IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i10p2478-d1653807.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Carbon Footprint of a Textile Company for the Automotive Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Beatriz Silva

    (Department of Production and Systems, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • David Malheiro

    (Department of Production and Systems, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Dinis Júnior

    (Department of Production and Systems, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Francisca Nunes

    (Department of Production and Systems, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Joana Santos

    (Department of Production and Systems, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Liliana Guimarães

    (Department of Production and Systems, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Maria Socorro

    (Department of Production and Systems, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Mariana Carvalho

    (Department of Production and Systems, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Mariana Silva

    (Department of Production and Systems, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Rui M. Lima

    (Department of Production and Systems, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
    Algoritmi Research Centre, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Rui M. Sousa

    (Department of Production and Systems, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
    Algoritmi Research Centre, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

Abstract

This study aims to develop a process to calculate the carbon footprint of a company in the textile sector for the automotive industry, thus addressing a research gap identified in this sector. Based on a structured calculation model, the project aspires to innovate by quantifying not only the greenhouse gas emissions at different stages of the company’s operations, including those generated by the consumed electricity and gas, but also the emissions related to external and in-house transportation and solid waste management. The approach includes the design of a specific calculator, capable of integrating variables such as energy consumption, transport and types of waste, analysing them in the light of recognised conversion factors. This tool not only allows for a detailed assessment of emissions but also supports strategic decision-making, guiding the implementation of more sustainable business practices. The results indicate that, considering the use of renewable energy sources, the company’s total emissions amount to approximately 18 thousand tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. On the other hand, considering non-renewable energy, purchased electricity accounts for 31 thousand megawatt-hours per year, corresponding to 5 thousand tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, with the twisting area being the largest consumer at 89% of total usage, followed by the dipping area. In terms of mobile combustion, raw materials contribute 1373 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, while finished products generate 1869 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. Among the most impactful variables, solid waste, and stationary combustion stand out as the main contributors. These findings highlight the need for concrete measures to mitigate climate change, such as transitioning from stationary natural gas combustion to green electric power; identifying companies with more suitable waste treatment solutions, process changes that reduce disposable, and easily substitutable materials; making use of green electricity; exploring alternative transport methods or combining different modes, such as using electric vehicles for short distances; and optimizing transport routes. These initiatives reinforce the company’s commitment to sustainable development goals and the promotion of responsible environmental practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Beatriz Silva & David Malheiro & Dinis Júnior & Francisca Nunes & Joana Santos & Liliana Guimarães & Maria Socorro & Mariana Carvalho & Mariana Silva & Rui M. Lima & Rui M. Sousa, 2025. "Analysis of the Carbon Footprint of a Textile Company for the Automotive Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:2478-:d:1653807
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/10/2478/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/10/2478/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ana Fonseca & Edgar Ramalho & Ana Gouveia & Rita Henriques & Filipa Figueiredo & João Nunes, 2023. "Systematic Insights into a Textile Industry: Reviewing Life Cycle Assessment and Eco-Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Rafał Baron & Daniel Kowol & Piotr Matusiak & Paweł Friebe & Marcin Lutyński, 2024. "Comparative Analysis of the Carbon Footprint Value Resulting from the Selected Mode of Transport, Based on the Example of Transporting Neodymium Magnets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Antonella Violano & Monica Cannaviello, 2023. "The Carbon Footprint of Thermal Insulation: The Added Value of Circular Models Using Recycled Textile Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Griffiths, Steve & Bazilian, Morgan & Kim, Jinsoo & Foley, Aoife M. & Rooney, David, 2022. "Decarbonizing the pulp and paper industry: A critical and systematic review of sociotechnical developments and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Hakan Alıcı & Beyza Nur Yiğit & Betül Menemencioğlu & Kübra Tümay Ateş & Özge Demirdelen & Tuğçe Demirdelen & Ziya Kıvanç, 2024. "Analysis of Carbon Footprint Including Process-Level Calculation and Its Influencing Factors of Process for Low-Carbon and Sustainable Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-24, November.
