheruiyot, Kiplangat Josea, 2023. "Fintech and bank stability in a small-open economy context: The case of Kenya," KBA Centre for Research on Financial Markets and Policy Working Paper Series 69, Kenya Bankers Association (KBA).
    17. Pandey, Dharen Kumar, 2025. "FinTech literature reviews: A hybrid approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    18. Yuying Gao & Shanyue Jin, 2022. "Corporate Nature, Financial Technology, and Corporate Innovation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    19. Michael Becker & Kevin Merz & Rüdiger Buchkremer, 2020. "RegTech—the application of modern information technology in regulatory affairs: areas of interest in research and practice," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 161-167, October.
    20. Zhou, Xi & Chen, Shou, 2021. "FinTech innovation regulation based on reputation theory with the participation of new media," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:4:y:2025:i:2:p:26-:d:1679603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.