IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i22p5591-d1517192.html

Production of Hydrogen from Biomass with Negative CO 2 Emissions Using a Commercial-Scale Fluidized Bed Gasifier

Author

Listed:
  • Tomasz Chmielniak

    (Department of Thermal and Fluid Flow Machines, Faculty of Energy and Fuels, AGH University of Krakow, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Tomasz Iluk

    (Department of Circular Economy, Institute of Energy and Fuel Processing Technology, ul. Zamkowa 1, 41-803 Zabrze, Poland)

  • Leszek Stepien

    (Department of Fuel Technology, Faculty of Energy and Fuels, AGH University of Krakow, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Tomasz Billig

    (Department of Circular Economy, Institute of Energy and Fuel Processing Technology, ul. Zamkowa 1, 41-803 Zabrze, Poland)

  • Marek Sciazko

    (Center of Energy, AGH University of Krakow, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

Biomass gasification, as a thermochemical method, has attracted interest due to the growing popularity of biofuel production using syngas or pure hydrogen. Additionally, this hydrogen production method, when integrated with CO 2 capture, may have negative CO 2 emissions, which makes this process competitive with electrolysis and coal gasification. This article presents the results of process and economic analyses of a hydrogen production system integrated with a commercial, fluidized-bed solid fuel gasification reactor (SES technology—Synthesis Energy Systems). With the use of a single gasification unit with a capacity of 60 t/h of raw biomass, the system produces between 72.5 and 78.4 t/d of hydrogen depending on the configuration considered. Additionally, assuming the CO 2 emission neutrality of biomass processing, the application of CO 2 capture leads to negative CO 2 emissions. This allows for obtaining additional revenue from the sale of CO 2 emission allowances, which can significantly reduce the costs of hydrogen production. In this analysis, the breakthrough price for CO 2 emissions, above which the hydrogen production costs are negative, is USD 240/t CO 2 .

