IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i23p6016-d1532998.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energetic Efficiency of a Deep Borehole Heat Exchanger Adapted from a Freezing Borehole Based on a Long-Term Thermal Response Test

Author

Listed:
  • Tomasz Sliwa

    (Laboratory of Geoenergetics, AGH University of Krakow, 30 Mickiewicza Av., 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Jakub Drosik

    (Prawtech Sp. z o. o., ul. Garbarska 43, 32-340 Wolbrom, Poland)

  • Michał Kruszewski

    (Chair of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, RWTH Aachen University, Lochnerstraße 4-20, 52056 Aachen, Germany)

  • Mohsen Assadi

    (Department of Energy and Petroleum Engineering, Universitet of Stavanger, Kjell Arholms gate 41, 4021 Stavanger, Norway)

  • Stanisław Kotyła

    (SATOR Grzegorz Skowroński, ul. Wspólna 10, 26-900 Kozienice-Nowiny, Poland)

Abstract

This paper describes the characteristics of a thermal response test and presents the results of the test conducted on a borehole at the freezing shaft in Poland. Freezing boreholes are temporary boreholes created to facilitate other geological work, especially for large-diameter mine shafts or other boreholes. Due to their nature, they are abandoned after the necessary work around the mine shaft is completed. The economical point of view suggests that, after their use as freezing boreholes, they should be used for heating if possible. In this paper, the authors aim to suggest that they can be utilized as borehole heat exchangers. Large numbers of freezing boreholes sit idle across the globe while they could be used as a renewable energy source, so creating a new way to obtain heating power in the future should be popularized. The paper includes a description of the implementation method of the thermal response test and the results of the test on a sample freezing borehole intended for abandonment. The test results were interpreted, and the key parameters of the borehole heat exchanger based on the freezing borehole were determined to be satisfactory. The possibilities of other borehole uses are also described.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomasz Sliwa & Jakub Drosik & Michał Kruszewski & Mohsen Assadi & Stanisław Kotyła, 2024. "Energetic Efficiency of a Deep Borehole Heat Exchanger Adapted from a Freezing Borehole Based on a Long-Term Thermal Response Test," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:6016-:d:1532998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/6016/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/6016/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Song, Xianzhi & Wang, Gaosheng & Shi, Yu & Li, Ruixia & Xu, Zhengming & Zheng, Rui & Wang, Yu & Li, Jiacheng, 2018. "Numerical analysis of heat extraction performance of a deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger geothermal system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1298-1310.
    2. Zhang, Yuanyuan & Ye, Cantao & Kong, Yanlong & Gong, Yulie & Zhang, Dongdong & Yao, Yecheng, 2023. "Thermal attenuation and heat supplementary analysis of medium-deep coaxial borehole system-based on a practical project," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    3. Tomasz Sliwa & Tomasz Kowalski & Dominik Cekus & Aneta Sapińska-Śliwa, 2021. "Research on Fresh and Hardened Sealing Slurries with the Addition of Magnesium Regarding Thermal Conductivity for Energy Piles and Borehole Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Peng Li & Peng Guan & Jun Zheng & Bin Dou & Hong Tian & Xinsheng Duan & Hejuan Liu, 2020. "Field Test and Numerical Simulation on Heat Transfer Performance of Coaxial Borehole Heat Exchanger," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Gultekin, Ahmet & Aydin, Murat & Sisman, Altug, 2019. "Effects of arrangement geometry and number of boreholes on thermal interaction coefficient of multi-borehole heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 163-170.
    6. Jiewen Deng & Qingpeng Wei & Shi He & Mei Liang & Hui Zhang, 2020. "Simulation Analysis on the Heat Performance of Deep Borehole Heat Exchangers in Medium-Depth Geothermal Heat Pump Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, February.
    7. Claudio Alimonti, 2023. "Technical Performance Comparison between U-Shaped and Deep Borehole Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhendi Ma & Siyu Qin & Yuping Zhang & Wei-Hsin Chen & Guosheng Jia & Chonghua Cheng & Liwen Jin, 2023. "Effects of Boundary Conditions on Performance Prediction of Deep-Buried Ground Heat Exchangers for Geothermal Energy Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-27, June.
