IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i4p1544-d753522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Migration Behaviors of As, Se and Pb in Ultra-Low-Emission Coal-Fired Units and Effect of Co-Firing Sewage Sludge in CFB Boilers

Author

Listed:
  • Xuan Liu

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Emission Surveillance and Control for Thermal Power Generation, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Yang Teng

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Emission Surveillance and Control for Thermal Power Generation, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Kai Zhang

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Emission Surveillance and Control for Thermal Power Generation, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
    Key Laboratory of Power Station Energy Transfer Conversion and System, North China Electric Power University, Ministry of Education, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

The migration behaviors of As, Se and Pb in ultra-low-emission coal-fired units were investigated and the effect of co-firing of sewage sludge and coal was explored in circulating fluidized-bed (CFB) boiler units. Samples of feed fuel including coal and sewage sludge, fly ash, bottom slag and desulfurization slurry were collected from five CFB units with a capacity between 150 MW and 350 MW and two pulverized coal boiler (PC) units with a capacity of 350 MW and 600 MW. The majority of As, Se and Pb in coal is released during coal combustion and enriched in fly ash. As, Se and Pb in fly ash and bottom slag are associated with inorganic matter, of which As, Se and Pb associated with silicates and aluminosilicates account for more than 60%. In the wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) unit, more than half of the As, Se and Pb migrates to the solid fraction and the concentrations of As, Se and Pb in fine solid particles are much higher than those in coarse solid particles and the liquid fraction. The proportions of exchangeable As, Se and Pb or associated with organic matter in gypsum are higher than those of fly ash and bottom slag. According to the two studied CFB units with blending ratios of sewage sludge below 10%, co-firing with sewage sludge has little effect on the migration and transformation characteristics of As, Se and Pb. Under a long-term acidic leaching environment, Pb in combustion by-products is in the range of low risk, while As and Se are in the range of medium risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuan Liu & Yang Teng & Kai Zhang, 2022. "Migration Behaviors of As, Se and Pb in Ultra-Low-Emission Coal-Fired Units and Effect of Co-Firing Sewage Sludge in CFB Boilers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:1544-:d:753522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/4/1544/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/4/1544/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guan-Bang Chen & Samuel Chatelier & Hsien-Tsung Lin & Fang-Hsien Wu & Ta-Hui Lin, 2018. "A Study of Sewage Sludge Co-Combustion with Australian Black Coal and Shiitake Substrate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Marta Marczak-Grzesik & Piotr Piersa & Mateusz Karczewski & Szymon Szufa & Hilal Ünyay & Aleksandra Kędzierska-Sar & Piotr Bochenek, 2021. "Modified Fly Ash-Based Adsorbents (MFA) for Mercury and Carbon Dioxide Removal from Coal-Fired Flue Gases," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Yinjiao Su & Xuan Liu & Yang Teng & Kai Zhang, 2021. "Mercury Speciation in Various Coals Based on Sequential Chemical Extraction and Thermal Analysis Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Yang, Hang & Zhang, Yongxin & Zheng, Chenghang & Wu, Xuecheng & Chen, Linghong & Fu, Joshua S. & Gao, Xiang, 2018. "Cost estimate of the multi-pollutant abatement in coal-fired power sector in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 523-535.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lizheng Zhao & Yanfei Du & Yusen Zeng & Zhizhong Kang & Baomin Sun, 2020. "Sulfur Conversion of Mixed Coal and Gangue during Combustion in a CFB Boiler," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Valentyna Kukharets & Dalia Juočiūnienė & Taras Hutsol & Olena Sukmaniuk & Jonas Čėsna & Savelii Kukharets & Piotr Piersa & Szymon Szufa & Iryna Horetska & Alona Shevtsova, 2023. "An Algorithm for Managerial Actions on the Rational Use of Renewable Sources of Energy: Determination of the Energy Potential of Biomass in Lithuania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Ricardo N. Coimbra & Carla Escapa & Marta Otero, 2019. "Comparative Thermogravimetric Assessment on the Combustion of Coal, Microalgae Biomass and Their Blend," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Laifu Zhao & Qian Du & Jianmin Gao & Shaohua Wu, 2019. "Contribution of Minerals in Different Occurrence Forms to PM 10 Emissions during the Combustion of Pulverized Zhundong Coal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Andrzej Greinert & Maria Mrówczyńska & Wojciech Szefner, 2019. "The Use of Waste Biomass from the Wood Industry and Municipal Sources for Energy Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Edyta Wrzesińska-Jędrusiak & Michał Czarnecki & Paweł Kazimierski & Paulina Bandrów & Szymon Szufa, 2023. "The Circular Economy in the Management of Waste from Leather Processing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Izabella Maj & Krzysztof Matus, 2023. "Aluminosilicate Clay Minerals: Kaolin, Bentonite, and Halloysite as Fuel Additives for Thermal Conversion of Biomass and Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Timur Valiullin & Ksenia Vershinina & Pavel Strizhak, 2019. "Ignition of Slurry Fuel Droplets with Different Heating Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Wu, Jianxin & Ma, Chunbo & Tang, Kai, 2019. "The static and dynamic heterogeneity and determinants of marginal abatement cost of CO2 emissions in Chinese cities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 685-694.
    10. Tang, Chang & Qi, Yu & Khan, Naqib Ullah & Tang, Ruwei & Xue, Yan, 2023. "Ultra-low emission standards and corporate production performance: Evidence from Chinese thermal power companies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    11. Bei Gao & Zuoren Sun, 2023. "Marginal CO 2 and SO 2 Abatement Costs and Determinants of Coal-Fired Power Plants in China: Considering a Two-Stage Production System with Different Emission Reduction Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-26, April.
    12. Kong, Biao & Wang, Enyuan & Lu, Wei & Li, Zenghua, 2019. "Application of electromagnetic radiation detection in high-temperature anomalous areas experiencing coalfield fires," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. Garikai T. Marangwanda & Daniel M. Madyira & Patrick G. Ndungu & Chido H. Chihobo, 2021. "Combustion Characterisation of Bituminous Coal and Pinus Sawdust Blends by Use of Thermo-Gravimetric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Zhao, Jingyu & Zhang, Yongli & Song, Jiajia & Guo, Tao & Deng, Jun & Shu, Chi-Min, 2023. "Oxygen distribution and gaseous products change of coal fire based upon the semi-enclosed experimental system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    15. Jumoke Oladejo & Kaiqi Shi & Xiang Luo & Gang Yang & Tao Wu, 2018. "A Review of Sludge-to-Energy Recovery Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-38, December.
    16. Małgorzata Wzorek, 2020. "Evaluating the Potential for Combustion of Biofuels in Grate Furnaces," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Yinjiao Su & Xuan Liu & Yang Teng & Kai Zhang, 2021. "A Preliminary Study on Dependence of Mercury Distribution on the Degree of Coalification in Ningwu Coalfield, Shanxi, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    18. Huang, Youxing & Xu, Qi & Zhao, Yanping, 2021. "Short-run pain, long-run gain: Desulfurization investment and productivity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:1544-:d:753522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.