IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i9p2382-d1650445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing Large-Scale CCS in Complex Geologic Reservoirs: Insights from Three Appalachian Basin Case Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Joel Sminchak

    (Battelle Memorial Research Institute, Columbus, OH 43201, USA)

  • Priya Ravi-Ganesh

    (Battelle Memorial Research Institute, Columbus, OH 43201, USA)

  • Randall Hunt

    (Battelle Memorial Research Institute, Columbus, OH 43201, USA)

  • John Hershberger

    (Battelle Memorial Research Institute, Columbus, OH 43201, USA)

  • Brigitte Petras

    (Battelle Memorial Research Institute, Columbus, OH 43201, USA)

Abstract

This paper presents three design case studies for implementing large-scale geologic carbon storage in the Appalachian Basin region of the midwestern United States. While the Appalachian Basin has a challenging setting for carbon storage, the three case studies detailed in this article demonstrate that there are realistic options for implementing carbon storage in the basin. Carbonate rock formations, depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs, and moderate-porosity sandstones can be utilized as carbon-storage reservoirs in the Appalachian Basin. While these are not typical concepts for CO 2 storage, the storage zones have advantages such as defined trapping mechanisms, multiple caprocks, and defined boundaries that are not always present in thick, permeable sandstones being targeted for many carbon-storage projects. The geologic setting, geotechnical parameters, and hydrologic setting for the three case studies are provided, along with the results of reservoir simulations of the CO 2 injection-deployment strategies. The geological rock formations available for CO 2 storage in the Appalachian Basin are more localized reservoirs with defined boundaries and finite storage capacities. Simulation results showed that accessing carbon-storage resources in these fields may require wellfields with 2–10 injection wells. However, these fields would have the capacity to inject 1–3 million metric tons of CO 2 per year and up to 90 million metric tons of CO 2 in total. The CO 2 storage resources would fulfill decarbonization goals for many of the natural-gas power plants, cement plants, hydrogen plants, and refineries in the Appalachian Basin region.

Suggested Citation

  • Joel Sminchak & Priya Ravi-Ganesh & Randall Hunt & John Hershberger & Brigitte Petras, 2025. "Implementing Large-Scale CCS in Complex Geologic Reservoirs: Insights from Three Appalachian Basin Case Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2382-:d:1650445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2382/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2382/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raziperchikolaee, S. & Alvarado, V. & Yin, S., 2013. "Effect of hydraulic fracturing on long-term storage of CO2 in stimulated saline aquifers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1091-1104.
    2. Haroon Kheshgi & Heleen Coninck & John Kessels, 2012. "Carbon dioxide capture and storage: Seven years after the IPCC special report," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 563-567, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samin Raziperchikolaee & Ashwin Pasumarti & Srikanta Mishra, 2020. "The effect of natural fractures on CO2 storage performance and oil recovery from CO2 and WAG injection in an Appalachian basin reservoir," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(5), pages 1098-1114, October.
    2. Rashid Mohamed Mkemai & Gong Bin, 2020. "A modeling and numerical simulation study of enhanced CO2 sequestration into deep saline formation: a strategy towards climate change mitigation," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 901-927, May.
    3. Shinichiro Asayama, 2024. "The history and future of IPCC special reports: A dual role of politicisation and normalisation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(9), pages 1-27, September.
    4. Yaqub, Z.T. & Oboirien, B.O. & Leion, H., 2024. "Process optimization of chemical looping combustion of solid waste/biomass using machine learning algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    5. Niko Jaakkola, 2012. "Monopolistic sequestration of European carbon emissions," OxCarre Working Papers 098, Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource Rich Economies, University of Oxford.
    6. He, Xinwei & He, Hang & Barzagli, Francesco & Amer, Mohammad Waleed & Li, Chao'en & Zhang, Rui, 2023. "Analysis of the energy consumption in solvent regeneration processes using binary amine blends for CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    7. Surawut Chomaitong & Ranjith Perera, 2014. "Adoption of the low carbon society policy in locally-governed urban areas: experience from Thai municipalities," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(8), pages 1255-1275, December.
    8. Liu, Zhaoyi & Pan, Zhejun & Li, Shibin & Zhang, Ligang & Wang, Fengshan & Han, Lingling & Zhang, Jun & Ma, Yuanyuan & Li, Hao & Li, Wei, 2022. "Study on the effect of cemented natural fractures on hydraulic fracture propagation in volcanic reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    9. Rashid Mohamed Mkemai & Gong Bin, 0. "A modeling and numerical simulation study of enhanced CO2 sequestration into deep saline formation: a strategy towards climate change mitigation," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 901-927.
    10. Sun, Huiru & Chen, Jing & Ji, Xiang & Karunakaran, Gajanan & Chen, Bingbing & Ranjith, Pathegama Gamage & Song, Yongchen & Yang, Mingjun, 2024. "Optimizing CO2 hydrate storage: Dynamics and stability of hydrate caps in submarine sediments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 376(PB).
    11. Samin Raziperchikolaee & Vivek Singh & Mark Kelley, 2020. "The effect of Biot coefficient and elastic moduli stress–pore pressure dependency on poroelastic response to fluid injection: laboratory experiments and geomechanical modeling," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(5), pages 980-998, October.
    12. Middleton, Richard S. & Carey, J. William & Currier, Robert P. & Hyman, Jeffrey D. & Kang, Qinjun & Karra, Satish & Jiménez-Martínez, Joaquín & Porter, Mark L. & Viswanathan, Hari S., 2015. "Shale gas and non-aqueous fracturing fluids: Opportunities and challenges for supercritical CO2," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 500-509.
    13. Zhang, Lisong & Zhang, Shiyan & Jiang, Weizhai & Wang, Zhiyuan & Li, Jing & Bian, Yinghui, 2018. "A mechanism of fluid exchange associated to CO2 leakage along activated fault during geologic storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1178-1190.
    14. Leung, Dennis Y.C. & Caramanna, Giorgio & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes, 2014. "An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 426-443.
    15. Kant, Michael A. & Rossi, Edoardo & Duss, Jonas & Amann, Florian & Saar, Martin O. & Rudolf von Rohr, Philipp, 2018. "Demonstration of thermal borehole enlargement to facilitate controlled reservoir engineering for deep geothermal, oil or gas systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1501-1509.
    16. Sharmina, Maria, 2017. "Low-carbon scenarios for Russia's energy system: A participative backcasting approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 303-315.
    17. John Michael Humphries Choptiany & Ron Pelot & Kate Sherren, 2014. "An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Carbon Capture and Storage Assessment Methods," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 18(3), pages 445-458, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2382-:d:1650445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.