IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i14p5316-d1191826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Triple-Objective Optimization of SCO 2 Brayton Cycles for Next-Generation Solar Power Tower

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Qiu

    (School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Erqi E

    (School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Qing Li

    (School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

In this paper, the SCO 2 Brayton regenerative and recompression cycles are studied and optimized for a next-generation solar power tower under a maximum cycle temperature of over 700 °C. First, a steady-state thermodynamic model is developed and validated, and the impacts of different operating parameters on three critical performance indexes, including the cycle thermal efficiency, specific work, and heat storage temperature difference, are analyzed. The results reveal that these performance indexes are influenced by the operating pressures, the SCO 2 split ratio, and the effectiveness of the regenerators in complex ways. Subsequently, considering the three performance indexes as the optimization objectives, a triple-objective optimization is carried out to determine the optimal operating variables with the aim of obtaining Pareto solutions for both cycles. The optimization indicates that the regenerative cycle can achieve the maximum heat storage temperature difference and the maximum specific work of 396.4 °C and 180.6 kW·kg −1 , respectively, while the recompression cycle can reach the maximum thermal efficiency of 55.95%. Moreover, the optimized maximum and minimum pressure values of both cycles are found to be around 30 MPa and 8.2 MPa, respectively. Additionally, the distributions of the optimized values of the regenerator effectiveness and the SCO 2 split ratio show different influences on the performance of the cycles. Therefore, different cycles with different optimized variables should be considered to achieve specific cycle performance. When considering thermal efficiency as the most important performance index, the recompression cycle should be adopted. Meanwhile, its SCO 2 split ratio and the regenerator effectiveness should be close to 0.7 and 0.95, respectively. When considering heat storage temperature difference or specific work as the most important performance index, the regenerative cycle should be adopted. Meanwhile, its regenerator effectiveness should be close to 0.75. The results from this study will be helpful for the optimization of superior SCO 2 cycles for next-generation solar tower plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Qiu & Erqi E & Qing Li, 2023. "Triple-Objective Optimization of SCO 2 Brayton Cycles for Next-Generation Solar Power Tower," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:14:p:5316-:d:1191826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/14/5316/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/14/5316/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Jikang & Zhang, Yuanting & Zhang, Weichen & Qiu, Yu & Li, Qing, 2022. "Design and evaluation of a lab-scale tungsten receiver for ultra-high-temperature solar energy harvesting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    2. PraveenKumar, Seepana & Agyekum, Ephraim Bonah & Kumar, Abhinav & Velkin, Vladimir Ivanovich, 2023. "Performance evaluation with low-cost aluminum reflectors and phase change material integrated to solar PV modules using natural air convection: An experimental investigation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    3. Qiu, Yu & Li, Ming-Jia & Wang, Kun & Liu, Zhan-Bin & Xue, Xiao-Dai, 2017. "Aiming strategy optimization for uniform flux distribution in the receiver of a linear Fresnel solar reflector using a multi-objective genetic algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1394-1407.
    4. Qiu, Yu & Zhang, Yuanting & Li, Qing & Xu, Yucong & Wen, Zhe-Xi, 2020. "A novel parabolic trough receiver enhanced by integrating a transparent aerogel and wing-like mirrors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    5. Qiu, Yu & He, Ya-Ling & Wu, Ming & Zheng, Zhang-Jing, 2016. "A comprehensive model for optical and thermal characterization of a linear Fresnel solar reflector with a trapezoidal cavity receiver," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 129-144.
    6. Wang, Xurong & Li, Xiaoxiao & Li, Qibin & Liu, Lang & Liu, Chao, 2020. "Performance of a solar thermal power plant with direct air-cooled supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle under off-design conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    7. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    8. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "A review on integrated design and off-design operation of solar power tower system with S–CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    9. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Ehsan, M. Monjurul & Guan, Zhiqiang & Gurgenci, Hal & Klimenko, Alexander, 2020. "Feasibility of dry cooling in supercritical CO2 power cycle in concentrated solar power application: Review and a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Crespi, Francesco & Sánchez, David & Rodríguez, José M. & Gavagnin, Giacomo, 2020. "A thermo-economic methodology to select sCO2 power cycles for CSP applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P3), pages 2905-2912.
    12. He, Ya-Ling & Qiu, Yu & Wang, Kun & Yuan, Fan & Wang, Wen-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Guo, Jia-Qi, 2020. "Perspective of concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    13. Gokul Iyer & Yang Ou & James Edmonds & Allen A. Fawcett & Nathan Hultman & James McFarland & Jay Fuhrman & Stephanie Waldhoff & Haewon McJeon, 2022. "Ratcheting of climate pledges needed to limit peak global warming," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(12), pages 1129-1135, December.
    14. Alaric Christian Montenon & Rowida Meligy, 2022. "Control Strategies Applied to a Heat Transfer Loop of a Linear Fresnel Collector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, May.
