IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9733-d1173843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Twin of Shipbuilding Process in Shipyard 4.0

Author

Listed:
  • Remigiusz Iwańkowicz

    (Faculty of Economics and Transport Engineering, Maritime University of Szczecin, 70-500 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Radosław Rutkowski

    (Faculty of Economics and Transport Engineering, Maritime University of Szczecin, 70-500 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

Maximum digitalization is the current trend in industrial development. The digital industrial revolution has been underway for more than a dozen years. Industry 4.0 and the idea of digital twins (DT) are becoming the focus of virtually all industrial sectors. Some sectors are more predisposed to digitalization, while for others, the process is much more difficult. This mainly depends on the specific characteristics and susceptibility of a given industry, including the current degree of digitalization of companies, as well as the knowledge and mental readiness of employees. The individual characteristics of an industry are important. Shipbuilding is a traditional industry where the level of digitalization is still low. As a result, the efficiency of shipbuilding processes and the quality of ships built are not sufficiently controlled. The article addresses this problem, reviews work in the field of digitalization of shipbuilding processes, and identifies the needs and challenges in this area. The article proposes the concept of a DT system for the entire ship design and production process. Key areas of digitalization of the actual processes were defined, and a division was made into planning, monitoring, and process analysis activities. Special attention was paid to the area of dimensional quality control, and the dimensional quality management metasystem (DQMM) was introduced into the comprehensive DT system. The requirements were defined, and the limitations of the proposed solution were identified, taking into account a number of external factors, including the degree of readiness of the manufacturer—the shipyard. The developed DT system concept was tested using the example of the construction process of a simplified ship. Practical aspects of the implementation of the proposed solution, in particular, DQMM, were pointed out.

Suggested Citation

  • Remigiusz Iwańkowicz & Radosław Rutkowski, 2023. "Digital Twin of Shipbuilding Process in Shipyard 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9733-:d:1173843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9733/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9733/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kendrik Yan Hong Lim & Pai Zheng & Chun-Hsien Chen, 2020. "A state-of-the-art survey of Digital Twin: techniques, engineering product lifecycle management and business innovation perspectives," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1313-1337, August.
    2. Matthew Callcut & Jean-Paul Cerceau Agliozzo & Liz Varga & Lauren McMillan, 2021. "Digital Twins in Civil Infrastructure Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-32, October.
    3. Ahmed Saad & Samy Faddel & Osama Mohammed, 2020. "IoT-Based Digital Twin for Energy Cyber-Physical Systems: Design and Implementation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Anne H. Gausdal & Karen V. Czachorowski & Marina Z. Solesvik, 2018. "Applying Blockchain Technology: Evidence from Norwegian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    5. João Vieira & João Poças Martins & Nuno Marques de Almeida & Hugo Patrício & João Gomes Morgado, 2022. "Towards Resilient and Sustainable Rail and Road Networks: A Systematic Literature Review on Digital Twins," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. João Vieira & João Poças Martins & Nuno Marques de Almeida & Hugo Patrício & João Gomes Morgado, 2022. "Towards Resilient and Sustainable Rail and Road Networks: A Systematic Literature Review on Digital Twins," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Hossein Omrany & Karam M. Al-Obaidi & Amreen Husain & Amirhosein Ghaffarianhoseini, 2023. "Digital Twins in the Construction Industry: A Comprehensive Review of Current Implementations, Enabling Technologies, and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    3. Yubo Guo & Chuan Chen & Xiaowei Luo & Igor Martek, 2025. "Critical drivers and barriers of digital twin adoption in water infrastructure: An environmental, social, governance, and financial perspective," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 1623-1648, April.
    4. Jyrki Savolainen & Michele Urbani, 2021. "Maintenance optimization for a multi-unit system with digital twin simulation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 1953-1973, October.
    5. Archana Saxena & Rajesh Singh & Anita Gehlot & Shaik Vaseem Akram & Bhekisipho Twala & Aman Singh & Elisabeth Caro Montero & Neeraj Priyadarshi, 2022. "Technologies Empowered Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): An Industry 4.0 Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Dutta, Pankaj & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Somani, Surabhi & Butala, Richa, 2020. "Blockchain technology in supply chain operations: Applications, challenges and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    7. Seon Han Choi & Byeong Soo Kim, 2025. "Intelligent factory layout design framework through collaboration between optimization, simulation, and digital twin," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 1547-1561, March.
    8. Justyna Smagowicz & Cezary Szwed & Dawid Dąbal & Pavel Scholz, 2022. "A Simulation Model of Power Demand Management by Manufacturing Enterprises under the Conditions of Energy Sector Transformation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-27, April.
    9. Saporiti, Nicolò & Cannas, Violetta Giada & Pozzi, Rossella & Rossi, Tommaso, 2023. "Challenges and countermeasures for digital twin implementation in manufacturing plants: A Delphi study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    10. Issam A. R. Moghrabi & Sameer Ahmad Bhat & Piotr Szczuko & Rawan A. AlKhaled & Muneer Ahmad Dar, 2023. "Digital Transformation and Its Influence on Sustainable Manufacturing and Business Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-35, February.
    11. Edvard Tijan & Adrijana Agatić & Marija Jović & Saša Aksentijević, 2019. "Maritime National Single Window—A Prerequisite for Sustainable Seaport Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Casey R. Corrado & Suzanne M. DeLong & Emily G. Holt & Edward Y. Hua & Andreas Tolk, 2022. "Combining Green Metrics and Digital Twins for Sustainability Planning and Governance of Smart Buildings and Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    13. Guoliang Shi & Zhansheng Liu & Dengzhou Xian & Rongtian Zhang, 2023. "Intelligent Assessment Method of Structural Reliability Driven by Carrying Capacity Sustainable Target: Taking Bearing Capacity as Criterion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Fromhold-Eisebith, Martina & Marschall, Philip & Peters, Robert & Thomes, Paul, 2021. "Torn between digitized future and context dependent past – How implementing ‘Industry 4.0’ production technologies could transform the German textile industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    15. Sharma, Mahak & Sehrawat, Rajat & Daim, Tugrul & Shaygan, Amir, 2021. "Technology assessment: Enabling Blockchain in hospitality and tourism sectors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    16. Xue Li & Kum Fai Yuen, 2022. "Autonomous ships: A study of critical success factors," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(2), pages 228-254, June.
    17. Giulia Pellegrino & Massimiliano Gervasi & Mario Angelelli & Angelo Corallo, 2025. "A Conceptual Framework for Digital Twin in Healthcare: Evidence from a Systematic Meta-Review," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 7-32, February.
    18. Angelo Corallo & Vito Del Vecchio & Marianna Lezzi & Paola Morciano, 2021. "Shop Floor Digital Twin in Smart Manufacturing: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, November.
    19. Weifei Hu & Jinyi Shao & Qing Jiao & Chuxuan Wang & Jin Cheng & Zhenyu Liu & Jianrong Tan, 2023. "A new differentiable architecture search method for optimizing convolutional neural networks in the digital twin of intelligent robotic grasping," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(7), pages 2943-2961, October.
    20. Tijan, Edvard & Jović, Marija & Aksentijević, Saša & Pucihar, Andreja, 2021. "Digital transformation in the maritime transport sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9733-:d:1173843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.