    2. Zhang, Sheng & Liu, Jun & Zhang, Xia & Wang, Fenghao, 2024. "Properly shortening design time scale of medium-deep borehole heat exchanger for high building heating performances with high computational efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    3. Jia, G.S. & Ma, Z.D. & Xia, Z.H. & Zhang, Y.P. & Xue, Y.Z. & Chai, J.C. & Jin, L.W., 2022. "A finite-volume method for full-scale simulations of coaxial borehole heat exchangers with different structural parameters, geological and operating conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 296-313.
    4. Zheng, Jianqiao & Zhang, Yanjun & Huang, Yibin & Liu, Qiangbin & Cheng, Yuxiang & Guo, Jixiang, 2024. "Numerical investigation on heat transfer performance of the segmented cementing coaxial heat exchanger," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    5. huajun, Wang & Yishuo, Xu & Yukun, Sun & Sumin, Zhao, 2022. "Heat extraction by deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger for clean space heating near Beijing, China: Field test, model comparison and operation pattern evaluation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 803-815.
    6. Chen, Wen & Zhou, Chaohui & Huang, Xinyu & Luo, Hanbin & Luo, Yongqiang & Cheng, Nan & Tian, Zhiyong & Zhang, Shicong & Fan, Jianhua & Zhang, Ling, 2024. "Study on thermal radius and capacity of multiple deep borehole heat exchangers: Analytical solution, algorithm and application based on Response Factor Matrix method (RFM)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    7. Wang, Xiaozhe & Zhang, Hao & Cui, Lin & Wang, Jingying & Lee, Chunhian & Zhu, Xiaoxuan & Dong, Yong, 2024. "Borehole thermal energy storage for building heating application: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    8. Huang, Shuai & Li, Jiqin & Zhu, Ke & Dong, Jiankai & Jiang, Yiqiang, 2024. "Numerical investigation on the long-term heating performance and sustainability analysis of medium-deep U-type borehole heat exchanger system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    9. Luka Boban & Dino Miše & Stjepan Herceg & Vladimir Soldo, 2021. "Application and Design Aspects of Ground Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-31, April.
    10. Cassina, Lisa & Laloui, Lyesse & Rotta Loria, Alessandro F., 2022. "Thermal interactions among vertical geothermal borehole fields," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1204-1220.
    11. Kurnia, Jundika C. & Putra, Zulfan A. & Muraza, Oki & Ghoreishi-Madiseh, Seyed Ali & Sasmito, Agus P., 2021. "Numerical evaluation, process design and techno-economic analysis of geothermal energy extraction from abandoned oil wells in Malaysia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 868-879.
    12. Yin, Hongmei & Zayed, Mohamed E. & Li, Yang & Yang, Liming & Fan, Yifan & Wang, Ziwei & Yin, Likun & Zhao, Jun & Al-Kbodi, Basher Hassan & Rehman, Shafiqur, 2024. "Thermo-economic performance of a leaky downhole coaxial geothermal system for maximizing geothermal energy production: Numerical investigation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    13. Wang, Gaosheng & Song, Xianzhi & Shi, Yu & Yang, Ruiyue & Yulong, Feixue & Zheng, Rui & Li, Jiacheng, 2021. "Heat extraction analysis of a novel multilateral-well coaxial closed-loop geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 974-986.
    14. Li, Mingqi & Shi, Yan & Chen, Hongxu & Liu, Chengcheng & Li, Hongchao, 2024. "Study on the heat transfer performance of coaxial casing heat exchanger for medium and deep geothermal energy in cold regions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PB).
    15. Luo, Jin & Zhang, Qi & Liang, Changming & Wang, Haiqi & Ma, Xinning, 2023. "An overview of the recent development of the Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP) system in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 269-279.
    16. Shi, Yu & Song, Xianzhi & Wang, Gaosheng & McLennan, John & Forbes, Bryan & Li, Xiaojiang & Li, Jiacheng, 2019. "Study on wellbore fluid flow and heat transfer of a multilateral-well CO2 enhanced geothermal system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 14-27.
    17. Deng, Jiewen & Su, Yangyang & Peng, Chenwei & Qiang, Wenbo & Cai, Wanlong & Wei, Qingpeng & Zhang, Hui, 2023. "How to improve the energy performance of mid-deep geothermal heat pump systems: Optimization of heat pump, system configuration and control strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    18. Joanna Piotrowska-Woroniak, 2021. "Assessment of Ground Regeneration around Borehole Heat Exchangers between Heating Seasons in Cold Climates: A Case Study in Bialystok (NE, Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    19. Matyska, Ctirad & Zábranová, Eliška, 2024. "Seasonal energy extraction and storage by deep coaxial borehole heat exchangers in a layered ground," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PA).
    20. Dong, Shihao & Yu, Yuelong & Li, Bingxue & Ni, Long, 2024. "Geologic and thermal conductivity analysis based on geophysical test and combined modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:6016-:d:1532998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.