IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i10p4168-d1149949.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting Biomass Yields of Advanced Switchgrass Cultivars for Bioenergy and Ecosystem Services Using Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Jules F. Cacho

    (Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA)

  • Jeremy Feinstein

    (Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA)

  • Colleen R. Zumpf

    (Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA)

  • Yuki Hamada

    (Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA)

  • Daniel J. Lee

    (Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA)

  • Nictor L. Namoi

    (Department of Crop Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801, USA)

  • DoKyoung Lee

    (Department of Crop Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801, USA)

  • Nicholas N. Boersma

    (Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, 1223 Agronomy Hall, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

  • Emily A. Heaton

    (Department of Crop Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801, USA)

  • John J. Quinn

    (Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA)

  • Cristina Negri

    (Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA)

Abstract

The production of advanced perennial bioenergy crops within marginal areas of the agricultural landscape is gaining interest due to its potential to sustainably produce feedstocks for biofuels and bioproducts while also improving the sustainability and resilience of commodity crop production. However, predicting the biomass yields of this production system is challenging because marginal areas are often relatively small and spread around agricultural fields and are typically associated with various abiotic conditions that limit crop production. Machine learning (ML) offers a viable solution as a biomass yield prediction tool because it is suited to predicting relationships with complex functional associations. The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate the accuracy of commonly applied ML algorithms in agricultural applications for predicting the biomass yields of advanced switchgrass cultivars for bioenergy and ecosystem services and (2) determine the most important biomass yield predictors. Datasets on biomass yield, weather, land marginality, soil properties, and agronomic management were generated from three field study sites in two U.S. Midwest states (Illinois and Iowa) over three growing seasons. The ML algorithms evaluated in the study included random forests (RFs), gradient boosting machines (GBMs), artificial neural networks (ANNs), K-neighbors regressor (KNR), AdaBoost regressor (ABR), and partial least squares regression (PLSR). Coefficient of determination (R 2 ) and mean absolute error (MAE) were used to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the tested algorithms. Results showed that the ensemble methods, RF (R 2 = 0.86, MAE = 0.62 Mg/ha), GBM (R 2 = 0.88, MAE = 0.57 Mg/ha), and GBM (R 2 = 0.78, MAE = 0.66 Mg/ha), were the most accurate in predicting biomass yields of the Independence, Liberty, and Shawnee switchgrass cultivars, respectively. This is in agreement with similar studies that apply ML to multi-feature problems where traditional statistical methods are less applicable and datasets used were considered to be relatively small for ANNs. Consistent with previous studies on switchgrass, the most important predictors of biomass yield included average annual temperature, average growing season temperature, sum of the growing season precipitation, field slope, and elevation. This study helps pave the way for applying ML as a management tool for alternative bioenergy landscapes where understanding agronomic and environmental performance of a multifunctional cropping system seasonally and interannually at the sub-field scale is critical.

