IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i22p7664-d1283648.html

Scalable Inverse Uncertainty Quantification by Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling and Variational Inference

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Wang

    (Department of Nuclear, Plasma and Radialogical Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA)

  • Xu Wu

    (Department of Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Ziyu Xie

    (Department of Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Tomasz Kozlowski

    (Department of Nuclear, Plasma and Radialogical Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA)

Abstract

Inverse Uncertainty Quantification (IUQ) has gained increasing attention in the field of nuclear engineering, especially nuclear thermal-hydraulics (TH), where it serves as an important tool for quantifying the uncertainties in the physical model parameters (PMPs) while making the model predictions consistent with the experimental data. In this paper, we present an extension to an existing Bayesian inference-based IUQ methodology by employing a hierarchical Bayesian model and variational inference (VI), and apply this novel framework to a real-world nuclear TH scenario. The proposed approach leverages a hierarchical model to encapsulate group-level behaviors inherent to the PMPs, thereby mitigating existing challenges posed by the high variability of PMPs under diverse experimental conditions and the potential overfitting issues due to unknown model discrepancies or outliers. To accommodate computational scalability and efficiency, we utilize VI to enable the framework to be used in applications with a large number of variables or datasets. The efficacy of the proposed method is evaluated against a previous study where a No-U-Turn-Sampler was used in a Bayesian hierarchical model. We illustrate the performance comparisons of the proposed framework through a synthetic data example and an applied case in nuclear TH. Our findings reveal that the presented approach not only delivers accurate and efficient IUQ without the need for manual tuning, but also offers a promising way for scaling to larger, more complex nuclear TH experimental datasets.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Wang & Xu Wu & Ziyu Xie & Tomasz Kozlowski, 2023. "Scalable Inverse Uncertainty Quantification by Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling and Variational Inference," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-23, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7664-:d:1283648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7664/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7664/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David M. Blei & Alp Kucukelbir & Jon D. McAuliffe, 2017. "Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticians," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(518), pages 859-877, April.
    2. Chen, Suiyao & Lu, Lu & Xiang, Yisha & Lu, Qing & Li, Mingyang, 2018. "A data heterogeneity modeling and quantification approach for field pre-assessment of chloride-induced corrosion in aging infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 123-135.
    3. Jae-Hyeon Bae & Kyoungsik Chang & Gong-Hee Lee & Byeong-Cheon Kim, 2022. "Bayesian Inference of Cavitation Model Coefficients and Uncertainty Quantification of a Venturi Flow Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Suiyao Chen & Nan Kong & Xuxue Sun & Hongdao Meng & Mingyang Li, 2019. "Claims data-driven modeling of hospital time-to-readmission risk with latent heterogeneity," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 156-179, March.
    5. Marc C. Kennedy & Anthony O'Hagan, 2001. "Bayesian calibration of computer models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(3), pages 425-464.
    6. Zio, E. & Pedroni, N., 2012. "Monte Carlo simulation-based sensitivity analysis of the model of a thermal–hydraulic passive system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 90-106.
    7. Hanchen Wang & Tianfan Fu & Yuanqi Du & Wenhao Gao & Kexin Huang & Ziming Liu & Payal Chandak & Shengchao Liu & Peter Katwyk & Andreea Deac & Anima Anandkumar & Karianne Bergen & Carla P. Gomes & Shir, 2023. "Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence," Nature, Nature, vol. 620(7972), pages 47-60, August.
    8. Hanchen Wang & Tianfan Fu & Yuanqi Du & Wenhao Gao & Kexin Huang & Ziming Liu & Payal Chandak & Shengchao Liu & Peter Katwyk & Andreea Deac & Anima Anandkumar & Karianne Bergen & Carla P. Gomes & Shir, 2023. "Publisher Correction: Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence," Nature, Nature, vol. 621(7978), pages 33-33, September.
