IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i22p7498-d1276524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comprehensive Multicriteria Evaluation Approach for Alternative Marine Fuels

Author

Listed:
  • Eleni Strantzali

    (Department of Naval Architecture, University of West Attica, 96 Agiou Spyridonos Street, 12210 Athens, Greece)

  • Georgios A. Livanos

    (Department of Naval Architecture, University of West Attica, 96 Agiou Spyridonos Street, 12210 Athens, Greece)

  • Konstantinos Aravossis

    (Sector of Industrial Management and Operational Research, School of Mechanical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Iroon Polytechniou 9, 15780 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

In the last decade, shipping decarbonization has accelerated rapidly in response to the regulatory framework. Shifting toward alternative marine fuel options is the subject of extensive study from stakeholders and researchers. This study attempts to propose a decision support model for alternative fuel evaluation. The decision-making process is multidimensional, comprising economic, technical, environmental, and social aspects, and has been carried out with the aid of the outranking multicriteria methodology, Promethee II. The approach is based on a comprehensive list of 11 criteria and 25 sub-criteria, covering all the crucial aspects. The weighting criteria process postulates the viewpoints of six stakeholder categories, including all the stakeholders’ preferences: shipowners, fuel suppliers, industry and engine manufacturers, academics, banks and the public. The results demonstrated that although LNG, MGO and HFO are classified in the highest positions, there are renewable options that also appear in high-ranking positions in most categories and especially among academics, banks, the public and in the combined case scenario. The commercially available options of drop-in biofuels, bio and e-LNG, fossil and bio methanol were ranked in these high positions. This approach offers insight into the assessment and selection of alternative marine fuel options, providing an incentive for strategic planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleni Strantzali & Georgios A. Livanos & Konstantinos Aravossis, 2023. "A Comprehensive Multicriteria Evaluation Approach for Alternative Marine Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7498-:d:1276524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7498/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7498/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Zaoli & Ahmad, Salman & Bernardi, Andrea & Shang, Wen-long & Xuan, Jin & Xu, Bing, 2023. "Evaluating alternative low carbon fuel technologies using a stakeholder participation-based q-rung orthopair linguistic multi-criteria framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    2. Julia Hansson & Selma Brynolf & Erik Fridell & Mariliis Lehtveer, 2020. "The Potential Role of Ammonia as Marine Fuel—Based on Energy Systems Modeling and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Alam Md Moshiul & Roslina Mohammad & Fariha Anjum Hira, 2023. "Alternative Fuel Selection Framework toward Decarbonizing Maritime Deep-Sea Shipping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-37, March.
    4. Jason Papathanasiou & Nikolaos Ploskas, 2018. "Multiple Criteria Decision Aid," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, number 978-3-319-91648-4, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Buckley Imhoff & Savvas Gkantonas & Epaminondas Mastorakos, 2021. "Analysing the Performance of Ammonia Powertrains in the Marine Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-41, November.
    2. Iva Ridjan Skov & Noémi Schneider & Gerald Schweiger & Josef-Peter Schöggl & Alfred Posch, 2021. "Power-to-X in Denmark: An Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Suneet Singh & Ashish Dwivedi & Saurabh Pratap, 2023. "Sustainable Maritime Freight Transportation: Current Status and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Chiong, Meng-Choung & Kang, Hooi-Siang & Shaharuddin, Nik Mohd Ridzuan & Mat, Shabudin & Quen, Lee Kee & Ten, Ki-Hong & Ong, Muk Chen, 2021. "Challenges and opportunities of marine propulsion with alternative fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    5. Michail Cheliotis & Evangelos Boulougouris & Nikoletta L Trivyza & Gerasimos Theotokatos & George Livanos & George Mantalos & Athanasios Stubos & Emmanuel Stamatakis & Alexandros Venetsanos, 2021. "Review on the Safe Use of Ammonia Fuel Cells in the Maritime Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Amin Salehpour Jam & Jamal Mosaffaie & Faramarz Sarfaraz & Samad Shadfar & Rouhangiz Akhtari, 2021. "GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 1025-1046, August.
    7. Vinicius Andrade dos Santos & Patrícia Pereira da Silva & Luís Manuel Ventura Serrano, 2022. "The Maritime Sector and Its Problematic Decarbonization: A Systematic Review of the Contribution of Alternative Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-30, May.
    8. Jeongmin Lee & Minseop Sim & Yulseong Kim & Changhee Lee, 2024. "Strategic Pathways to Alternative Marine Fuels: Empirical Evidence from Shipping Practices in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Rabin K. Jana & Dinesh K. Sharma & Peeyush Mehta, 2022. "A probabilistic fuzzy goal programming model for managing the supply of emergency relief materials," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 149-172, December.
    10. Raghunathan Krishankumar & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur Soundarapandian Ravichandran, 2023. "A Novel Integrated q-Rung Fuzzy Framework for Biomass Location Selection with No Apriori Weight Choices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Chia-Liang Lin & Jwu-Jenq Chen & Yu-Yu Ma, 2023. "Ranking of Service Quality Solution for Blended Design Teaching Using Fuzzy ANP and TOPSIS in the Post-COVID-19 Era," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, March.
    12. Alam Md Moshiul & Roslina Mohammad & Fariha Anjum Hira, 2023. "Alternative Fuel Selection Framework toward Decarbonizing Maritime Deep-Sea Shipping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-37, March.
    13. Granacher, Julia & Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Castro-Amoedo, Rafael & Maréchal, François, 2022. "Overcoming decision paralysis—A digital twin for decision making in energy system design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    14. Wagner Silva Costa & Plácido R. Pinheiro & Nádia M. dos Santos & Lucídio dos A. F. Cabral, 2023. "Aligning the Goals Hybrid Model for the Diagnosis of Mental Health Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-31, March.
    15. Ayough, Ashkan & Boshruei, Setareh & Khorshidvand, Behrooz, 2022. "A new interactive method based on multi-criteria preference degree functions for solar power plant site selection," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1165-1173.
    16. Maria Morfoulaki & Jason Papathanasiou, 2021. "Use of PROMETHEE MCDA Method for Ranking Alternative Measures of Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, March.
    17. Youngkyun Seo & Jiyoung An & Eunyoung Park & Jintae Kim & Meangik Cho & Seongjong Han & Jinkwang Lee, 2024. "Technical–Economic Analysis for Ammonia Ocean Transportation Using an Ammonia-Fueled Carrier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    18. Martin, Jonas & Neumann, Anne & Ødegård, Anders, 2023. "Renewable hydrogen and synthetic fuels versus fossil fuels for trucking, shipping and aviation: A holistic cost model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    19. Magdalena Klopott & Marzenna Popek & Ilona Urbanyi-Popiołek, 2023. "Seaports’ Role in Ensuring the Availability of Alternative Marine Fuels—A Multi-Faceted Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-30, March.
    20. Andrii Shekhovtsov & Volodymyr Kozlov & Viktor Nosov & Wojciech Sałabun, 2020. "Efficiency of Methods for Determining the Relevance of Criteria in Sustainable Transport Problems: A Comparative Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7498-:d:1276524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.