IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i8p2125-d1638788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utility Theory Application in Decision-Making Behavior for Energy Use and Management: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Huiying (Cynthia) Hou

    (Department of Building Environment and Energy Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

This paper investigates the application of utility theory in decision-making related to energy use behavior and management practice in the energy sector. By conducting a systematic literature review, this study aims to understand the theoretical and practical applications of utility theory in optimizing energy consumption and management strategies. The review targets a comprehensive collection of academic works that apply utility theory to various aspects of energy use behavior and management decisions, including efficiency initiatives, renewable energy adoption, and sustainable infrastructure development. A systematic literature review methodology was adopted, which encompassed a rigorous selection process to identify relevant studies, followed by a detailed analysis of how utility theory has been employed to influence energy-related decisions in residential, commercial, and industrial settings. The review findings were synthesized to outline the implications for both policy and practice, highlighting the role of utility theory in guiding more efficient and sustainable energy management practices. Through this exploration, the paper provides a discussion on bridging the gap between economic theoretical models and practical energy management applications. It also offers insights into how decision-making influenced by utility theory can lead to enhanced energy efficiency and sustainability. The findings offer valuable guidance for policymakers and energy managers in designing and implementing energy systems and policies that maximize utility while considering environmental and economic impacts. This paper serves to advance the theoretical framework of utility theory and its practical application in energy management, facilitating better-informed strategies that align with global sustainability goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Huiying (Cynthia) Hou, 2025. "Utility Theory Application in Decision-Making Behavior for Energy Use and Management: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:8:p:2125-:d:1638788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/8/2125/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/8/2125/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenneth Gillingham & Karen Palmer, 2014. "Bridging the Energy Efficiency Gap: Policy Insights from Economic Theory and Empirical Evidence," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 8(1), pages 18-38, January.
    2. Ahlrichs, Jakob & Rockstuhl, Sebastian, 2022. "Estimating fair rent increases after building retrofits: A max-min fairness approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    3. De-León Almaraz, Sofía & Moustapha Mai, Tchougoune & Melendez, Iris Rocio & Loganathan, M.K. & Azzaro-Pantel, Catherine, 2024. "A holistic approach to assessing reliability in green hydrogen supply chains using mixed methods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    4. Zha, Donglan & Yang, Guanglei & Wang, Wenzhong & Wang, Qunwei & Zhou, Dequn, 2020. "Appliance energy labels and consumer heterogeneity: A latent class approach based on a discrete choice experiment in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Motahareh Sagharidooz & Hamzeh Soltanali & José Torres Farinha & Hugo D. N. Raposo & José Edmundo de-Almeida-e-Pais, 2024. "Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability Assessment-Based Sustainability-Informed Maintenance Optimization in Power Transmission Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Mihailova, Darja & Schubert, Iljana & Martinez-Cruz, Adan L. & Hearn, Adam X. & Sohre, Annika, 2022. "Preferences for configurations of Positive Energy Districts – Insights from a discrete choice experiment on Swiss households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    7. Motz, Alessandra, 2021. "Consumer acceptance of the energy transition in Switzerland: The role of attitudes explained through a hybrid discrete choice model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Rockstuhl, Sebastian & Wenninger, Simon & Wiethe, Christian & Häckel, Björn, 2021. "Understanding the risk perception of energy efficiency investments: Investment perspective vs. energy bill perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    9. Höfer, Tim & Madlener, Reinhard, 2020. "A participatory stakeholder process for evaluating sustainable energy transition scenarios," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Shutong & Blasch, Julia & van Beukering, Pieter & Wang, Junfeng, 2022. "Energy labels and heuristic decision-making: The role of cognition and energy literacy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Huanyu, 2024. "Present-biased individuals and their underinvestment in household energy efficiency: Evidence from first-tier Chinese cities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Britto, Anthony & Dehler-Holland, Joris & Fichtner, Wolf, 2024. "Wealth maximisation and residential energy-efficiency retrofits: Insights from a real options model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Britto, Anthony & Dehler-Holland, Joris & Fichtner, Wolf, 2022. "Wealth, consumption, and energy-efficiency investments," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 67, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    5. Feser, Daniel & Runst, Petrik, 2015. "Energy efficiency consultants as change agents? Examining the reasons for EECs’ limited success," ifh Working Papers 1 (2015), Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh).
    6. Todd D. Gerarden & Richard G. Newell & Robert N. Stavins, 2017. "Assessing the Energy-Efficiency Gap," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1486-1525, December.
    7. Schleich, Joachim & Faure, Corinne & Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte & Tu, Gengyang, 2020. "Conveyance, envy, and homeowner choice of appliances," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. Katris, Antonios & Turner, Karen, 2021. "Can different approaches to funding household energy efficiency deliver on economic and social policy objectives? ECO and alternatives in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    9. Fischbacher, Urs & Schudy, Simeon & Teyssier, Sabrina, 2021. "Heterogeneous preferences and investments in energy saving measures," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    10. Florian Knobloch & Hector Pollitt & Unnada Chewpreecha & Vassilis Daioglou & Jean-Francois Mercure, 2017. "Simulating the deep decarbonisation of residential heating for limiting global warming to 1.5C," Papers 1710.11019, arXiv.org, revised May 2018.
    11. Olsthoorn, Mark & Schleich, Joachim & Hirzel, Simon, 2017. "Adoption of Energy Efficiency Measures for Non-residential Buildings: Technological and Organizational Heterogeneity in the Trade, Commerce and Services Sector," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 240-254.
    12. Manisha Jain, Anand B. Rao, and Anand Patwardhan, 2021. "Energy Cost Information and Consumer Decisions: Results from a Choice Experiment on Refrigerator Purchases in India," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2), pages 253-272.
    13. Ben Gilbert & Jacob LaRiviere & Kevin Novan, 2019. "Additionality, Mistakes, and Energy Efficiency Investment," Working Papers 2019-01, Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business.
    14. Michael Peneder & Spyros Arvanitis & Christian Rammer & Tobias Stucki & Martin Wörter, 2022. "Policy instruments and self-reported impacts of the adoption of energy saving technologies in the DACH region," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 49(2), pages 369-404, May.
    15. Faure, Corinne & Schleich, Joachim, 2020. "Poor energy ratings when appliances convey?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    16. Rockstuhl, Sebastian & Wenninger, Simon & Wiethe, Christian & Ahlrichs, Jakob, 2022. "The influence of risk perception on energy efficiency investments: Evidence from a German survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    17. Yael Nidam & Ali Irani & Jamie Bemis & Christoph Reinhart, 2023. "Census-based urban building energy modeling to evaluate the effectiveness of retrofit programs," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(9), pages 2394-2406, November.
    18. Sophie M. Behr & Merve Kucuk & Maximilian Longmuir & Karsten Neuhoff, 2025. "Prioritize to Decarbonize: Thermal Retrofits, Carbon Prices, and Energy Inequality," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2119, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    19. Lei, Mingyu & Cai, Wenjia & Liu, Wenling & Wang, Can, 2022. "The heterogeneity in energy consumption patterns and home appliance purchasing preferences across urban households in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    20. Feser, Daniel & Runst, Petrik, 2016. "Energy efficiency consultants as change agents? Examining the reasons for EECs’ limited success," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 309-317.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:8:p:2125-:d:1638788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.