Suggested Citation

  • Jules F. Cacho & Jeremy Feinstein & Colleen R. Zumpf & Yuki Hamada & Daniel J. Lee & Nictor L. Namoi & DoKyoung Lee & Nicholas N. Boersma & Emily A. Heaton & John J. Quinn & Cristina Negri, 2023. "Predicting Biomass Yields of Advanced Switchgrass Cultivars for Bioenergy and Ecosystem Services Using Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:4168-:d:1149949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/10/4168/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/10/4168/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaul, Monisha & Hill, Robert L. & Walthall, Charles, 2005. "Artificial neural networks for corn and soybean yield prediction," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Yuki Hamada & Colleen R. Zumpf & Jules F. Cacho & DoKyoung Lee & Cheng-Hsien Lin & Arvid Boe & Emily Heaton & Robert Mitchell & Maria Cristina Negri, 2021. "Remote Sensing-Based Estimation of Advanced Perennial Grass Biomass Yields for Bioenergy," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    3. J. F. Cacho & M. C. Negri & C. R. Zumpf & P. Campbell, 2018. "Introducing perennial biomass crops into agricultural landscapes to address water quality challenges and provide other environmental services," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(2), March.
    4. Hyeon-Woo Kang & Hang-Bong Kang, 2017. "Prediction of crime occurrence from multi-modal data using deep learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Charles R. Harris & K. Jarrod Millman & Stéfan J. Walt & Ralf Gommers & Pauli Virtanen & David Cournapeau & Eric Wieser & Julian Taylor & Sebastian Berg & Nathaniel J. Smith & Robert Kern & Matti Picu, 2020. "Array programming with NumPy," Nature, Nature, vol. 585(7825), pages 357-362, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuki Hamada & Colleen R. Zumpf & John J. Quinn & Maria Cristina Negri, 2023. "Estimating Field-Level Perennial Bioenergy Grass Biomass Yields Using the Normalized Difference Red-Edge Index and Linear Regression Analysis for Central Virginia, USA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Xiangjuan Liu & Qiaonan Yang & Rurou Yang & Lin Liu & Xibing Li, 2024. "Corn Yield Prediction Based on Dynamic Integrated Stacked Regression," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geeraert, Joke & Rocha, Luis E.C. & Vandeviver, Christophe, 2024. "The impact of violent behavior on co-offender selection: Evidence of behavioral homophily," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Furqan Dar & Samuel R. Cohen & Diana M. Mitrea & Aaron H. Phillips & Gergely Nagy & Wellington C. Leite & Christopher B. Stanley & Jeong-Mo Choi & Richard W. Kriwacki & Rohit V. Pappu, 2024. "Biomolecular condensates form spatially inhomogeneous network fluids," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. López Pérez, Mario & Mansilla Corona, Ricardo, 2022. "Ordinal synchronization and typical states in high-frequency digital markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 598(C).
    4. Jessica M. Vanslambrouck & Sean B. Wilson & Ker Sin Tan & Ella Groenewegen & Rajeev Rudraraju & Jessica Neil & Kynan T. Lawlor & Sophia Mah & Michelle Scurr & Sara E. Howden & Kanta Subbarao & Melissa, 2022. "Enhanced metanephric specification to functional proximal tubule enables toxicity screening and infectious disease modelling in kidney organoids," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Dennis Bontempi & Leonard Nuernberg & Suraj Pai & Deepa Krishnaswamy & Vamsi Thiriveedhi & Ahmed Hosny & Raymond H. Mak & Keyvan Farahani & Ron Kikinis & Andrey Fedorov & Hugo J. W. L. Aerts, 2024. "End-to-end reproducible AI pipelines in radiology using the cloud," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Pablo García-Risueño, 2025. "Historical Simulation Systematically Underestimates the Expected Shortfall," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-12, January.
    7. Lauren L. Porter & Allen K. Kim & Swechha Rimal & Loren L. Looger & Ananya Majumdar & Brett D. Mensh & Mary R. Starich & Marie-Paule Strub, 2022. "Many dissimilar NusG protein domains switch between α-helix and β-sheet folds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Ali Rezaei & Virág Kocsis-Jutka & Zeynep I. Gunes & Qing Zeng & Georg Kislinger & Franz Bauernschmitt & Huseyin Berkcan Isilgan & Laura R. Parisi & Tuğberk Kaya & Sören Franzenburg & Jonas Koppenbrink, 2025. "Correction of dysregulated lipid metabolism normalizes gene expression in oligodendrocytes and prolongs lifespan in female poly-GA C9orf72 mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Oren Amsalem & Hidehiko Inagaki & Jianing Yu & Karel Svoboda & Ran Darshan, 2024. "Sub-threshold neuronal activity and the dynamical regime of cerebral cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Matthew Rosenblatt & Link Tejavibulya & Rongtao Jiang & Stephanie Noble & Dustin Scheinost, 2024. "Data leakage inflates prediction performance in connectome-based machine learning models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Sayedali Shetab Boushehri & Katharina Essig & Nikolaos-Kosmas Chlis & Sylvia Herter & Marina Bacac & Fabian J. Theis & Elke Glasmacher & Carsten Marr & Fabian Schmich, 2023. "Explainable machine learning for profiling the immunological synapse and functional characterization of therapeutic antibodies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Venkat Ram Reddy Ganuthula & Krishna Kumar Balaraman & Nimish Vohra, 2025. "Hedonic Adaptation in the Age of AI: A Perspective on Diminishing Satisfaction Returns in Technology Adoption," Papers 2503.08074, arXiv.org.
    13. Khaled Akkad & David He, 2023. "A dynamic mode decomposition based deep learning technique for prognostics," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 2207-2224, June.
    14. Romain Fournier & Zoi Tsangalidou & David Reich & Pier Francesco Palamara, 2023. "Haplotype-based inference of recent effective population size in modern and ancient DNA samples," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Ji, Li-Qun, 2015. "An assessment of agricultural residue resources for liquid biofuel production in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 561-575.
    16. Matt C. J. Denton & Luke D. Smith & Wenhao Xu & Jodeci Pugsley & Amelia Toghill & Daniel R. Kattnig, 2024. "Magnetosensitivity of tightly bound radical pairs in cryptochrome is enabled by the quantum Zeno effect," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Laura Portell & Sergi Morera & Helena Ramalhinho, 2022. "Door-to-Door Transportation Services for Reduced Mobility Population: A Descriptive Analytics of the City of Barcelona," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-20, April.
    18. Caroline Haimerl & Douglas A. Ruff & Marlene R. Cohen & Cristina Savin & Eero P. Simoncelli, 2023. "Targeted V1 comodulation supports task-adaptive sensory decisions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Wu, Jy S. & Tseng, Hui-Kuan & Liu, Xiaoshuai, 2022. "Techno-economic assessment of bioenergy potential on marginal croplands in the U.S. southeast," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    20. Mite Mijalkov & Ludvig Storm & Blanca Zufiria-Gerbolés & Dániel Veréb & Zhilei Xu & Anna Canal-Garcia & Jiawei Sun & Yu-Wei Chang & Hang Zhao & Emiliano Gómez-Ruiz & Massimiliano Passaretti & Sara Gar, 2025. "Computational memory capacity predicts aging and cognitive decline," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:4168-:d:1149949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.