IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i22p8343-d966693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Lean Blowout Prediction Techniques in Lean Premixed Gas Turbine: An Overview

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulrahman Abdullah Bahashwan

    (Department of Electrical and Electronics, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia)

  • Rosdiazli Bin Ibrahim

    (Department of Electrical and Electronics, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia)

  • Madiah Binti Omar

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia)

  • Mochammad Faqih

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia)

Abstract

The lean blowout is the most critical issue in lean premixed gas turbine combustion. Decades of research into LBO prediction methods have yielded promising results. Predictions can be classified into five categories based on methodology: semi-empirical model, numerical simulation, hybrid, experimental, and data-driven model. First is the semi-empirical model, which is the initial model used for LBO limit prediction at the design stages. An example is Lefebvre’s LBO model that could estimate the LBO limit for eight different gas turbine combustors with a ±30% uncertainty. To further develop the prediction of the LBO limit, a second method based on numerical simulation was proposed, which provided deeper information and improved the accuracy of the LBO limit. The numerical prediction method outperformed the semi-empirical model on a specific gas turbine with ±15% uncertainty, but more testing is required on other combustors. Then, scientists proposed a hybrid method to obtain the best out of the earlier models and managed to improve the prediction to ±10% uncertainty. Later, the laboratory-scale combustors were used to study LBO phenomena further and provide more information using the flame characteristics. Because the actual gas turbine is highly complex, all previous methods suffer from simplistic representation. On the other hand, the data-driven prediction methods showed better accuracy and replica using a real dataset from a gas turbine log file. This method has demonstrated 99% accuracy in predicting LBO using artificial intelligence techniques. It could provide critical information for LBO limits prediction at the design stages. However, more research is required on data-driven methods to achieve robust prediction accuracy on various lean premixed combustors.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulrahman Abdullah Bahashwan & Rosdiazli Bin Ibrahim & Madiah Binti Omar & Mochammad Faqih, 2022. "The Lean Blowout Prediction Techniques in Lean Premixed Gas Turbine: An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8343-:d:966693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/22/8343/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/22/8343/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raul-Cristian Roman & Radu-Emil Precup & Emil M. Petriu & Florin Dragan, 2019. "Combination of Data-Driven Active Disturbance Rejection and Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Control with Experimental Validation on Tower Crane Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Tahan, Mohammadreza & Tsoutsanis, Elias & Muhammad, Masdi & Abdul Karim, Z.A., 2017. "Performance-based health monitoring, diagnostics and prognostics for condition-based maintenance of gas turbines: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 122-144.
    3. Maria Grazia De Giorgi & Stefano Campilongo & Antonio Ficarella & Gianluigi De Falco & Mario Commodo & Andrea D’Anna, 2017. "Pollutant Formation during the Occurrence of Flame Instabilities under Very-Lean Combustion Conditions in a Liquid-Fuel Burner," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Tsoutsanis, Elias & Meskin, Nader & Benammar, Mohieddine & Khorasani, Khashayar, 2016. "A dynamic prognosis scheme for flexible operation of gas turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 686-701.
    5. Deng, Banglin & Li, Qing & Chen, Yangyang & Li, Meng & Liu, Aodong & Ran, Jiaqi & Xu, Ying & Liu, Xiaoqiang & Fu, Jianqin & Feng, Renhua, 2019. "The effect of air/fuel ratio on the CO and NOx emissions for a twin-spark motorcycle gasoline engine under wide range of operating conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1202-1213.
