IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v8y2015i4p3058-3074d48399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

News Media Analysis of Carbon Capture and Storage and Biomass: Perceptions and Possibilities

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea M. Feldpausch-Parker

    (Department of Environmental Studies, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Morey Burnham

    (Department of Environmental Studies, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Maryna Melnik

    (Department of Environmental Studies, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA)

  • Meaghan L. Callaghan

    (Department of Environmental Studies, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA)

  • Theresa Selfa

    (Department of Environmental Studies, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA)

Abstract

In the US, carbon capture and storage (CCS) has received most of its attention when coupled with the fossil fuel industry as a mitigation strategy for climate change. CCS, which is constituted as a broad suite of capture and sequestration technologies and techniques, does not preclude coupling with other energy industries such as bioenergy (bioenergy and CCS or BECCS). In this paper, we examined news media coverage of CCS and biomass individually in locations throughout the US where these technologies are being explored to determine how they are perceived and what possibilities lay in their coupling for climate change mitigation. From our analyses, we found that individually, both CCS and biomass are perceived generally as beneficial for energy development by the news media, though they are not often mentioned in combination. Combined references do, however, speak to their value for climate change mitigation and as an alternative to fossil fuels.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea M. Feldpausch-Parker & Morey Burnham & Maryna Melnik & Meaghan L. Callaghan & Theresa Selfa, 2015. "News Media Analysis of Carbon Capture and Storage and Biomass: Perceptions and Possibilities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:4:p:3058-3074:d:48399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/4/3058/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/4/3058/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sengers, F. & Raven, R.P.J.M. & Van Venrooij, A., 2010. "From riches to rags: Biofuels, media discourses, and resistance to sustainable energy technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 5013-5027, September.
    2. Sai Gollakota & Scott McDonald, 2012. "CO 2 capture from ethanol production and storage into the Mt Simon Sandstone," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 2(5), pages 346-351, October.
    3. Darrick Evensen & Christopher Clarke & Richard Stedman, 2014. "A New York or Pennsylvania state of mind: social representations in newspaper coverage of gas development in the Marcellus Shale," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 4(1), pages 65-77, March.
    4. Carmen Bain & Theresa Selfa, 2013. "Framing and reframing the environmental risks and economic benefits of ethanol production in Iowa," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 30(3), pages 351-364, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Federica Cucchiella & Idiano D’Adamo & Paolo Rosa, 2015. "Industrial Photovoltaic Systems: An Economic Analysis in Non-Subsidized Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Kimberly S. Wolske & Kaitlin T. Raimi & Victoria Campbell-Arvai & P. Sol Hart, 2019. "Public support for carbon dioxide removal strategies: the role of tampering with nature perceptions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 345-361, March.
    3. Emma ter Mors & Esther van Leeuwen & Christine Boomsma & Renate Meier, 2023. "Media Coverage of Carbon Capture and Storage: An Analysis of Established and Emerging Themes in Dutch National Newspapers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Yurii Vasilev & Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Anna Tsvetkova & Nadejda Komendantova, 2021. "Promoting Public Awareness of Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies in the Russian Federation: A System of Educational Activities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Shapiro, Matthew A. & Bolsen, Toby, 2019. "Korean perceptions of transboundary air pollution and domestic coal development: Two framing experiments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 333-342.
    6. Hong-Hua Qiu & Lu-Ge Liu, 2018. "A Study on the Evolution of Carbon Capture and Storage Technology Based on Knowledge Mapping," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Danny Otto & Maria Pfeiffer & Mariana Madruga de Brito & Matthias Gross, 2022. "Fixed Amidst Change: 20 Years of Media Coverage on Carbon Capture and Storage in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Kamila Słupińska & Marek Wieruszewski & Piotr Szczypa & Anna Kożuch & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2022. "Public Perception of the Use of Woody Biomass for Energy Purposes in the Evaluation of Content and Information Management on the Internet," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-11, September.
    9. Laurie Waller & Tim Rayner & Jason Chilvers & Clair Amanda Gough & Irene Lorenzoni & Andrew Jordan & Naomi Vaughan, 2020. "Contested framings of greenhouse gas removal and its feasibility: Social and political dimensions," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), July.