Suggested Citation

  • Tomasz Chmielniak & Tomasz Iluk & Leszek Stepien & Tomasz Billig & Marek Sciazko, 2024. "Production of Hydrogen from Biomass with Negative CO 2 Emissions Using a Commercial-Scale Fluidized Bed Gasifier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-27, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:22:p:5591-:d:1517192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/22/5591/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/22/5591/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Xian & Shen, Ye & Wei, Liping & He, Chao & Lapkin, Alexei A. & Lipiński, Wojciech & Dai, Yanjun & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2020. "Hydrogen production of solar-driven steam gasification of sewage sludge in an indirectly irradiated fluidized-bed reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    2. Huang, Y.W. & Chen, M.Q. & Li, Q.H. & Xing, W., 2018. "Hydrogen-rich syngas produced from co-gasification of wet sewage sludge and torrefied biomass in self-generated steam agent," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 202-213.
    3. Lv, Pengmei & Wu, Chuangzhi & Ma, Longlong & Yuan, Zhenhong, 2008. "A study on the economic efficiency of hydrogen production from biomass residues in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1874-1879.
    4. Chen, Yunan & Yi, Lei & Yin, Jiarong & Jin, Hui & Guo, Liejin, 2022. "Sewage sludge gasification in supercritical water with fluidized bed reactor: Reaction and product characteristics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tatarczuk, Adam & Szega, Marcin & Billig, Tomasz & Więcław-Solny, Lucyna & Zdeb, Janusz, 2025. "Techno-economic analysis of heat integrated stripper application in chemical absorption process for CO2 capture: Insights from pilot plant studies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Fenghai & Zhao, Chaoyue & Guo, Qianqian & Li, Yang & Fan, Hongli & Guo, Mingxi & Wu, Lishun & Huang, Jiejie & Fang, Yitian, 2020. "Exploration in ash-deposition (AD) behavior modification of low-rank coal by manure addition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    2. Fan, Lanxin & Chen, Heng & Gao, Yue & Zhao, Huanlin & Yao, Lei & Li, Yu & Zhao, Shuyuan & Pan, Peiyuan, 2025. "Performance analysis of a novel power generation design containing the drying and Co-gasification of sludge and biomass integrated with the waste heat recovery of a cement plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    3. Mariyam, Sabah & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Mackey, Hamish. R & McKay, Gordon, 2022. "A critical review on co-gasification and co-pyrolysis for gas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Qi, Xingang & Li, Xujun & Huang, Yong & Guo, Shenghui & Chen, Yunan & Jin, Hui & Guo, Liejin, 2024. "Combining experiment and theory to study the mechanism of lignin supercritical water gasification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    5. Hajizadeh, Abdollah & Mohamadi-Baghmolaei, Mohamad & Cata Saady, Noori M. & Zendehboudi, Sohrab, 2022. "Hydrogen production from biomass through integration of anaerobic digestion and biogas dry reforming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    6. Li, Xian & Wei, Liping & Lim, Chia Wei & Chen, Jialing & Chu, Peng & Lipiński, Wojciech & Yan, Ning & Dai, Yanjun & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2022. "Experimental and numerical study on thermal performance of an indirectly irradiated solar reactor with a clapboard-type internally circulating fluidized bed," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    7. Anu, & Kumar, Anil & Rapoport, Alexander & Kunze, Gotthard & Kumar, Sanjeev & Singh, Davender & Singh, Bijender, 2020. "Multifarious pretreatment strategies for the lignocellulosic substrates for the generation of renewable and sustainable biofuels: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1228-1252.
    8. Liu, Huan & Guo, Wei & Liu, Shuqin, 2022. "Comparative techno-economic performance analysis of underground coal gasification and surface coal gasification based coal-to-hydrogen process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    9. Zhang, Jifu & Cui, Peizhe & Yang, Sheng & Zhou, Yaru & Du, Wei & Wang, Yinglong & Deng, Chengwei & Wang, Shuai, 2023. "Thermodynamic analysis of SOFC–CCHP system based on municipal sludge plasma gasification with carbon capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    10. Ayub, Yousaf & Moktadir, Md Abdul & Shi, Tao & Ren, Jingzheng, 2025. "Sewage sludge valorization into fuel: Process development, AI-driven optimization, and sustainable process selection using multi-variate path analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    11. Yahaya, Ahmad Zubair & Somalu, Mahendra Rao & Muchtar, Andanastuti & Sulaiman, Shaharin Anwar & Wan Daud, Wan Ramli, 2019. "Effect of particle size and temperature on gasification performance of coconut and palm kernel shells in downdraft fixed-bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 931-940.
    12. Mengze He & Ping Zhou & Xiqiang Zhao & Tao Wang, 2025. "Completion of Waste Heat Recovery and CO 2 Conversion Simultaneously Based on the Flue Gas Chemical Recuperative Cycle: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-25, January.
    13. Halina Pawlak-Kruczek & Mateusz Wnukowski & Lukasz Niedzwiecki & Michał Czerep & Mateusz Kowal & Krystian Krochmalny & Jacek Zgóra & Michał Ostrycharczyk & Marcin Baranowski & Wilhelm Jan Tic & Joanna, 2019. "Torrefaction as a Valorization Method Used Prior to the Gasification of Sewage Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Zuo, Hongyang & Zeng, Kuo & Lin, Meng & Yang, Haiping & Chen, Hanping, 2025. "Design of an advanced packed bed reactor for solar-driven biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    15. Sergey M. Frolov & Konstantin S. Panin & Viktor A. Smetanyuk, 2024. "Gasification of Liquid Hydrocarbon Waste by the Ultra-Superheated Mixture of Steam and Carbon Dioxide: A Thermodynamic Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Ren, Jingzheng & Gao, Suzhao & Tan, Shiyu & Dong, Lichun, 2015. "Hydrogen economy in China: Strengths–weaknesses–opportunities–threats analysis and strategies prioritization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1230-1243.
    17. Hu, Dianqi & Huang, Yong & Liu, Duanyang & Su, Lei & Shen, Ao & Chen, Yunan & Guo, Liejin, 2024. "Techno-economic analysis of sewage sludge supercritical water gasification for hydrogen and electricity co-generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    18. Zhang, Bowei & Guo, Simao & Jin, Hui, 2022. "Production forecast analysis of BP neural network based on Yimin lignite supercritical water gasification experiment results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    19. Ma, Tengyu & Wang, Ruilin & Wu, Haifeng & Hao, Junhong & Wang, Hongsheng, 2025. "Intelligent optimization of solar-driven biomass-plastic co-gasification system based on limited data mapping," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    20. Tomonori Miyagawa & Mika Goto, 2022. "Hydrogen Production Cost Forecasts since the 1970s and Implications for Technological Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:22:p:5591-:d:1517192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.