    6. Mao Li & Yiheng Tong & Marcus Thern & Jens Klingmann, 2017. "Influence of the Steam Addition on Premixed Methane Air Combustion at Atmospheric Pressure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Akhtar, Saad & Piffaretti, Stefano & Shamim, Tariq, 2018. "Numerical investigation of flame structure and blowout limit for lean premixed turbulent methane-air flames under high pressure conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 21-32.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kiaee, Mehrdad & Tousi, A.M., 2021. "Vector-based deterioration index for gas turbine gas-path prognostics modeling framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Chen, Yu-Zhi & Tsoutsanis, Elias & Xiang, Heng-Chao & Li, Yi-Guang & Zhao, Jun-Jie, 2022. "A dynamic performance diagnostic method applied to hydrogen powered aero engines operating under transient conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    3. Kang, Do Won & Kim, Tong Seop, 2018. "Model-based performance diagnostics of heavy-duty gas turbines using compressor map adaptation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1345-1359.
    4. Zagorowska, Marta & Schulze Spüntrup, Frederik & Ditlefsen, Arne-Marius & Imsland, Lars & Lunde, Erling & Thornhill, Nina F., 2020. "Adaptive detection and prediction of performance degradation in off-shore turbomachinery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    5. Chen, Yu-Zhi & Tsoutsanis, Elias & Wang, Chen & Gou, Lin-Feng, 2023. "A time-series turbofan engine successive fault diagnosis under both steady-state and dynamic conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    6. Akhtar, Saad & Piffaretti, Stefano & Shamim, Tariq, 2018. "Numerical investigation of flame structure and blowout limit for lean premixed turbulent methane-air flames under high pressure conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 21-32.
    7. Chen, Yu-Zhi & Zhao, Xu-Dong & Xiang, Heng-Chao & Tsoutsanis, Elias, 2021. "A sequential model-based approach for gas turbine performance diagnostics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    8. Mingliang Bai & Jinfu Liu & Yujia Ma & Xinyu Zhao & Zhenhua Long & Daren Yu, 2020. "Long Short-Term Memory Network-Based Normal Pattern Group for Fault Detection of Three-Shaft Marine Gas Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Feng Lu & Jipeng Jiang & Jinquan Huang & Xiaojie Qiu, 2018. "An Iterative Reduced KPCA Hidden Markov Model for Gas Turbine Performance Fault Diagnosis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Zhou, Dengji & Yao, Qinbo & Wu, Hang & Ma, Shixi & Zhang, Huisheng, 2020. "Fault diagnosis of gas turbine based on partly interpretable convolutional neural networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    11. Yunpeng Cao & Xinran Lv & Guodong Han & Junqi Luan & Shuying Li, 2019. "Research on Gas-Path Fault-Diagnosis Method of Marine Gas Turbine Based on Exergy Loss and Probabilistic Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Xin Li & Fengrong Bi & Lipeng Zhang & Xiao Yang & Guichang Zhang, 2022. "An Engine Fault Detection Method Based on the Deep Echo State Network and Improved Multi-Verse Optimizer," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Duan, Xiongbo & Feng, Lining & Liu, Haibo & Jiang, Pengfei & Chen, Chao & Sun, Zhiqiang, 2023. "Experimental investigation on exhaust emissions of a heavy-duty vehicle powered by a methanol-fuelled spark ignition engine under world Harmonized Transient Cycle and actual on-road driving conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    14. Kiki Ayu & Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo, 2020. "A Holistic Framework for Supporting Maintenance and Asset Management Life Cycle Decisions for Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-32, April.
    15. Cheng, Xianda & Zheng, Haoran & Yang, Qian & Zheng, Peiying & Dong, Wei, 2023. "Surrogate model-based real-time gas path fault diagnosis for gas turbines under transient conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    16. Jinfu Liu & Zhenhua Long & Mingliang Bai & Linhai Zhu & Daren Yu, 2021. "A Comparative Study on Fault Detection Methods for Gas Turbine Combustion Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-31, January.
    17. Kumar, Anil & Parkash, Chander & Vashishtha, Govind & Tang, Hesheng & Kundu, Pradeep & Xiang, Jiawei, 2022. "State-space modeling and novel entropy-based health indicator for dynamic degradation monitoring of rolling element bearing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    18. Seokho Moon & Hansam Cho & Eunji Koh & Yong Sung Cho & Hyoung Lok Oh & Younghoon Kim & Seoung Bum Kim, 2022. "Remanufacturing Decision-Making for Gas Insulated Switchgear with Remaining Useful Life Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
    19. Catapano, Francesco & Di Iorio, Silvana & Magno, Agnese & Vaglieco, Bianca Maria, 2022. "Effect of fuel quality on combustion evolution and particle emissions from PFI and GDI engines fueled with gasoline, ethanol and blend, with focus on 10–23 nm particles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    20. Zhu, Yunlong & Dong, Zhe & Cheng, Zhonghua & Huang, Xiaojin & Dong, Yujie & Zhang, Zuoyi, 2023. "Neural network extended state-observer for energy system monitoring," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8343-:d:966693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.