IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i20p7093-d1259765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calibrating the Ångström–Prescott Model with Solar Radiation Data Collected over Long and Short Periods of Time over the Tibetan Plateau

Author

Listed:
  • Jiandong Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Institute of Agro-Meteorology and Ecology, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Yanbo Shen

    (Public Meteorological Service Centre, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Guangsheng Zhou

    (State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Institute of Agro-Meteorology and Ecology, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • De-Li Liu

    (NSW Department of Primary Industries, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, PMB, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia)

  • Qiang Yu

    (State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Water and Soil Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Jun Du

    (Tibet Institute of Plateau Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Tibet Autonomous Meteorological Administration, Lhasa 850001, China)

Abstract

As the coefficients of the Ångström–Prescott model is site-dependent, the sparsity of radiation stations in regions like the Tibetan Plateau (TP) presents challenges for model calibration. Due to the unique climate and the clean air conditions over the TP, it might be feasible to calibrate the Ångström–Prescott model with short-term observations from scientific expeditions. To test this hypothesis, we used various datasets with different lengths at four stations, together with 435 daily radiations measured during a scientific expedition at Banga in the central TP from 2014 to 2015, to calibrate the Ångström–Prescott model. We found that calibration with a 1-year data length resulted in model performances comparable to those with a 20-year data length. Analysis of the expedition observations showed that the monthly average daily radiation ranged from 15.2 MJ/m 2 d in December 2014 to 26.5 MJ/m 2 d in July 2015, with an average value of 20.6 MJ/m 2 d. When this set of expedition data was used for calibration, the Ångström–Prescott model performed well with an NSE (Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency) of 0.820. If no data were available for calibration, the coefficients of the Ångström–Prescott model could also be directly calculated by parameterization methods established with calibrations at the other radiation stations. In this situation, the LiuJD method performed the best with the highest NSE of 0.792, followed by the LiuXY method with an NSE of 0.764. The FAO method performed poorly with an NSE of 0.578, while the Gopinathan method performed the worst with the lowest NSE of 0.218. Thus, the best strategy to calibrate the Ångström–Prescott model in the Tibetan Plateau is to use data from local observations, even if collected over short periods. When these are not available, the coefficients of the Ångström–Prescott model should be calculated using the parameterization method established with calibrations over the Tibetan Plateau.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiandong Liu & Yanbo Shen & Guangsheng Zhou & De-Li Liu & Qiang Yu & Jun Du, 2023. "Calibrating the Ångström–Prescott Model with Solar Radiation Data Collected over Long and Short Periods of Time over the Tibetan Plateau," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:20:p:7093-:d:1259765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/20/7093/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/20/7093/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luis Eduardo Ordoñez Palacios & Víctor Bucheli Guerrero & Hugo Ordoñez, 2022. "Machine Learning for Solar Resource Assessment Using Satellite Images," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Chang, Kai & Zhang, Qingyuan, 2019. "Improvement of the hourly global solar model and solar radiation for air-conditioning design in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1232-1238.
    3. Voyant, Cyril & Notton, Gilles & Kalogirou, Soteris & Nivet, Marie-Laure & Paoli, Christophe & Motte, Fabrice & Fouilloy, Alexis, 2017. "Machine learning methods for solar radiation forecasting: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 569-582.
    4. Liu, Jiandong & Linderholm, Hans & Chen, Deliang & Zhou, Xiuji & Flerchinger, Gerald N. & Yu, Qiang & Du, Jun & Wu, Dingrong & Shen, Yanbo & Yang, Zhenbin, 2015. "Changes in the relationship between solar radiation and sunshine duration in large cities of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 589-600.
    5. Li, Huashan & Ma, Weibin & Lian, Yongwang & Wang, Xianlong & Zhao, Liang, 2011. "Global solar radiation estimation with sunshine duration in Tibet, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 3141-3145.