    9. Laura Marie Helleckes & Michael Osthege & Wolfgang Wiechert & Eric von Lieres & Marco Oldiges, 2022. "Bayesian calibration, process modeling and uncertainty quantification in biotechnology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-46, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evangelos Katsamakas & Oleg V. Pavlov & Ryan Saklad, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and the transformation of higher education institutions," Papers 2402.08143, arXiv.org.
    2. Branda, Francesco & Ciccozzi, Massimo & Scarpa, Fabio, 2025. "Artificial intelligence in scientific research: Challenges, opportunities and the imperative of a human-centric synergy," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4).
    3. Francesco Venturini, 2025. "Generative AI and Income Growth: Early Evidence on Global Data," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 31-46.
    4. Fabian Dvorak & Regina Stumpf & Sebastian Fehrler & Urs Fischbacher, 2024. "Generative AI Triggers Welfare-Reducing Decisions in Humans," Papers 2401.12773, arXiv.org.
    5. Kaishuai Liu & Shuai Liu, 2025. "Advances in Applied Mathematics in Computer Vision," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-5, September.
    6. Song Tong & Kai Mao & Zhen Huang & Yukun Zhao & Kaiping Peng, 2024. "Automating psychological hypothesis generation with AI: when large language models meet causal graph," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Flavio Calvino & Luca Fontanelli, 2026. "Decoding AI: an early look at how French firms use AI," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 16(1), pages 51-93, March.
    8. Chen, Feng & Deng, Hongyu & Zhang, Xiaoying, 2024. "IG-ENT:A innovative ensemble approach for the flow prediction of main steam system in thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    9. Koehler, Maximilian & Sauermann, Henry, 2024. "Algorithmic management in scientific research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(4).
    10. Jianfeng Yao & Cancong Zhao & Xuefan Hu & Yingshan Jin & Yanling Li & Liming Cai & Zhuofan Li & Fang Li & Fang Liang, 2025. "A Method for Estimating Tree Growth Potential with Back Propagation Neural Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Fang Feng & Rongyan Zhu & Chunhui Wu & Jia Wei & Tinglan Huang & Mengmeng Wang, 2025. "Predicting Chinese Postgraduates’ Intention to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing: A Sequential Exploratory Mixed-Method Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, December.
    12. Wu, Chuntao & Li, Haoran & Yuan, Bingbing, 2025. "AI-driven sustainable energy saving: Pathways for enhancing energy efficiency in Chinese listed firms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 401(PA).
    13. Siluo Yang & Longfei Li & Yujie Jin & Qian feng, 2025. "How does social media mention academic papers? Evidence from WeChat in China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(8), pages 4621-4665, August.
    14. Giacomo Damioli & Vincent Van Roy & Daniel Vertesy & Marco Vivarelli, 2024. "AI as a new emerging technological paradigm: evidence from global patenting," DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Politica Economica dipe0038, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    15. Runhui Lin & Yalin Li & Wenchang Li & Ze Ji & Biting Li, 2025. "AI-enabled individual learning strategies and scientific innovation: a case from the field of computer science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(7), pages 3651-3677, July.
    16. Alexander Braafladt & Alicia Sudol & Dimitri Mavris, 2026. "AI-driven adaptive analysis for finding emergent behavior in military capability design," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 23(2), pages 255-270, April.
    17. Meng, Kai & Ba, Zhichao & Wang, Chunying & Li, Gang, 2025. "Unveiling intrinsic interactions of science and technology in artificial intelligence using a network portrait divergence approach," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    18. Anil R. Doshi & Oliver P. Hauser, 2023. "Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel content," Papers 2312.00506, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    19. Hui Li & Yichi Zhang & Zhaoxiong Wu & Zhe Wang & Tong Wu, 2025. "An Importance Sampling Method for Generating Optimal Interpolation Points in Training Physics-Informed Neural Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, January.
    20. Naudé, Wim, 2024. "What They Don't Teach You about Artificial Intelligence at Business School: Stagnation, Oil, and War," IZA Discussion Papers 17306, IZA Network @ LISER.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7664-:d:1283648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.