IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i20p7726-d947185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synergetic Effect of Non-Condensable Gas and Steam Quality on the Production Capacity of Geothermal Wells and Geothermal Power Generation for Hot Dry Rock

Author

Listed:
  • Tailu Li

    (School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China)

  • Ruizhao Gao

    (School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China)

  • Xiang Gao

    (School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China)

  • Qinghua Liu

    (China Electronics System Engineering NO.2 Construction Co., Ltd., Wuxi 214111, China)

Abstract

This paper aims to fill the research gap on the effect of steam quality and non-condensable gas on heat-carrying fluid productivity, system performance and optimization. First, the effect of the temperature and quality of the heat-carrying fluid and non-condensable gas (NCG) content on the production parameters was evaluated. After that, three energy conversion systems which included a single flash (SF) system, an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system and a single flash combined ORC (SFORC) system were constructed in this paper to utilize the heat-carrying two-phase flow with non-condensable gas. Finally, based on thermodynamic modeling, the effects of the temperature and quality of the heat-carrying fluid and non-condensable gas content on the performance and optimization of the three power conversion systems were investigated. The results show that single-phase heat-carrying fluids are more productive than two-phase heat-carrying fluids. NCG is always detrimental. The heat-carrying fluid temperature and quality are positively correlated with system efficiency and negatively correlated with the net power output. In the comparison of comprehensive performances, the SFORC system is the better, and the ORC system and the SF system are the worse. The optimal net power output of the SF system, the ORC system and the SFORC system is 4883 kW, 6557 kW and 7251 kW, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Tailu Li & Ruizhao Gao & Xiang Gao & Qinghua Liu, 2022. "Synergetic Effect of Non-Condensable Gas and Steam Quality on the Production Capacity of Geothermal Wells and Geothermal Power Generation for Hot Dry Rock," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-29, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7726-:d:947185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7726/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7726/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Yongzhen & Li, Chengjun & Zhao, Jun & Wu, Boyuan & Du, Yanping & Zhang, Jing & Zhu, Yilin, 2021. "The above-ground strategies to approach the goal of geothermal power generation in China: State of art and future researches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Saleh, Bahaa & Koglbauer, Gerald & Wendland, Martin & Fischer, Johann, 2007. "Working fluids for low-temperature organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1210-1221.
    3. Lu, Shyi-Min, 2018. "A global review of enhanced geothermal system (EGS)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2902-2921.
    4. Li, Huashan & Cao, Fei & Bu, Xianbiao & Wang, Lingbao & Wang, Xianlong, 2014. "Performance characteristics of R1234yf ejector-expansion refrigeration cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 96-103.
    5. Dawo, Fabian & Fleischmann, Jonas & Kaufmann, Florian & Schifflechner, Christopher & Eyerer, Sebastian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2021. "R1224yd(Z), R1233zd(E) and R1336mzz(Z) as replacements for R245fa: Experimental performance, interaction with lubricants and environmental impact," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    6. Hung, T.C. & Wang, S.K. & Kuo, C.H. & Pei, B.S. & Tsai, K.F., 2010. "A study of organic working fluids on system efficiency of an ORC using low-grade energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1403-1411.
    7. Chen, Chaofan & Witte, Francesco & Tuschy, Ilja & Kolditz, Olaf & Shao, Haibing, 2022. "Parametric optimization and comparative study of an organic Rankine cycle power plant for two-phase geothermal sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    8. Li, Tailu & Zhang, Zhigang & Lu, Jian & Yang, Junlan & Hu, Yujie, 2015. "Two-stage evaporation strategy to improve system performance for organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 323-334.
    9. Abdolalipouradl, Mehran & Mohammadkhani, Farzad & Khalilarya, Shahram, 2020. "A comparative analysis of novel combined flash-binary cycles for Sabalan geothermal wells: Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic viewpoints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    10. Meng, Nan & Li, Tailu & Wang, Jianqiang & Jia, Yanan & Liu, Qinghua & Qin, Haosen, 2020. "Synergetic mechanism of fracture properties and system configuration on techno-economic performance of enhanced geothermal system for power generation during life cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 910-924.
    11. Ayachi, Fadhel & Boulawz Ksayer, Elias & Zoughaib, Assaad & Neveu, Pierre, 2014. "ORC optimization for medium grade heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 47-56.
