IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i15p5640-d879519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Qualitative Strategy for Fusion of Physics into Empirical Models for Process Anomaly Detection

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Y. Al Rashdan

    (Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID 83415, USA)

  • Hany S. Abdel-Khalik

    (School of Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

  • Kellen M. Giraud

    (Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID 83415, USA)

  • Daniel G. Cole

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA)

  • Jacob A. Farber

    (Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID 83415, USA)

  • William W. Clark

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA)

  • Abenezer Alemu

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA)

  • Marcus C. Allen

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA)

  • Ryan M. Spangler

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA)

  • Athi Varuttamaseni

    (Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA)

Abstract

To facilitate the automated online monitoring of power plants, a systematic and qualitative strategy for anomaly detection is presented. This strategy is essential to provide credible reasoning on why and when an empirical versus hybrid (i.e., physics-supported) approach should be used and to determine the ideal mix of these two approaches for a defined anomaly detection scope. Empirical methods are usually based on pattern, statistical, and causal inference. Hybrid methods include the use of physics models to train and test data methods, reduce data dimensionality, reduce data-model complexity, augment data, and reduce empirical uncertainty; hybrid methods also include the use of data to tune physics models. The presented strategy is driven by key decision points related to data relevance, simple modeling feasibility, data inference, physics-modeling value, data dimensionality, physics knowledge, method of validation, performance, data availability, and suitability for training and testing, cause-effect, entropy inference, and model fitting. The strategy is demonstrated through a pilot use case for the application of anomaly detection to capture a valve packing leak at the high-pressure coolant injection system of a nuclear power plant.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Y. Al Rashdan & Hany S. Abdel-Khalik & Kellen M. Giraud & Daniel G. Cole & Jacob A. Farber & William W. Clark & Abenezer Alemu & Marcus C. Allen & Ryan M. Spangler & Athi Varuttamaseni, 2022. "A Qualitative Strategy for Fusion of Physics into Empirical Models for Process Anomaly Detection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5640-:d:879519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5640/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5640/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Hongshan & Liu, Huihai & Hu, Wenjing & Yan, Xihui, 2018. "Anomaly detection and fault analysis of wind turbine components based on deep learning network," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 825-834.
    2. Biagetti, Tatiana & Sciubba, Enrico, 2004. "Automatic diagnostics and prognostics of energy conversion processes via knowledge-based systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 2553-2572.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mingzhu Tang & Wei Chen & Qi Zhao & Huawei Wu & Wen Long & Bin Huang & Lida Liao & Kang Zhang, 2019. "Development of an SVR Model for the Fault Diagnosis of Large-Scale Doubly-Fed Wind Turbines Using SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Feng, Chenlong & Liu, Chao & Jiang, Dongxiang, 2023. "Unsupervised anomaly detection using graph neural networks integrated with physical-statistical feature fusion and local-global learning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 309-323.
    3. Zhang, Chen & Yang, Tao, 2021. "Optimal maintenance planning and resource allocation for wind farms based on non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-ΙΙ," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1540-1549.
    4. Xu, Qifa & Fan, Zhenhua & Jia, Weiyin & Jiang, Cuixia, 2020. "Fault detection of wind turbines via multivariate process monitoring based on vine copulas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 939-955.
    5. Meng Li & Shuangxin Wang, 2019. "Dynamic Fault Monitoring of Pitch System in Wind Turbines using Selective Ensemble Small-World Neural Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Jastrzebska, Agnieszka & Morales Hernández, Alejandro & Nápoles, Gonzalo & Salgueiro, Yamisleydi & Vanhoof, Koen, 2022. "Measuring wind turbine health using fuzzy-concept-based drifting models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 730-740.
    7. Jorge Maldonado-Correa & Sergio Martín-Martínez & Estefanía Artigao & Emilio Gómez-Lázaro, 2020. "Using SCADA Data for Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Matthew Boeding & Kelly Boswell & Michael Hempel & Hamid Sharif & Juan Lopez & Kalyan Perumalla, 2022. "Survey of Cybersecurity Governance, Threats, and Countermeasures for the Power Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Chen, Hansi & Liu, Hang & Chu, Xuening & Liu, Qingxiu & Xue, Deyi, 2021. "Anomaly detection and critical SCADA parameters identification for wind turbines based on LSTM-AE neural network," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 829-840.
    10. Zhang, Chen & Gao, Wei & Yang, Tao & Guo, Sheng, 2019. "Opportunistic maintenance strategy for wind turbines considering weather conditions and spare parts inventory management," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 703-711.
    11. Zhou, Dengji & Zhang, Huisheng & Weng, Shilie, 2014. "A novel prognostic model of performance degradation trend for power machinery maintenance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 740-746.
    12. Konstantina Fotiadou & Terpsichori Helen Velivassaki & Artemis Voulkidis & Dimitrios Skias & Corrado De Santis & Theodore Zahariadis, 2020. "Proactive Critical Energy Infrastructure Protection via Deep Feature Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, May.
    13. Kouadri, Abdelmalek & Hajji, Mansour & Harkat, Mohamed-Faouzi & Abodayeh, Kamaleldin & Mansouri, Majdi & Nounou, Hazem & Nounou, Mohamed, 2020. "Hidden Markov model based principal component analysis for intelligent fault diagnosis of wind energy converter systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 598-606.
    14. Rami Al-Hajj & Ali Assi & Bilel Neji & Raymond Ghandour & Zaher Al Barakeh, 2023. "Transfer Learning for Renewable Energy Systems: A Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-28, June.
    15. Deng, Ziwei & Li, Yuxuan & Zhu, Hongqiu & Huang, Keke & Tang, Zhaohui & Wang, Zhen, 2020. "Sparse stacked autoencoder network for complex system monitoring with industrial applications," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Wang, Anqi & Pei, Yan & Zhu, Yunyi & Qian, Zheng, 2023. "Wind turbine fault detection and identification through self-attention-based mechanism embedded with a multivariable query pattern," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 918-937.
    17. Abdenour Soualhi & Mourad Lamraoui & Bilal Elyousfi & Hubert Razik, 2022. "PHM SURVEY: Implementation of Prognostic Methods for Monitoring Industrial Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    18. Chung, Mo & Park, Hwa-Choon, 2010. "Development of a software package for community energy system assessment – Part I: Building a load estimator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 2767-2776.
    19. Annalisa Santolamazza & Daniele Dadi & Vito Introna, 2021. "A Data-Mining Approach for Wind Turbine Fault Detection Based on SCADA Data Analysis Using Artificial Neural Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, March.
    20. Majdi Mansouri & Khaled Dhibi & Hazem Nounou & Mohamed Nounou, 2022. "An Effective Fault Diagnosis Technique for Wind Energy Conversion Systems Based on an Improved Particle Swarm Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-11, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5640-:d:879519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.