IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i19p4857-d1487414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How can Fossil-Energy-Free Technologies and Strategies (FEFTS) be adopted in European Farming?

Author

Listed:
  • Athanasios T. Balafoutis

    (Institute of Bio-Economy & Agro-Technology, Centre for Research & Technology Hellas, Dimarchou Georgiadou 118, 38333 Volos, Greece)

  • Bas Paris

    (Institute of Bio-Economy & Agro-Technology, Centre for Research & Technology Hellas, Dimarchou Georgiadou 118, 38333 Volos, Greece
    Department of Natural Resources and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos Str., 11855 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

This paper provides policy recommendations for accelerating the adoption of Fossil-Energy-Free Technologies and Strategies (FEFTS) in the EU agricultural sector. Faster adoption of these technologies and strategies is crucial to achieving the medium- and long-term sustainability targets laid out in EU policy. The prepared policy recommendations originate out of the key outputs and findings of the Horizon 2020 project “AgroFossilFree”, including an assessment and evaluation of the current energy use status in EU agriculture, survey results on farmers’ needs, ideas and interests on the adoption of FEFTS, FEFTS categories identified through an online inventory of FEFTS called the AgEnergy platform, and key innovative processes through national and transnational workshops that combine expertise from hundreds of keys stakeholders (researchers, innovation brokers, policymakers, farmers, and industry representatives). The policy recommendations are synthesized and presented in the form of 19 policy briefs split into three main categories: those that are related to energy issues in farming and can be applied to any farm and FEFTS type; those that are specific to certain agricultural production systems; and those that are necessary for FEFTS integration in agriculture in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Athanasios T. Balafoutis & Bas Paris, 2024. "How can Fossil-Energy-Free Technologies and Strategies (FEFTS) be adopted in European Farming?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:19:p:4857-:d:1487414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/19/4857/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/19/4857/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Poponi, Daniele & Basosi, Riccardo & Kurdgelashvili, Lado, 2021. "Subsidisation cost analysis of renewable energy deployment: A case study on the Italian feed-in tariff programme for photovoltaics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diana Enescu & Alessandro Ciocia & Udayanga I. K. Galappaththi & Harsha Wickramasinghe & Francesco Alagna & Angela Amato & Francisco Díaz-González & Filippo Spertino & Valeria Cocina, 2023. "Energy Tariff Policies for Renewable Energy Development: Comparison between Selected European Countries and Sri Lanka," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Zhao, Jing & Tang, Ou & Zhang, Qin & Zhou, Dequn, 2025. "Can reshoring policies hinder China's photovoltaic module exports? A dynamic perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    3. Zhou, Lei & Wang, Jiayue, 2025. "Microgrid operation strategies considering government subsidies and user preferences based on evolutionary games," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    4. Benalcazar, Pablo & Kalka, Maciej & Kamiński, Jacek, 2024. "From consumer to prosumer: A model-based analysis of costs and benefits of grid-connected residential PV-battery systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Chunhong Liu & Shisong Jiang & Hanfei Zhang & Ziyi Lu & Umberto Desideri, 2024. "China and Italy’s Energy Development Trajectories: Current Landscapes and Future Cooperation Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Zhou, Dequn & Dong, Zhuojia & Sang, Xiuzhi & Wang, Qunwei & Yu, Xianyu, 2023. "Do feed-in tariff reduction and green certificate trading effectively promote regional sustainable development？," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    7. Rossi, Federico & Heleno, Miguel & Basosi, Riccardo & Sinicropi, Adalgisa, 2021. "LCA driven solar compensation mechanism for Renewable Energy Communities: the Italian case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    8. Edoardo Ruffino & Bruno Piga & Alessandro Casasso & Rajandrea Sethi, 2022. "Heat Pumps, Wood Biomass and Fossil Fuel Solutions in the Renovation of Buildings: A Techno-Economic Analysis Applied to Piedmont Region (NW Italy)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Bangjun, Wang & Feng, Zhaolei & Feng, Ji & Yu, Pan & Cui, Linyu, 2022. "Decision making on investments in photovoltaic power generation projects based on renewable portfolio standard: Perspective of real option," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 1033-1045.
    10. Niccolò Caramanico & Giuseppe Di Florio & Maria Camilla Baratto & Viviana Cigolotti & Riccardo Basosi & Elena Busi, 2021. "Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Household Energy Systems Including Incentives on Energy Communities and Externalities: A Case Study in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:19:p:4857-:d:1487414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.