    12. Shamoushaki, Moein & Fiaschi, Daniele & Manfrida, Giampaolo & Talluri, Lorenzo, 2022. "Energy, exergy, economic and environmental (4E) analyses of a geothermal power plant with NCGs reinjection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    13. Pambudi, Nugroho Agung & Itoi, Ryuichi & Jalilinasrabady, Saeid & Jaelani, Khasani, 2015. "Performance improvement of a single-flash geothermal power plant in Dieng, Indonesia, upon conversion to a double-flash system using thermodynamic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 424-431.
    14. Lacirignola, Martino & Blanc, Isabelle, 2013. "Environmental analysis of practical design options for enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) through life-cycle assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 901-914.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kazemi, Shabnam & Nor, Mohamad Iskandr Mohamad & Teoh, Wen Hui, 2020. "Thermodynamic and economic investigation of an ionic liquid as a new proposed geothermal fluid in different organic Rankine cycles for energy production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Gkousis, Spiros & Welkenhuysen, Kris & Compernolle, Tine, 2022. "Deep geothermal energy extraction, a review on environmental hotspots with focus on geo-technical site conditions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2015. "Thermodynamic and economic performances optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system utilizing exhaust gas of a large marine diesel engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1-12.
    4. Vélez, Fredy & Segovia, José J. & Martín, M. Carmen & Antolín, Gregorio & Chejne, Farid & Quijano, Ana, 2012. "A technical, economical and market review of organic Rankine cycles for the conversion of low-grade heat for power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4175-4189.
    5. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    6. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Insights into geothermal utilization of abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 44-60.
    7. Li, Chengyu & Wang, Huaixin, 2016. "Power cycles for waste heat recovery from medium to high temperature flue gas sources – from a view of thermodynamic optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 707-721.
    8. Ge, Zhong & Wang, Hua & Wang, Hui-Tao & Wang, Jian-Jun & Li, Ming & Wu, Fu-Zhong & Zhang, Song-Yuan, 2015. "Main parameters optimization of regenerative organic Rankine cycle driven by low-temperature flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1886-1895.
    9. Sun, Fengrui & Yao, Yuedong & Li, Guozhen & Li, Xiangfang, 2018. "Geothermal energy extraction in CO2 rich basin using abandoned horizontal wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 760-773.
    10. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Schampheleire, S. & De Paepe, M., 2013. "Part load based thermo-economic optimization of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) applied to a combined heat and power (CHP) system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 871-881.
    11. Domingues, António & Santos, Helder & Costa, Mário, 2013. "Analysis of vehicle exhaust waste heat recovery potential using a Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 71-85.
    12. Satanphol, K. & Pridasawas, W. & Suphanit, B., 2017. "A study on optimal composition of zeotropic working fluid in an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for low grade heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 326-339.
    13. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    14. Pezzuolo, Alex & Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna & Mirandola, Alberto, 2016. "The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 605-620.
    15. Guo, T. & Wang, H.X. & Zhang, S.J., 2011. "Fluids and parameters optimization for a novel cogeneration system driven by low-temperature geothermal sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2639-2649.
    16. Wang, E.H. & Zhang, H.G. & Zhao, Y. & Fan, B.Y. & Wu, Y.T. & Mu, Q.H., 2012. "Performance analysis of a novel system combining a dual loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) with a gasoline engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 385-395.
    17. Calise, Francesco & Macaluso, Adriano & Piacentino, Antonio & Vanoli, Laura, 2017. "A novel hybrid polygeneration system supplying energy and desalinated water by renewable sources in Pantelleria Island," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1086-1106.
    18. Liu, Chao & He, Chao & Gao, Hong & Xie, Hui & Li, Yourong & Wu, Shuangying & Xu, Jinliang, 2013. "The environmental impact of organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery through life-cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 144-154.
    19. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    20. Roy, J.P. & Misra, Ashok, 2012. "Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle using R-123 for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 227-235.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7726-:d:947185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.