IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jfinte/v4y2025i2p26-d1679603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Regulatory Sandboxes in FinTech Innovation: A Comparative Case Study of the UK, Singapore, and Hungary

Author

Listed:
  • János Kálmán

    (Ferenc Deák Faculty of Law and Political Science, István Széchenyi University, H-9026 Győr, Hungary)

Abstract

Regulatory sandboxes have emerged as policy instruments designed to support FinTech innovation while maintaining supervisory oversight. By allowing firms to test financial products in controlled environments, sandboxes aim to reduce regulatory uncertainty and facilitate market entry. Despite their growing adoption, empirical evidence of their effectiveness remains limited, particularly in emerging markets. This study explores the impact of regulatory sandboxes on innovation and market access through a qualitative comparative case study of the United Kingdom, Singapore, and Hungary. Drawing on document analysis and thematic coding, the research evaluates sandbox design, regulatory support, and innovation outcomes across the three jurisdictions. Findings show that sandboxes enhance access to funding, accelerate product development, and foster regulator–firm collaboration. While the UK and Singapore benefit from mature ecosystems and structured frameworks, Hungary illustrates sandbox potential in developing markets. The paper contributes to FinTech regulation literature and provides policy recommendations for optimizing sandbox design across varied institutional contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • János Kálmán, 2025. "The Role of Regulatory Sandboxes in FinTech Innovation: A Comparative Case Study of the UK, Singapore, and Hungary," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:4:y:2025:i:2:p:26-:d:1679603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/4/2/26/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/4/2/26/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng, Yulu & Wu, Xiaoli, 2024. "Fostering fintech innovation: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis of regulatory sandbox experiments," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 1302-1320.
    2. Wendy McCallum & Meshach J. Aziakpono, 2023. "Regulatory sandbox for FinTech regulation: Do the conditions for effective adoption exist in South Africa?," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 1100-1116, September.
    3. Christopher Chen, 2020. "Rethinking the Regulatory Sandbox for Financial Innovation: An Assessment of the UK and Singapore," Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation, in: Mark Fenwick & Steven Van Uytsel & Bi Ying (ed.), Regulating FinTech in Asia, pages 11-30, Springer.
    4. Giulio Cornelli & Sebastian Doerr & Leonardo Gambacorta & Ouarda Merrouche, 2024. "Regulatory Sandboxes and Fintech Funding: Evidence from the UK," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 28(1), pages 203-233.
    5. Drago, Carlo & Minnetti, Francesco & Di Nallo, Loris & Manzari, Alberto, 2025. "Uncovering patterns of fintech behavior in Italian banks: A multidimensional statistical analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    6. Anagnostopoulos, Ioannis, 2018. "Fintech and regtech: Impact on regulators and banks," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 7-25.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:socarx:nftv3_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Stanley Chege & Gregory Wanyembi & Constantine Nyamboga, 2023. "Enterprise Risk Management Practices in Kenya," Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 8(1), pages 15-26, April.
    3. P. K. Priyan & Wakara Ibrahimu Nyabakora & Geofrey Rwezimula, 2023. "A bibliometric review of the knowledge base on financial inclusion," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Roger Clarke, 2022. "Research opportunities in the regulatory aspects of electronic markets," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 179-200, March.
    5. Ariful Islam & Adil Mansoor & Mostafizur Rahman & Sazali Abd Wahab, 2020. "Adjusting A Strategic Cash-Flow Model For Bangladeshi Small And Medium Enterprises: The Art Of Surviving Covid-19 Emergency," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(5), pages 194-213, October.
    6. Dubey Vivek & Sonar Rakesh & Rohit S. Walimbe & Anindya Mohanty, 2020. "The Role of CLOUD in FinTech and RegTech," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 5-13.
    7. Tianlei Pi & Haoxuan Hu & Jingyi Lu & Xue Chen, 2022. "The Analysis of Fintech Risks in China: Based on Fuzzy Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Dany EKA SAPUTRA & Nicoleta ISAC & Waqar BADSHAH & Cosmin DOBRIN, 2023. "Analysis of Potential Threats of NFTS (Non-Fungible Tokens) for National Security and Economic Resilience. A Case Study of Indonesia," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(5), pages 696-716, December.
    9. Vinicius Minatogawa & Matheus Franco & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Maria Holgado & Diego Garrido & Hernan Pinto & Ruy Quadros, 2022. "Towards Systematic Sustainable Business Model Innovation: What Can We Learn from Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-35, March.
    10. Wang, Di & He, Bin & Hu, Zhimu, 2024. "Financial technology and firm productivity: Evidence from Chinese listed enterprises," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    11. Bu, Ya & Du, Xin & Li, Hui & Yu, Xinghui & Wang, Yuting, 2023. "Research on the FinTech risk early warning based on the MS-VAR model: An empirical analysis in China," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    12. Pacelli, Vincenzo & Miglietta, Federica & Foglia, Matteo, 2022. "The extreme risk connectedness of the new financial system: European evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Liu, Fangying & Su, Chi Wei & Tao, Ran & Qin, Meng & Umar, Muhammad, 2024. "Fintech and aluminium: Strategic enablers of climate change mitigation and sustainable mineral policy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Johan Solms, 2021. "Integrating Regulatory Technology (RegTech) into the digital transformation of a bank Treasury," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 191-207, September.
    15. Secinaro, Silvana & Lanzalonga, Federico & Oppioli, Michele & de Nuccio, Elbano, 2025. "The effects of disruptive technologies on accountability in fintech industry: Using bibliometric analysis to develop a research agenda," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    16. E.V. Popov & Zh. Omonov & D.B. Schulgin, 2020. "Institutional Factors in the Development of Financial Technologies in Russia," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 19(4), pages 585-604.
    17. Haitham Mohamed Elsaid, 2021. "A review of literature directions regarding the impact of fintech firms on the banking industry," Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(5), pages 693-711, October.
    18. Ahmet F. Aysan & Zhamal Nanaeva, 2022. "Fintech as a Financial Disruptor: A Bibliometric Analysis," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 1(4), pages 1-22, December.
    19. Tadiwanashe Muganyi & Linnan Yan & Yingkai Yin & Huaping Sun & Xiangbin Gong & Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2022. "Fintech, regtech, and financial development: evidence from China," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Leogrande, Angelo & Drago, Carlo & Mallardi, Giulio & Costantiello, Alberto & Magaletti, Nicola, 2024. "Patenting Propensity in Italy: A Machine Learning Approach to Regional Clustering," MPRA Paper 123081, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Johan Solms, 2021. "Integrating Regulatory Technology (RegTech) into the digital transformation of a bank Treasury," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 152-168, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:4:y:2025:i:2:p:26-:d:1679603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.