IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i12p2817-d1411063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Cost Reduction Potential of Demand Response in Balancing Markets from a System Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Wessel Bakker

    (Energy and Resources Group, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Vening Meinesz Building, Princetonlaan 8a, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Vandebron Energie B.V., Grote Bickersstraat 2a, 1013 KS Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Ioannis Lampropoulos

    (Energy and Resources Group, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Vening Meinesz Building, Princetonlaan 8a, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Demand response (DR) can potentially provide a cost-efficient alternative for balancing the electricity grid by replacing fossil-fuelled power plants for the provision of flexible capacity. This paper aims to quantify the cost reduction potential of DR from a system perspective. Historical data of balancing markets are studied using regression and average bid price analysis to quantify the effect of the participation of DR resources on the price of flexible capacity for the provision of balancing reserves by focusing on two case studies in Great Britain and the Netherlands. It is estimated that DR bids are, on average, 35% lower than the market average. The regression analysis concluded that 1% higher participation of DR in balancing markets leads, on average, to a 2.7% lower prices for flexible capacity. The results verify the hypothesis that flexible DR capacity is offered at a lower price on balancing markets compared to conventional generation resources, resulting in lower costs for grid operators to balance the grid, thus reducing societal costs for electricity provision and overall emissions through the integration of low-carbon balancing resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Wessel Bakker & Ioannis Lampropoulos, 2024. "The Cost Reduction Potential of Demand Response in Balancing Markets from a System Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:2817-:d:1411063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/12/2817/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/12/2817/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koliou, Elta & Bartusch, Cajsa & Picciariello, Angela & Eklund, Tobias & Söder, Lennart & Hakvoort, Rudi A., 2015. "Quantifying distribution-system operators' economic incentives to promote residential demand response," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 28-40.
    2. Lampropoulos, Ioannis & van den Broek, Machteld & van der Hoofd, Erik & Hommes, Klaas & van Sark, Wilfried, 2018. "A system perspective to the deployment of flexibility through aggregator companies in the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 534-551.
    3. Xiang, Yue & Cai, Hanhu & Gu, Chenghong & Shen, Xiaodong, 2020. "Cost-benefit analysis of integrated energy system planning considering demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    4. Klaassen, E.A.M. & van Gerwen, R.J.F. & Frunt, J. & Slootweg, J.G., 2017. "A methodology to assess demand response benefits from a system perspective: A Dutch case study," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 25-37.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mimica, Marko & Dominković, Dominik Franjo & Capuder, Tomislav & Krajačić, Goran, 2021. "On the value and potential of demand response in the smart island archipelago," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 153-168.
    2. Cruz, Marco R.M. & Fitiwi, Desta Z. & Santos, Sérgio F. & Catalão, João P.S., 2018. "A comprehensive survey of flexibility options for supporting the low-carbon energy future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 338-353.
    3. Majdalani, Naim & Aelenei, Daniel & Lopes, Rui Amaral & Silva, Carlos Augusto Santo, 2020. "The potential of energy flexibility of space heating and cooling in Portugal," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Osaru Agbonaye & Patrick Keatley & Ye Huang & Motasem Bani Mustafa & Neil Hewitt, 2020. "Design, Valuation and Comparison of Demand Response Strategies for Congestion Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-29, November.
    5. Wu, Xiao & Yang, Lihua & Zheng, Bingle, 2024. "Joint capacity configuration and demand response optimization of integrated energy system considering economic and dynamic control performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    6. Hou, Langbo & Tong, Xi & Chen, Heng & Fan, Lanxin & Liu, Tao & Liu, Wenyi & Liu, Tong, 2024. "Optimized scheduling of smart community energy systems considering demand response and shared energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    7. Derakhshan, Ghasem & Shayanfar, Heidar Ali & Kazemi, Ahad, 2016. "The optimization of demand response programs in smart grids," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 295-306.
    8. Simona-Vasilica Oprea & Adela Bâra & Răzvan Cristian Marales & Margareta-Stela Florescu, 2021. "Data Model for Residential and Commercial Buildings. Load Flexibility Assessment in Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Nayeem Rahman & Rodrigo Rabetino & Arto Rajala & Jukka Partanen, 2021. "Ushering in a New Dawn: Demand-Side Local Flexibility Platform Governance and Design in the Finnish Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    10. Niyam Haque & Anuradha Tomar & Phuong Nguyen & Guus Pemen, 2020. "Dynamic Tariff for Day-Ahead Congestion Management in Agent-Based LV Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Jiang, Meihui & Xu, Zhenjiang & Zhu, Hongyu & Hwang Goh, Hui & Agustiono Kurniawan, Tonni & Liu, Tianhao & Zhang, Dongdong, 2024. "Integrated demand response modeling and optimization technologies supporting energy internet," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    12. Li, Na & Hakvoort, Rudi A. & Lukszo, Zofia, 2021. "Cost allocation in integrated community energy systems - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    13. Liang, Ziwen & Mu, Longhua, 2024. "Multi-agent low-carbon optimal dispatch of regional integrated energy system based on mixed game theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    14. Li, Ke & Ye, Ning & Li, Shuzhen & Wang, Haiyang & Zhang, Chenghui, 2023. "Distributed collaborative operation strategies in multi-agent integrated energy system considering integrated demand response based on game theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    15. Dezhou Kong & Jianru Jing & Tingyue Gu & Xuanyue Wei & Xingning Sa & Yimin Yang & Zhiang Zhang, 2023. "Theoretical Analysis of Integrated Community Energy Systems (ICES) Considering Integrated Demand Response (IDR): A Review of the System Modelling and Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-22, May.
    16. Ioannidis, Filippos & Georgitsioti, Tatiani & Kosmidou, Kyriaki & Zopounidis, Constantinos & Andriosopoulos, Kostas, 2025. "A simulation model for imbalance costs of renewable energy aggregators: The case of Greek balancing market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    17. Saez, Yago & Mochon, Asuncion & Corona, Luis & Isasi, Pedro, 2019. "Integration in the European electricity market: A machine learning-based convergence analysis for the Central Western Europe region," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 549-566.
    18. Yang, Xiaohui & Chen, Zaixing & Huang, Xin & Li, Ruixin & Xu, Shaoping & Yang, Chunsheng, 2021. "Robust capacity optimization methods for integrated energy systems considering demand response and thermal comfort," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    19. Klaassen, E.A.M. & van Gerwen, R.J.F. & Frunt, J. & Slootweg, J.G., 2017. "A methodology to assess demand response benefits from a system perspective: A Dutch case study," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 25-37.
    20. Nijhuis, M. & Gibescu, M. & Cobben, J.F.G., 2017. "Analysis of reflectivity & predictability of electricity network tariff structures for household consumers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 631-641.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:2817-:d:1411063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.