IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i20p5209-d1502307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heating Industrial Buildings with Heat Pump Air Systems: Is It Always the Most Advantageous Option?

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Noro

    (Department of Management and Engineering (DTG), University of Padova, 36100 Vicenza, Italy)

Abstract

According to extant Italian legislation implementing the Renewable Energy Directive, the mandatory renewable quota for a new building is 60% referring to a single service (e.g., heating during winter) or to multiple services (e.g., heating during winter and air conditioning during summer), depending on which services are actually present. The obligation to satisfy this minimum value often leads heating and ventilation plant designers to provide heat pump systems in industrial buildings, typically air/water or direct expansion type coupled with air terminals (air heaters or ventilation units) or radiant floors. The question is: Is this always the most advantageous option for industrial buildings? A typical industrial building was modeled by Trnsys ® in two different climates. Based on the calculated thermal heating loads, the condensing radiant tubes and heat pump coupled with the air heaters systems were analyzed through dynamic simulation, evaluating their performance from an energy, environmental impact, and economic point of view. The analysis carried out revealed that a heat pump system is not always the most advantageous solution depending on the climate, the characteristics of the building (less or more thermal insulation, which corresponds to existing buildings rather than new ones), and the size of the photovoltaics system eventually installed on the roof.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Noro, 2024. "Heating Industrial Buildings with Heat Pump Air Systems: Is It Always the Most Advantageous Option?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-23, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:20:p:5209-:d:1502307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/20/5209/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/20/5209/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Noro & Simone Mancin & Filippo Busato & Francesco Cerboni, 2023. "Innovative Hybrid Condensing Radiant System for Industrial Heating: An Energy and Economic Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Chinese, Damiana & Nardin, Gioacchino & Saro, Onorio, 2011. "Multi-criteria analysis for the selection of space heating systems in an industrial building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 556-565.
    3. Winskel, Mark & Heptonstall, Philip & Gross, Robert, 2024. "Reducing heat pump installed costs: Reviewing historic trends and assessing future prospects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
    4. António M. Raimundo & A. Virgílio M. Oliveira, 2024. "Assessing the Impact of Climate Changes, Building Characteristics, and HVAC Control on Energy Requirements under a Mediterranean Climate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-30, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia Reisinger & Patrick Hollinsky & Iva Kovacic, 2021. "Design Guideline for Flexible Industrial Buildings Integrating Industry 4.0 Parameters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Mohamed Ali Elleuch & Marwa Mallek & Ahmed Frikha & Wafik Hachicha & Awad M. Aljuaid & Murad Andejany, 2021. "Solving a Multiple User Energy Source Selection Problem Using a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Choudhary, Devendra & Shankar, Ravi, 2012. "An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 510-521.
    4. Wang, H., 2015. "A generalized MCDA–DEA (multi-criterion decision analysis–data envelopment analysis) approach to construct slacks-based composite indicator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 114-122.
    5. Diakaki, Christina & Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Kolokotsa, Dionyssia, 2013. "Performance study of a multi-objective mathematical programming modelling approach for energy decision-making in buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 534-542.
    6. Gourlis, Georgios & Kovacic, Iva, 2016. "A study on building performance analysis for energy retrofit of existing industrial facilities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1389-1399.
    7. Kabir, Golam & Sumi, Razia Sultana, 2014. "Power substation location selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and PROMETHEE: A case study from Bangladesh," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 717-730.
    8. Mardani, Abbas & Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras & Khalifah, Zainab & Zakuan, Norhayati & Jusoh, Ahmad & Nor, Khalil Md & Khoshnoudi, Masoumeh, 2017. "A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 216-256.
    9. Grujić, Miodrag & Ivezić, Dejan & Živković, Marija, 2014. "Application of multi-criteria decision-making model for choice of the optimal solution for meeting heat demand in the centralized supply system in Belgrade," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 341-350.
    10. Shahriyar Nasirov & Eugenio Cruz & Claudio A. Agostini & Carlos Silva, 2019. "Policy Makers’ Perspectives on the Expansion of Renewable Energy Sources in Chile’s Electricity Auctions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Ribeiro, Fernando & Ferreira, Paula & Araújo, Madalena, 2013. "Evaluating future scenarios for the power generation sector using a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) tool: The Portuguese case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 126-136.
    12. Elias Roumpakias & Tassos Stamatelos, 2023. "Comparative Performance Analysis of a Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Plant in Central Greece after Several Years of Operation Using Neural Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    13. Seddiki, Mohammed & Bennadji, Amar, 2019. "Multi-criteria evaluation of renewable energy alternatives for electricity generation in a residential building," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 101-117.
    14. Matteo Rivoire & Alessandro Casasso & Bruno Piga & Rajandrea Sethi, 2018. "Assessment of Energetic, Economic and Environmental Performance of Ground-Coupled Heat Pumps," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-23, July.
    15. Marco Noro & Simone Mancin & Filippo Busato & Francesco Cerboni, 2023. "Innovative Hybrid Condensing Radiant System for Industrial Heating: An Energy and Economic Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Alessandro Casasso & Pietro Capodaglio & Fulvio Simonetto & Rajandrea Sethi, 2019. "Environmental and Economic Benefits from the Phase-out of Residential Oil Heating: A Study from the Aosta Valley Region (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Raghu KC & Jarno Föhr & Tapio Ranta, 2023. "Public Perception on the Sustainable Energy Transition in Rural Finland: A Multi-criteria Approach," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 735-755, June.
    18. Ahmad, Salman & Tahar, Razman Mat, 2014. "Selection of renewable energy sources for sustainable development of electricity generation system using analytic hierarchy process: A case of Malaysia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 458-466.
    19. Nicolás Murúa & Aníbal Coronel & Alex Tello & Stefan Berres & Fernando Huancas, 2024. "GPU Accelerating Algorithms for Three-Layered Heat Conduction Simulations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-22, November.
    20. Carnero, María Carmen & Gómez, Andrés, 2017. "Maintenance strategy selection in electric power distribution systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 255-272.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:20:p:5209-:d:1502307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.