IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i8p3531-d1127250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emerging Parameters Extraction Method of PV Modules Based on the Survival Strategies of Flying Foxes Optimization (FFO)

Author

Listed:
  • Radouane Aalloul

    (Laboratory of Engineering and Materials (LIMAT), Faculty of Sciences, Ben M’Sick Hassan II University of Casablanca, Casablanca 20000, Morocco
    Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering, Energy National Institute of Agricultural Research Settat, Settat 26000, Morocco)

  • Abdellah Elaissaoui

    (Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering, Energy National Institute of Agricultural Research Settat, Settat 26000, Morocco)

  • Mourad Benlattar

    (Matter Physics Laboratory (LPM), Faculty of Sciences, Ben M’Sick Hassan II University of Casablanca, Casablanca 20000, Morocco)

  • Rhma Adhiri

    (Laboratory of Engineering and Materials (LIMAT), Faculty of Sciences, Ben M’Sick Hassan II University of Casablanca, Casablanca 20000, Morocco)

Abstract

Nowadays, the world is encountering multiple challenges of energy security, economic recovery, and the effect of global warming. Investing in new fossil fuels only locks in uneconomic practices, sustains existing risks and increases the threats of climate change. In contrast, renewable energies, such as photovoltaic energy, constitute one of the most promising technologies in combating global increase in temperatures. Given its simplicity and low maintenance costs, photovoltaic energy is the most effective alternative to address the issues above. However, the standard test conditions (STCs) of PV modules are, in most cases, different from the real working conditions of a solar module. For instance, high levels of incident irradiation in an arid climate may cause the temperature of a module to rise by many degrees above the STC temperature of 25 °C, lowering the module’s performance. To effectively simulate and control PV systems for a given location, it has become paramount to develop a robust and accurate model that considers how PV modules behave. This study seeks to introduce an emerging metaheuristic optimization algorithm to estimate the unknown parameters of PV modules. The strategies deployed by flying foxes in the event of high temperatures have given birth to the development of a new metaheuristic algorithm called FFO. Contrary to previous methods, this new modeling procedure makes it possible to calculate all the parameters, regardless of temperature or irradiance. Four PV modules, having different technologies, were tested to evaluate the accuracy of the algorithm in question. The effectiveness of FFO is then contrasted with other well-known metaheuristics where single and double diode models are deployed. The results show that the FFO optimizer represents a substantial and compelling substitute for PV module extraction methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Radouane Aalloul & Abdellah Elaissaoui & Mourad Benlattar & Rhma Adhiri, 2023. "Emerging Parameters Extraction Method of PV Modules Based on the Survival Strategies of Flying Foxes Optimization (FFO)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:8:p:3531-:d:1127250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/8/3531/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/8/3531/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chennoufi, Khalid & Ferfra, Mohammed & Mokhlis, Mohcine, 2021. "An accurate modelling of Photovoltaic modules based on two-diode model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 294-305.
    2. Tsafarakis, Stelios & Zervoudakis, Konstantinos & Andronikidis, Andreas & Altsitsiadis, Efthymios, 2020. "Fuzzy self-tuning differential evolution for optimal product line design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1161-1169.
    3. Wang, Gang & Zhao, Ke & Shi, Jiangtao & Chen, Wei & Zhang, Haiyang & Yang, Xinsheng & Zhao, Yong, 2017. "An iterative approach for modeling photovoltaic modules without implicit equations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 189-198.
    4. Piliougine, M. & Guejia-Burbano, R.A. & Petrone, G. & Sánchez-Pacheco, F.J. & Mora-López, L. & Sidrach-de-Cardona, M., 2021. "Parameters extraction of single diode model for degraded photovoltaic modules," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 674-686.
    5. Sandrolini, L. & Artioli, M. & Reggiani, U., 2010. "Numerical method for the extraction of photovoltaic module double-diode model parameters through cluster analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 442-451, February.
    6. Benkercha, Rabah & Moulahoum, Samir & Taghezouit, Bilal, 2019. "Extraction of the PV modules parameters with MPP estimation using the modified flower algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1698-1709.