    15. Xiao, Yang & Bao, Yanqiong & Yu, Linfeng & Zheng, Xiong & Qin, Guangzhao & Chen, Meijie & He, Maogang, 2023. "Ultra-stable carbon quantum dot nanofluids as excellent spectral beam splitters in PV/T applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    16. Ye, Kai & Li, Qing & Zhang, Yuanting & Qiu, Yu & Liu, Bin, 2022. "An efficient receiver tube enhanced by a solar transparent aerogel for solar power tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    17. Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Atif, Maimoon, 2015. "Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 61-71.
    18. Wang, Kun & Li, Ming-Jia & Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Peiwen & Liu, Zhan-Bin, 2018. "A systematic comparison of different S-CO2 Brayton cycle layouts based on multi-objective optimization for applications in solar power tower plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 109-121.
    19. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & He, Ya-Ling & Xu, Jin-Liang, 2019. "A study of new method and comprehensive evaluation on the improved performance of solar power tower plant with the CO2-based mixture cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "A review on integrated design and off-design operation of solar power tower system with S–CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    2. Aofang Yu & Wen Su & Li Zhao & Xinxing Lin & Naijun Zhou, 2020. "New Knowledge on the Performance of Supercritical Brayton Cycle with CO 2 -Based Mixtures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Qiu, Yu & Xu, Yucong & Li, Qing & Wang, Jikang & Wang, Qiliang & Liu, Bin, 2021. "Efficiency enhancement of a solar trough collector by combining solar and hot mirrors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    4. Xu, Zhen & Liu, Xinxin & Xie, Yingchun, 2023. "Off-design performances of a dry-cooled supercritical recompression Brayton cycle using CO2–H2S as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    5. He, Ya-Ling & Qiu, Yu & Wang, Kun & Yuan, Fan & Wang, Wen-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Guo, Jia-Qi, 2020. "Perspective of concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    6. Zhang, Yuanting & Qiu, Yu & Li, Qing & Henry, Asegun, 2022. "Optical-thermal-mechanical characteristics of an ultra-high-temperature graphite receiver designed for concentrating solar power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    7. Li, Qing & Wang, Jikang & Qiu, Yu & Xu, Mingpan & Wei, Xiudong, 2021. "A modified indirect flux mapping system for high-flux solar simulators," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    8. Ma, Ning & Meng, Fugui & Hong, Wenpeng & Li, Haoran & Niu, Xiaojuan, 2023. "Thermodynamic assessment of the dry-cooling supercritical Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar power tower plant enabled by CO2-propane mixture," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 649-663.
    9. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Yan, Jun-Jie & Wang, Kun, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance analysis of different supercritical Brayton cycles using CO2-based binary mixtures in the molten salt solar power tower systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 785-798.
    10. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Off-design performance of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with a solar power tower system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    11. Sleiti, Ahmad K. & Al-Ammari, Wahib A., 2021. "Off-design performance analysis of combined CSP power and direct oxy-combustion supercritical carbon dioxide cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 14-29.
    12. Arias, I. & Cardemil, J. & Zarza, E. & Valenzuela, L. & Escobar, R., 2022. "Latest developments, assessments and research trends for next generation of concentrated solar power plants using liquid heat transfer fluids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    13. Ehsan, M. Monjurul & Guan, Zhiqiang & Gurgenci, Hal & Klimenko, Alexander, 2020. "Feasibility of dry cooling in supercritical CO2 power cycle in concentrated solar power application: Review and a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    14. Yu, Aofang & Xing, Lingli & Su, Wen & Liu, Pei, 2023. "State-of-the-art review on the CO2 combined power and cooling system: System configuration, modeling and performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    15. Paul Tafur-Escanta & Robert Valencia-Chapi & Ignacio López-Paniagua & Luis Coco-Enríquez & Javier Muñoz-Antón, 2021. "Supercritical CO 2 Binary Mixtures for Recompression Brayton s-CO 2 Power Cycles Coupled to Solar Thermal Energy Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-27, July.
    16. Niu, Xiaojuan & Ma, Ning & Bu, Zhengkun & Hong, Wenpeng & Li, Haoran, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of supercritical Brayton cycles using CO2-based binary mixtures for solar power tower system application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    17. Ma, Yuegeng & Morozyuk, Tatiana & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2019. "Optimal integration of recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle with main compression intercooling in solar power tower system based on exergoeconomic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1134-1154.
    18. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & He, Ya-Ling & Xu, Jin-Liang, 2019. "A study of new method and comprehensive evaluation on the improved performance of solar power tower plant with the CO2-based mixture cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    19. Yang, Yueming & Wang, Xurong & Hooman, Kamel & Han, Kuihua & Xu, Jinliang & He, Suoying & Qi, Jianhui, 2023. "Effect of CO2-based binary mixtures on the performance of radial-inflow turbines for the supercritical CO2 cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    20. Wang, Kun & Li, Ming-Jia & Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Peiwen & Liu, Zhan-Bin, 2018. "A systematic comparison of different S-CO2 Brayton cycle layouts based on multi-objective optimization for applications in solar power tower plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 109-121.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:14:p:5316-:d:1191826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.