    6. Xiaoyang Song & Yaohuan Huang & Chuanpeng Zhao & Yuxin Liu & Yanguo Lu & Yongguo Chang & Jie Yang, 2018. "An Approach for Estimating Solar Photovoltaic Potential Based on Rooftop Retrieval from Remote Sensing Images," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Adaramola, Muyiwa S., 2012. "Estimating global solar radiation using common meteorological data in Akure, Nigeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 38-44.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bayrakçı, Hilmi Cenk & Demircan, Cihan & Keçebaş, Ali, 2018. "The development of empirical models for estimating global solar radiation on horizontal surface: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2771-2782.
    2. Moldovan, Camelia Liliana & Păltănea, Radu & Visa, Ion, 2020. "Improvement of clear sky models for direct solar irradiance considering turbidity factor variable during the day," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 559-569.
    3. Guosheng Duan & Lifeng Wu & Fa Liu & Yicheng Wang & Shaofei Wu, 2022. "Improvement in Solar-Radiation Forecasting Based on Evolutionary KNEA Method and Numerical Weather Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Makade, Rahul G. & Jamil, Basharat, 2018. "Statistical analysis of sunshine based global solar radiation (GSR) models for tropical wet and dry climatic Region in Nagpur, India: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 22-43.
    5. Despotovic, Milan & Nedic, Vladimir & Despotovic, Danijela & Cvetanovic, Slobodan, 2015. "Review and statistical analysis of different global solar radiation sunshine models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1869-1880.
    6. Chen, Ji-Long & He, Lei & Yang, Hong & Ma, Maohua & Chen, Qiao & Wu, Sheng-Jun & Xiao, Zuo-lin, 2019. "Empirical models for estimating monthly global solar radiation: A most comprehensive review and comparative case study in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 91-111.
    7. Prieto, Jesús-Ignacio & García, David, 2022. "Global solar radiation models: A critical review from the point of view of homogeneity and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    8. Zhang, Jianyuan & Zhao, Li & Deng, Shuai & Xu, Weicong & Zhang, Ying, 2017. "A critical review of the models used to estimate solar radiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 314-329.
    9. Zang, Haixiang & Jiang, Xin & Cheng, LiLin & Zhang, Fengchun & Wei, Zhinong & Sun, Guoqiang, 2022. "Combined empirical and machine learning modeling method for estimation of daily global solar radiation for general meteorological observation stations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 795-808.
    10. Agga, Ali & Abbou, Ahmed & Labbadi, Moussa & El Houm, Yassine, 2021. "Short-term self consumption PV plant power production forecasts based on hybrid CNN-LSTM, ConvLSTM models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 101-112.
    11. Mousavi, Navid & Kothapalli, Ganesh & Habibi, Daryoush & Das, Choton K. & Baniasadi, Ali, 2020. "A novel photovoltaic-pumped hydro storage microgrid applicable to rural areas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    12. Mecibah, Mohamed Salah & Boukelia, Taqiy Eddine & Tahtah, Reda & Gairaa, Kacem, 2014. "Introducing the best model for estimation the monthly mean daily global solar radiation on a horizontal surface (Case study: Algeria)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 194-202.
    13. Erik Heilmann & Janosch Henze & Heike Wetzel, 2021. "Machine learning in energy forecasts with an application to high frequency electricity consumption data," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202135, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    14. Ke Yan & Xudong Wang & Yang Du & Ning Jin & Haichao Huang & Hangxia Zhou, 2018. "Multi-Step Short-Term Power Consumption Forecasting with a Hybrid Deep Learning Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    15. Ping-Huan Kuo & Chiou-Jye Huang, 2018. "A Green Energy Application in Energy Management Systems by an Artificial Intelligence-Based Solar Radiation Forecasting Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, April.
    16. Zoltan Varga & Ervin Racz, 2022. "Machine Learning Analysis on the Performance of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell—Thermoelectric Generator Hybrid System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, October.
    17. Lu, Yunbo & Wang, Lunche & Zhu, Canming & Zou, Ling & Zhang, Ming & Feng, Lan & Cao, Qian, 2023. "Predicting surface solar radiation using a hybrid radiative Transfer–Machine learning model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    18. Paik, Chunhyun & Chung, Yongjoo & Kim, Young Jin, 2021. "ELCC-based capacity credit estimation accounting for uncertainties in capacity factors and its application to solar power in Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 833-841.
    19. Ghasemi Mobtaker, Hassan & Ajabshirchi, Yahya & Ranjbar, Seyed Faramarz & Matloobi, Mansour, 2016. "Solar energy conservation in greenhouse: Thermal analysis and experimental validation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 509-519.
    20. Da Liu & Kun Sun & Han Huang & Pingzhou Tang, 2018. "Monthly Load Forecasting Based on Economic Data by Decomposition Integration Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:20:p:7093-:d:1259765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.