IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i17p4682-d1741353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Federated Learning for Decentralized Electricity Market Optimization: A Review and Research Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Tymoteusz Miller

    (Institute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland
    Polish Society of Bioinformatics and Data Science BioData, 71-214 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Irmina Durlik

    (Faculty of Navigation, Maritime University of Szczecin, Waly Chrobrego 1-2, 70-500 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Ewelina Kostecka

    (Faculty of Mechatronics and Electrical Engineering, Maritime University of Szczecin, Waly Chrobrego 1-2, 70-500 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Polina Kozlovska

    (Faculty of Economics, Finance and Management, University of Szczecin, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Aleksander Nowak

    (Faculty of Mechatronics and Electrical Engineering, Maritime University of Szczecin, Waly Chrobrego 1-2, 70-500 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

Decentralized electricity markets are increasingly shaped by the proliferation of distributed energy resources, the rise of prosumers, and growing demands for privacy-aware analytics. In this context, federated learning (FL) emerges as a promising paradigm that enables collaborative model training without centralized data aggregation. This review systematically explores the application of FL in energy systems, with particular attention to architectures, heterogeneity management, optimization tasks, and real-world use cases such as load forecasting, market bidding, congestion control, and predictive maintenance. The article critically examines evaluation practices, reproducibility issues, regulatory ambiguities, ethical implications, and interoperability barriers. It highlights the limitations of current benchmarking approaches and calls for domain-specific FL simulation environments. By mapping the intersection of technical design, market dynamics, and institutional constraints, the article formulates a pluralistic research agenda for scalable, fair, and secure FL deployments in modern electricity systems. This work positions FL not merely as a technical innovation but as a socio-technical intervention, requiring co-design across engineering, policy, and human factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Tymoteusz Miller & Irmina Durlik & Ewelina Kostecka & Polina Kozlovska & Aleksander Nowak, 2025. "Federated Learning for Decentralized Electricity Market Optimization: A Review and Research Agenda," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-27, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4682-:d:1741353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/17/4682/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/17/4682/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haokun Fang & Quan Qian, 2021. "Privacy Preserving Machine Learning with Homomorphic Encryption and Federated Learning," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Kirsten Martin, 2019. "Ethical Implications and Accountability of Algorithms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 835-850, December.
    3. Harshit Gupta & Piyush Agarwal & Kartik Gupta & Suhana Baliarsingh & O. P. Vyas & Antonio Puliafito, 2023. "FedGrid: A Secure Framework with Federated Learning for Energy Optimization in the Smart Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Zhengyi Zhu & Bingyin Xu & Christoph Brunner & Tony Yip & Yu Chen, 2017. "IEC 61850 Configuration Solution to Distributed Intelligence in Distribution Grid Automation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Michael Meiser & Ingo Zinnikus, 2024. "A Survey on the Use of Synthetic Data for Enhancing Key Aspects of Trustworthy AI in the Energy Domain: Challenges and Opportunities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-29, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niyi Ogunbiyi & Artie Basukoski & Thierry Chaussalet, 2021. "An Exploration of Ethical Decision Making with Intelligence Augmentation," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Miro Antonijević & Stjepan Sučić & Hrvoje Keserica, 2018. "Augmented Reality Applications for Substation Management by Utilizing Standards-Compliant SCADA Communication," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Patricia A. Norberg & Daniel R. Horne, 2024. "When the bridge is not human: Algorithmic interference in forming social relationships through the manipulation of weak ties," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 606-629, June.
    4. Stephanie Kelley, 2022. "Employee Perceptions of the Effective Adoption of AI Principles," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 871-893, July.
    5. Maude Lavanchy & Patrick Reichert & Jayanth Narayanan & Krishna Savani, 2023. "Applicants’ Fairness Perceptions of Algorithm-Driven Hiring Procedures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 125-150, November.
    6. Mathieu Chevrier & Vincent Teixeira, 2024. "Algorithm Delegation and Responsibility: Shifting Blame to the Programmer?," GREDEG Working Papers 2024-04, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France, revised Sep 2024.
    7. Lorin Jenkel & Stefan Jonas & Angela Meyer, 2023. "Privacy-Preserving Fleet-Wide Learning of Wind Turbine Conditions with Federated Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-29, September.
    8. Adesuwa Omorede & Juan Francisco Prados-Castillo & Amalia Cristina Casas-Jurado, 2025. "Researching entrepreneurship using big data: implementation, benefits, and challenges," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Dirk Ulrich Gilbert & Stephanie Schrage & Michael Behnam, 2024. "Advancing the Moral legitimacy of digital platforms as gatekeepers: a critical analysis from a political corporate social responsibility perspective," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 94(7), pages 1115-1145, October.
    10. Etye Steinberg, 2022. "Run for Your Life: The Ethics of Behavioral Tracking in Insurance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 665-682, September.
    11. Bonsón, Enrique & Lavorato, Domenica & Lamboglia, Rita & Mancini, Daniela, 2021. "Artificial intelligence activities and ethical approaches in leading listed companies in the European Union," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    12. Héctor León & Carlos Montez & Odilson Valle & Francisco Vasques, 2019. "Real-Time Analysis of Time-Critical Messages in IEC 61850 Electrical Substation Communication Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    13. Claudy, Marius C. & Parkinson, Mary & Aquino, Karl, 2024. "Why should innovators care about morality? Political ideology, moral foundations, and the acceptance of technological innovations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    14. David Horneber & Sven Laumer, 2023. "Algorithmic Accountability," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(6), pages 723-730, December.
    15. Craig Reeves & Matthew Sinnicks, 2024. "Totally Administered Heteronomy: Adorno on Work, Leisure, and Politics in the Age of Digital Capitalism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(2), pages 285-301, August.
    16. Xing Zhang & Yuexiang Luo & Tianning Li, 2025. "A Review of Research on Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-39, July.
    17. Peng Tian & Zetao Li & Zhenghang Hao, 2019. "A Doubly-Fed Induction Generator Adaptive Control Strategy and Coordination Technology Compatible with Feeder Automation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-21, November.
    18. Chenfeng Yan & Quan Chen & Xinyue Zhou & Xin Dai & Zhilin Yang, 2024. "When the Automated fire Backfires: The Adoption of Algorithm-based HR Decision-making Could Induce Consumer’s Unfavorable Ethicality Inferences of the Company," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(4), pages 841-859, April.
    19. Lu Han & Xiaohong Huang & Dandan Li & Yong Zhang, 2023. "RingFFL: A Ring-Architecture-Based Fair Federated Learning Framework," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Lingyan Sun & Yu Chen & Qinjun Du & Rui Ding & Zhidong Liu & Qian Cheng, 2023. "Topology Identification of Low-Voltage Power Lines Based on IEC 61850 and the Clustering Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4682-:d:1741353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.