    6. Israa Al Khaffaf & Adil Tamimi & Vian Ahmed, 2024. "Pathways to Carbon Neutrality: A Review of Strategies and Technologies Across Sectors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-38, December.
    7. Jérôme Payet, 2021. "Assessment of Carbon Footprint for the Textile Sector in France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Pankaj Kumar & Krishna Kumar Sinha & Bojan Đurin & Mukesh Kumar Gupta & Nishant Saxena & Malay Kumar Banerjee & Nikola Kranjčić & Suraj Kumar Singh & Shruti Kanga, 2022. "Economics of Implementing Solar Thermal Heating Systems in the Textile Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Nugent, Daniel & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2014. "Assessing the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions from solar PV and wind energy: A critical meta-survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 229-244.
    10. Chris Goodall, 2007. "Going in the right direction," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 1(709), pages 58-59, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajanna, S. & Saini, R.P., 2016. "Modeling of integrated renewable energy system for electrification of a remote area in India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 175-187.
    2. Emblemsvåg, Jan, 2022. "Wind energy is not sustainable when balanced by fossil energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    3. Kumar, Indraneel & Tyner, Wallace E. & Sinha, Kumares C., 2016. "Input–output life cycle environmental assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from utility scale wind energy in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 294-301.
    4. Zhang, Zumeng & Ding, Liping & Wang, Chaofan & Dai, Qiyao & Shi, Yin & Zhao, Yujia & Zhu, Yuxuan, 2022. "Do operation and maintenance contracts help photovoltaic poverty alleviation power stations perform better?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    5. Liang, Yushi & Wu, Chunbing & Ji, Xiaodong & Zhang, Mulan & Li, Yiran & He, Jianjun & Qin, Zhiheng, 2022. "Estimation of the influences of spatiotemporal variations in air density on wind energy assessment in China based on deep neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    6. Dixon, Christopher & Reynolds, Steve & Rodley, David, 2016. "Micro/small wind turbine power control for electrolysis applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 182-192.
    7. Piotr Olczak & Małgorzata Olek & Dominika Matuszewska & Artur Dyczko & Tomasz Mania, 2021. "Monofacial and Bifacial Micro PV Installation as Element of Energy Transition—The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Qi, Xiaoyan & Yao, Xilong & Guo, Pibin & Han, Yunfei & Liu, Lin, 2024. "Applying life cycle assessment to investigate the environmental impacts of a PV–CSP hybrid system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    9. Lu, Qing & Yu, Hao & Zhao, Kangli & Leng, Yajun & Hou, Jianchao & Xie, Pinjie, 2019. "Residential demand response considering distributed PV consumption: A model based on China's PV policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 443-456.
    10. Bonou, Alexandra & Laurent, Alexis & Olsen, Stig I., 2016. "Life cycle assessment of onshore and offshore wind energy-from theory to application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 327-337.
    11. Elias Hurmekoski & Juulia Suuronen & Lassi Ahlvik & Janni Kunttu & Tanja Myllyviita, 2022. "Substitution impacts of wood‐based textile fibers: Influence of market assumptions," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1564-1577, August.
    12. Squalli, Jay, 2017. "Renewable energy, coal as a baseload power source, and greenhouse gas emissions: Evidence from U.S. state-level data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 479-488.
    13. Alessandro Franco & Lorenzo Miserocchi & Daniele Testi, 2023. "Energy Indicators for Enabling Energy Transition in Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Li, Yan & Zhang, Qi & Wang, Ge & McLellan, Benjamin & Liu, Xue Fei & Wang, Le, 2018. "A review of photovoltaic poverty alleviation projects in China: Current status, challenge and policy recommendations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 214-223.
    15. Shaikh, Mohammad A. & Kucukvar, Murat & Onat, Nuri Cihat & Kirkil, Gokhan, 2017. "A framework for water and carbon footprint analysis of national electricity production scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 406-421.
    16. M. A. Parvez Mahmud & Nazmul Huda & Shahjadi Hisan Farjana & Candace Lang, 2018. "Environmental Impacts of Solar-Photovoltaic and Solar-Thermal Systems with Life-Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, September.
    17. Gilbert, Alexander Q. & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2018. "Carbon pathways in the global gas market: An attributional lifecycle assessment of the climate impacts of liquefied natural gas exports from the United States to Asia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 635-643.
    18. Peidu Li & Xiaoqing Gao & Junxia Jiang & Liwei Yang & Yujie Li, 2020. "Characteristic Analysis of Water Quality Variation and Fish Impact Study of Fish-Lighting Complementary Photovoltaic Power Station," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-11, September.
    19. Tuğçe Demirdelen & İnayet Özge Aksu & Kübra Yilmaz & Duygu Durdu Koç & Miray Arikan & Arif Şener, 2023. "Investigation of the Carbon Footprint of the Textile Industry: PES- and PP-Based Products with Monte Carlo Uncertainty Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Tibebu, Tiruwork B. & Hittinger, Eric & Miao, Qing & Williams, Eric, 2021. "What is the optimal subsidy for residential solar?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:2478-:d:1653807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.