IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i18p6584-d910367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Twins for Real-Time Scenario Analysis during Well Construction Operations

Author

Listed:
  • Gurtej Singh Saini

    (Cockrell School of Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

  • AmirHossein Fallah

    (Cockrell School of Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

  • Pradeepkumar Ashok

    (Cockrell School of Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

  • Eric van Oort

    (Cockrell School of Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

Abstract

Well construction is a complex multi-step process that requires decision-making at every step. These decisions, currently made by humans, are inadvertently influenced by past experiences and human factor issues, such as the situational awareness of the decision-maker. This human bias often results in operational inefficiencies or safety and environmental issues. While there are approaches and tools to monitor well construction operations, there are none that evaluate potential action sequences and scenarios and select the best possible sequence of actions. This paper defines a generalized iterative methodology for setting up a digital twin to address this shortcoming. Depending on its application, the objectives and constraints around the twin are formulated. The digital twin is then built using a cyclical process of defining the required outputs, identifying and integrating the necessary process models, and aggregating the required data streams. The twin is set up such that it is predictive in nature, thus enabling scenario analysis. The method is demonstrated here by setting up twinning systems for two different categories of problems. First, an integrated multi-model twin to replicate borehole cleaning operations for stuck-pipe prevention is developed and tested. Second, the creation, implementation, and testing of a twinning system for assisting with operational planning and logistics is demonstrated by considering the time it takes to drill a well to total depth (TD). These twins are also used to simulate multiple future scenarios to quantify the effects of different actions on eventual outcomes. Such systems can help improve operational performance by allowing more informed human, as well as automated, decision-making. Development of a system for well construction operations that integrates multiple sources of information with process and equipment models to quantify the system state and analyzes different scenarios by evaluating action sequences is a novel contribution of this paper. The approach presented here can be applied to the construction of digital twins for any well construction operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gurtej Singh Saini & AmirHossein Fallah & Pradeepkumar Ashok & Eric van Oort, 2022. "Digital Twins for Real-Time Scenario Analysis during Well Construction Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:18:p:6584-:d:910367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/18/6584/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/18/6584/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kendrik Yan Hong Lim & Pai Zheng & Chun-Hsien Chen, 2020. "A state-of-the-art survey of Digital Twin: techniques, engineering product lifecycle management and business innovation perspectives," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1313-1337, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shimin Liu & Pai Zheng & Jinsong Bao, 2024. "Digital Twin-based manufacturing system: a survey based on a novel reference model," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(6), pages 2517-2546, August.
    2. Jiajun Zhou & Liang Gao & Chao Lu & Xifan Yao, 2025. "Collaborative optimization of manufacturing service allocation via multi-task transfer learning evolutionary approach," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 1761-1779, March.
    3. Jielin Chen & Shuang Li & Hanwei Teng & Xiaolong Leng & Changping Li & Rendi Kurniawan & Tae Jo Ko, 2025. "Digital twin-driven real-time suppression of delamination damage in CFRP drilling," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1459-1476, February.
    4. Jyrki Savolainen & Michele Urbani, 2021. "Maintenance optimization for a multi-unit system with digital twin simulation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 1953-1973, October.
    5. Zhicheng Xu & Vignesh Selvaraj & Sangkee Min, 2025. "Intelligent G-code-based power prediction of ultra-precision CNC machine tools through 1DCNN-LSTM-Attention model," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1237-1260, February.
    6. Lan, Lan & Zhou, Zhifang, 2024. "Complementary or substitutive effects? The duality of digitalization and ESG on firm's innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    7. Yanzhi Zhao & Mingsi Zhao & Fengyu Shi, 2024. "Integrating Moral Education and Educational Information Technology: A Strategic Approach to Enhance Rural Teacher Training in Universities," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 15053-15093, September.
    8. Seon Han Choi & Byeong Soo Kim, 2025. "Intelligent factory layout design framework through collaboration between optimization, simulation, and digital twin," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 1547-1561, March.
    9. Elisa Negri & Vibhor Pandhare & Laura Cattaneo & Jaskaran Singh & Marco Macchi & Jay Lee, 2021. "Field-synchronized Digital Twin framework for production scheduling with uncertainty," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1207-1228, April.
    10. Remigiusz Iwańkowicz & Radosław Rutkowski, 2023. "Digital Twin of Shipbuilding Process in Shipyard 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, June.
    11. Fuwen Hu & Xianjin Qiu & Guoye Jing & Jian Tang & Yuanzhi Zhu, 2023. "Digital twin-based decision making paradigm of raise boring method," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 2387-2405, June.
    12. Saporiti, Nicolò & Cannas, Violetta Giada & Pozzi, Rossella & Rossi, Tommaso, 2023. "Challenges and countermeasures for digital twin implementation in manufacturing plants: A Delphi study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    13. Leung, Eric K.H. & Lee, Carmen Kar Hang & Ouyang, Zhiyuan, 2022. "From traditional warehouses to Physical Internet hubs: A digital twin-based inbound synchronization framework for PI-order management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    14. SungKu Kang & Ran Jin & Xinwei Deng & Ron S. Kenett, 2023. "Challenges of modeling and analysis in cybermanufacturing: a review from a machine learning and computation perspective," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 415-428, February.
    15. Madalina CUC, 2021. "Improving The Decision-Making Process By Modeling Digital Twins In A Big Data Environment," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 138-154, May.
    16. Fromhold-Eisebith, Martina & Marschall, Philip & Peters, Robert & Thomes, Paul, 2021. "Torn between digitized future and context dependent past – How implementing ‘Industry 4.0’ production technologies could transform the German textile industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    17. Angelo Corallo & Vito Del Vecchio & Marianna Lezzi & Paola Morciano, 2021. "Shop Floor Digital Twin in Smart Manufacturing: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Luis M. Camarinha-Matos & Andre Dionisio Rocha & Paula Graça, 2024. "Collaborative approaches in sustainable and resilient manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 499-519, February.
    19. Weifei Hu & Jinyi Shao & Qing Jiao & Chuxuan Wang & Jin Cheng & Zhenyu Liu & Jianrong Tan, 2023. "A new differentiable architecture search method for optimizing convolutional neural networks in the digital twin of intelligent robotic grasping," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(7), pages 2943-2961, October.
    20. Georgios Falekas & Athanasios Karlis, 2021. "Digital Twin in Electrical Machine Control and Predictive Maintenance: State-of-the-Art and Future Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:18:p:6584-:d:910367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.