IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i14p5541-d1199883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate Impact Comparison of Biomass Combustion and Pyrolysis with Different Applications for Biochar Based on LCA

Author

Listed:
  • Sahar Safarian

    (Life Cycle Management Group, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Aschebergsgatan 44, 411 33 Gothenburg, Sweden)

Abstract

Biochar can be useful to overcome several environmental challenges in different sectors of energy, industry, and agriculture. However, there are currently only a limited number of studies with the employment of biochar for various applications and their environmental impacts. This study develops an LCA framework to evaluate the climate impacts of biochar production and its applications in soil enhancement and as a substitute for coal-based fuels in steel industries and then compares it with conventional biomass usage for energy production for Sweden, Italy, and Poland. Various pyrolysis operating temperatures are also considered to determine the optimal conditions for each location. The results show that biomass pyrolysis with biochar usage in the agricultural sector has the least environmental impact with the most significant potential in Poland followed by Italy. lower temperatures (around 350 °C) are more favorable for Sweden in terms of CO 2 emissions, due to the country’s renewable energy-based electrical system. Low to moderate temperatures (350–500 °C) are found to be optimal for pyrolysis temperature in Italy, while higher temperatures (around 650 °C) yield the highest GHG reduction for both biochar applications in Poland.

Suggested Citation

  • Sahar Safarian, 2023. "Climate Impact Comparison of Biomass Combustion and Pyrolysis with Different Applications for Biochar Based on LCA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-11, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:14:p:5541-:d:1199883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/14/5541/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/14/5541/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sahar Safarian & Magnus Rydén & Matty Janssen, 2022. "Development and Comparison of Thermodynamic Equilibrium and Kinetic Approaches for Biomass Pyrolysis Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Yao, Zhiyi & You, Siming & Ge, Tianshu & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2018. "Biomass gasification for syngas and biochar co-production: Energy application and economic evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 43-55.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zygmunt Stanula & Marek Wieruszewski & Adam Zydroń & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2023. "Optimizing Forest-Biomass-Distribution Logistics from a Multi-Level Perspective—Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Linzheng & Zhang, Ruizhi & Deng, Ruiqu & Liu, Zeqing & Luo, Yonghao, 2023. "Comprehensive parametric study of fixed-bed co-gasification process through Multiple Thermally Thick Particle (MTTP) model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    2. Jun Sheng Teh & Yew Heng Teoh & Heoy Geok How & Thanh Danh Le & Yeoh Jun Jie Jason & Huu Tho Nguyen & Dong Lin Loo, 2021. "The Potential of Sustainable Biomass Producer Gas as a Waste-to-Energy Alternative in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-31, April.
    3. Setyawan, M. Ismail Bagus & Dafiqurrohman, Hafif & Akbar, Maha Hidayatullah & Surjosatyo, Adi, 2021. "Characterizing a two-stage downdraft biomass gasifier using a representative particle model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 750-767.
    4. Teng, Su & Hamrang, Farzad & Ashraf Talesh, Seyed Saman, 2021. "Economic performance assessment of a novel combined power generation cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    5. Zhang, Zhikun & Zhu, Zongyuan & Shen, Boxiong & Liu, Lina, 2019. "Insights into biochar and hydrochar production and applications: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 581-598.
    6. Nimmanterdwong, Prathana & Chalermsinsuwan, Benjapon & Piumsomboon, Pornpote, 2023. "Optimizing utilization pathways for biomass to chemicals and energy by integrating emergy analysis and particle swarm optimization (PSO)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 1448-1459.
    7. Vakalis, Stergios & Moustakas, Konstantinos, 2019. "Modelling of advanced gasification systems (MAGSY): Simulation and validation for the case of the rising co-current reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 526-533.
    8. Zhang, Jingxin & Hu, Qiang & Qu, Yiyuan & Dai, Yanjun & He, Yiliang & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Tong, Yen Wah, 2020. "Integrating food waste sorting system with anaerobic digestion and gasification for hydrogen and methane co-production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    9. Kuo, Yen-Ting & Almansa, G. Aranda & Vreugdenhil, B.J., 2018. "Catalytic aromatization of ethylene in syngas from biomass to enhance economic sustainability of gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 21-30.
    10. Simone Marzeddu & Andrea Cappelli & Andrea Ambrosio & María Alejandra Décima & Paolo Viotti & Maria Rosaria Boni, 2021. "A Life Cycle Assessment of an Energy-Biochar Chain Involving a Gasification Plant in Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-29, November.
    11. Tong, Huanhuan & Shen, Ye & Zhang, Jingxin & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Ge, Tian Shu & Tong, Yen Wah, 2018. "A comparative life cycle assessment on four waste-to-energy scenarios for food waste generated in eateries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 1143-1157.
    12. AlNouss, Ahmed & Parthasarathy, Prakash & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Mackey, Hamish & McKay, Gordon, 2020. "Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of coconut coir pith-biomass gasification using ASPEN PLUS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    13. Mauro Villarini & Vera Marcantonio & Andrea Colantoni & Enrico Bocci, 2019. "Sensitivity Analysis of Different Parameters on the Performance of a CHP Internal Combustion Engine System Fed by a Biomass Waste Gasifier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    14. Kächele, Rebecca & Nurkowski, Daniel & Martin, Jacob & Akroyd, Jethro & Kraft, Markus, 2019. "An assessment of the viability of alternatives to biodiesel transport fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Habibollahzade, Ali & Gholamian, Ehsan & Behzadi, Amirmohammad, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization and comparative performance analysis of hybrid biomass-based solid oxide fuel cell/solid oxide electrolyzer cell/gas turbine using different gasification agents," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 985-1002.
    16. Lopes, J.V.M. & Bresciani, A.E. & Carvalho, K.M. & Kulay, L.A. & Alves, R.M.B., 2021. "Multi-criteria decision approach to select carbon dioxide and hydrogen sources as potential raw materials for the production of chemicals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    17. Khodaei, Hassan & Olson, Chris & Nikrityuk, Petr, 2019. "Numerical investigations of the impact of inflow conditions on characteristics of a large-scale pyrolysis unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1101-1111.
    18. Grzegorz Czerski, 2022. "Pyrolysis and Gasification of Biomass and Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-5, October.
    19. Farzad Hamrang & Afshar Shokri & S. M. Seyed Mahmoudi & Biuk Ehghaghi & Marc A. Rosen, 2020. "Performance Analysis of a New Electricity and Freshwater Production System Based on an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle and Multi-Effect Desalination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-29, September.
    20. Ascher, Simon & Watson, Ian & Wang, Xiaonan & You, Siming, 2019. "Township-based bioenergy systems for distributed energy supply and efficient household waste re-utilisation: Techno-economic and environmental feasibility," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 455-467.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:14:p:5541-:d:1199883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.