    10. Sun, Chuanwang & Wu, Boyu, 2024. "Closer economic distance makes positive carbon-related attitude: Evidence from the mechanism of sentiment tendency in worldwide news coverage of India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    11. Ali, Ghaffar & Bashir, Muhammad Khalid & Ali, Hassan & Bashir, Muhammad Hamid, 2016. "Utilization of rice husk and poultry wastes for renewable energy potential in Pakistan: An economic perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 25-29.
    12. Haro, Pedro & Aracil, Cristina & Vidal-Barrero, Fernando & Ollero, Pedro, 2015. "Rewarding of extra-avoided GHG emissions in thermochemical biorefineries incorporating Bio-CCS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 255-266.
    13. Mysha K. Clarke & Lara A. Roman & Tenley M. Conway, 2020. "Communicating with the Public about Emerald Ash Borer: Militaristic and Fatalistic Framings in the News Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, June.
    14. Jiang, Kai & Ashworth, Peta & Zhang, Shiyi & Hu, Guoping, 2022. "Print media representations of carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) technology in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clarke, Christopher E. & Evensen, Darrick T.N., 2023. "Attention to news media coverage of unconventional oil/gas development impacts: Exploring psychological antecedents and effects on issue support," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. repec:osf:socarx:njahp_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Batel, Susana, 2020. "Re-presenting the rural in the UK press: An exploration of the construction, contestation and negotiation of media discourses on the rural within post-carbon energy transitions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. Lagendijk, Arnoud & Kooij, Henk-Jan & Veenman, Sietske & Oteman, Marieke, 2021. "Noisy monsters or beacons of transition: The framing and social (un)acceptance of Dutch community renewable energy initiatives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. Baines, Joseph, 2014. "The Ethanol Boom and the Restructuring of the Food Regime," Working Papers on Capital as Power 2014/03, Capital As Power - Toward a New Cosmology of Capitalism.
    6. Clarke, Christopher E. & Hart, Philip S. & Schuldt, Jonathon P. & Evensen, Darrick T.N. & Boudet, Hilary S. & Jacquet, Jeffrey B. & Stedman, Richard C., 2015. "Public opinion on energy development: The interplay of issue framing, top-of-mind associations, and political ideology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 131-140.
    7. Lempinen, Hanna, 2019. "“Barely surviving on a pile of gold”: Arguing for the case of peat energy in 2010s Finland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-7.
    8. Adrian Marjolein Caniels & Henny Romijn, 2009. "The Jatropha Biofuels Sector in Tanzania 2005-9: Evolution Towards Sustainability?," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 0919, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Nov 2009.
    9. Astrid Buchmayr & Luc Van Ootegem & Jo Dewulf & Elsy Verhofstadt, 2021. "Understanding Attitudes towards Renewable Energy Technologies and the Effect of Local Experiences," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    10. Weiss, Günther, 2017. "Medial construction of energy landscapes in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 845-853.
    11. Andersson-Hudson, Jessica & Knight, William & Humphrey, Mathew & O’Hara, Sarah, 2016. "Exploring support for shale gas extraction in the United Kingdom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 582-589.
    12. Douglas H. Constance, 2023. "The doctors of agrifood studies," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(1), pages 31-43, March.
    13. Sara Fabbrizzi & Filomena Maggino & Nicola Marinelli & Silvio Menghini & Cecilia Ricci & Sandro Sacchelli, 2017. "Sustainability: A quantitative discourse analysis," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 11-25.
    14. Pour, Nasim & Webley, Paul A. & Cook, Peter J., 2018. "Opportunities for application of BECCS in the Australian power sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 615-635.
    15. Andreas Goldthau & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2016. "Energy Technology, Politics, and Interpretative Frames: Shale Gas Fracking in Eastern Europe," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 16(4), pages 50-69, November.
    16. Fang, Xingming & Qu, Zitang & Sun, Chuanwang & Wu, Chengkuan & Wei, Jing, 2022. "Public attitude and policy selection of future energy sustainability in China: Evidence of the survey of the college students," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    17. Jurandir Zullo & Vânia Rosa Pereira & Andrea Koga-Vicente, 2018. "Sugar-energy sector vulnerability under CMIP5 projections in the Brazilian central-southern macro-region," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 489-502, August.
    18. Sanchez, Daniel L. & Callaway, Duncan S., 2016. "Optimal scale of carbon-negative energy facilities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 437-444.
    19. Neil A. Thompson & Andrea M. Herrmann & Marko P. Hekkert, 2018. "SME Knowledge Commercialization Through Public Sector Partnerships," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1-27, June.
    20. Cuppen, Eefje & Pesch, Udo & Remmerswaal, Sanne & Taanman, Mattijs, 2019. "Normative diversity, conflict and transition: Shale gas in the Netherlands," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 165-175.
    21. Shapiro, Matthew A. & Bolsen, Toby, 2019. "Korean perceptions of transboundary air pollution and domestic coal development: Two framing experiments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 333-342.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:4:p:3058-3074:d:48399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.