    7. Zhou, Wei & Yang, Hongxing & Fang, Zhaohong, 2007. "A novel model for photovoltaic array performance prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(12), pages 1187-1198, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abbassi, Rabeh & Abbassi, Abdelkader & Jemli, Mohamed & Chebbi, Souad, 2018. "Identification of unknown parameters of solar cell models: A comprehensive overview of available approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 453-474.
    2. Bonanno, F. & Capizzi, G. & Graditi, G. & Napoli, C. & Tina, G.M., 2012. "A radial basis function neural network based approach for the electrical characteristics estimation of a photovoltaic module," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 956-961.
    3. Lo Brano, Valerio & Ciulla, Giuseppina, 2013. "An efficient analytical approach for obtaining a five parameters model of photovoltaic modules using only reference data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 894-903.
    4. Chin, Vun Jack & Salam, Zainal, 2019. "A New Three-point-based Approach for the Parameter Extraction of Photovoltaic Cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 519-533.
    5. Sánchez Reinoso, Carlos R. & Milone, Diego H. & Buitrago, Román H., 2013. "Simulation of photovoltaic centrals with dynamic shading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 278-289.
    6. Chellaswamy, C. & Ramesh, R., 2016. "Parameter extraction of solar cell models based on adaptive differential evolution algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 823-837.
    7. Samuel R. Fahim & Hany M. Hasanien & Rania A. Turky & Shady H. E. Abdel Aleem & Martin Ćalasan, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review of Photovoltaic Modules Models and Algorithms Used in Parameter Extraction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-56, November.
    8. Hasan, M.A. & Parida, S.K., 2016. "An overview of solar photovoltaic panel modeling based on analytical and experimental viewpoint," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 75-83.
    9. Rawat, Rahul & Kaushik, S.C. & Lamba, Ravita, 2016. "A review on modeling, design methodology and size optimization of photovoltaic based water pumping, standalone and grid connected system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1506-1519.
    10. Mohamed Abdel-Basset & Reda Mohamed & Ripon K. Chakrabortty & Michael J. Ryan & Attia El-Fergany, 2021. "An Improved Artificial Jellyfish Search Optimizer for Parameter Identification of Photovoltaic Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-33, March.
    11. Jordehi, A. Rezaee, 2016. "Parameter estimation of solar photovoltaic (PV) cells: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 354-371.
    12. Aurel Gontean & Septimiu Lica & Szilard Bularka & Roland Szabo & Dan Lascu, 2017. "A Novel High Accuracy PV Cell Model Including Self Heating and Parameter Variation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Humada, Ali M. & Hojabri, Mojgan & Mekhilef, Saad & Hamada, Hussein M., 2016. "Solar cell parameters extraction based on single and double-diode models: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 494-509.
    14. Markus Mirz & Lukas Razik & Jan Dinkelbach & Halil Alper Tokel & Gholamreza Alirezaei & Rudolf Mathar & Antonello Monti, 2018. "A Cosimulation Architecture for Power System, Communication, and Market in the Smart Grid," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-12, February.
    15. Li, W. & Paul, M.C. & Baig, H. & Siviter, J. & Montecucco, A. & Mallick, T.K. & Knox, A.R., 2019. "A three-point-based electrical model and its application in a photovoltaic thermal hybrid roof-top system with crossed compound parabolic concentrator," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 400-415.
    16. Yadav, Pankaj & Tripathi, Brijesh & Rathod, Siddharth & Kumar, Manoj, 2013. "Real-time analysis of low-concentration photovoltaic systems: A review towards development of sustainable energy technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 812-823.
    17. Mahesh Vinayak Hadole & Kamlesh Narayan Tiwari & Prabodh Bajpai, 2021. "Energy generation and flow rate prediction of photovoltaic water pumping system for irrigation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 6722-6733, May.
    18. Edalati, Saeed & Ameri, Mehran & Iranmanesh, Masoud, 2015. "Comparative performance investigation of mono- and poly-crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules for use in grid-connected photovoltaic systems in dry climates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 255-265.
    19. Jiang, Lian Lian & Maskell, Douglas L. & Patra, Jagdish C., 2013. "Parameter estimation of solar cells and modules using an improved adaptive differential evolution algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 185-193.
    20. Wang, Meng & Peng, Jinqing & Luo, Yimo & Shen, Zhicheng & Yang, Hongxing, 2021. "Comparison of different simplistic prediction models for forecasting PV power output: Assessment with experimental measurements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:8:p:3531-:d:1127250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.