IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i8p2101-d533272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Doppler Lidar Investigations of Wind Turbine Near-Wakes and LES Modeling with New Porous Disc Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Takanori Uchida

    (Research Institute for Applied Mechanics (RIAM), Kyushu University, 6-1 Kasuga-kouen, Kasuga, Fukuoka 816-8580, Japan)

  • Tadasuke Yoshida

    (Wind Power Business Unit, Engineering and Technology Development Department, Hitachi Zosen Corporation, 7-89 Nanko-Kita 1-chome, Suminoe-ku, Osaka 559-8559, Japan)

  • Masaki Inui

    (Wind Power Business Unit, Engineering and Technology Development Department, Hitachi Zosen Corporation, 7-89 Nanko-Kita 1-chome, Suminoe-ku, Osaka 559-8559, Japan)

  • Yoshihiro Taniyama

    (Energy Systems Research and Development Center, Mechanical Engineering R&D Department, Vibration Technology Group, Toshiba Energy Systems & Solutions Corporation, 2-4 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan)

Abstract

Many bottom-mounted offshore wind farms are currently planned for the coastal areas of Japan, in which wind speeds of 6.0–10.0 m/s are extremely common. The impact of such wind speeds is very relevant for the realization of bottom-mounted offshore wind farms. In evaluating the feasibility of these wind farms, therefore, strict evaluation at wind speeds of 6.0–10.0 m/s is important. In the present study, the airflow characteristics of 2 MW-class downwind wind turbine wake flows were first investigated using a vertically profiling remote sensing wind measurement device (lidar). The wind turbines used in this study are installed at the point where the sea is just in front of the wind turbines. A ground-based continuous-wave (CW) conically scanning wind lidar system (“ZephIR ZX300”) was used. Focusing on the wind turbine near-wakes, the detailed behaviors were considered. We found that the influence of the wind turbine wake, that is, the wake loss (wind velocity deficit), is extremely large in the wind speed range of 6.0–10.0 m/s, and that the wake loss was almost constant at such wind speeds (6.0–10.0 m/s). It was additionally shown that these results correspond to the distribution of the thrust coefficient of the wind turbine. We proposed a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) porous disk (PD) wake model as an intermediate method between engineering wake models and CFD wake models. Based on the above observations, the wind speed range for reproducing the behavior of the wind turbine wakes with the CFD PD wake model we developed was set to 6.0–10.0 m/s. Targeting the vertical wind speed distribution in the near-wake region acquired in the “ZephIR ZX300”, we tuned the parameters of the CFD PD wake model (C RC = 2.5). We found that in practice, when evaluating the mean wind velocity deficit due to wind turbine wakes, applying the CFD PD wake model in the wind turbine swept area was very effective. That is, the CFD PD wake model can reproduce the mean average wind speed distribution in the wind turbine swept area.

Suggested Citation

  • Takanori Uchida & Tadasuke Yoshida & Masaki Inui & Yoshihiro Taniyama, 2021. "Doppler Lidar Investigations of Wind Turbine Near-Wakes and LES Modeling with New Porous Disc Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-33, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:2101-:d:533272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/8/2101/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/8/2101/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takanori Uchida & Susumu Takakuwa, 2019. "A Large-Eddy Simulation-Based Assessment of the Risk of Wind Turbine Failures Due to Terrain-Induced Turbulence over a Wind Farm in Complex Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Jonathon Sumner & Christophe Sibuet Watters & Christian Masson, 2010. "CFD in Wind Energy: The Virtual, Multiscale Wind Tunnel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(5), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Takanori Uchida & Yoshihiro Taniyama & Yuki Fukatani & Michiko Nakano & Zhiren Bai & Tadasuke Yoshida & Masaki Inui, 2020. "A New Wind Turbine CFD Modeling Method Based on a Porous Disk Approach for Practical Wind Farm Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
    4. Tetsuya Kogaki & Kenichi Sakurai & Susumu Shimada & Hirokazu Kawabata & Yusuke Otake & Katsutoshi Kondo & Emi Fujita, 2020. "Field Measurements of Wind Characteristics Using LiDAR on a Wind Farm with Downwind Turbines Installed in a Complex Terrain Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Takanori Uchida & Yasushi Kawashima, 2019. "New Assessment Scales for Evaluating the Degree of Risk of Wind Turbine Blade Damage Caused by Terrain-Induced Turbulence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-27, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shibuya, Koichiro & Uchida, Takanori, 2023. "Wake asymmetry of yaw state wind turbines induced by interference with wind towers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    2. Liu, Weiqi & Shi, Jian & Chen, Hailong & Liu, Hengxu & Lin, Zi & Wang, Lingling, 2021. "Lagrangian actuator model for wind turbine wake aerodynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Takanori Uchida, 2020. "Effects of Inflow Shear on Wake Characteristics of Wind-Turbines over Flat Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-31, July.
    2. Takanori Uchida & Kenichiro Sugitani, 2020. "Numerical and Experimental Study of Topographic Speed-Up Effects in Complex Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-38, July.
    3. Takanori Uchida & Susumu Takakuwa, 2020. "Numerical Investigation of Stable Stratification Effects on Wind Resource Assessment in Complex Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-32, December.
    4. Takanori Uchida & Yoshihiro Taniyama & Yuki Fukatani & Michiko Nakano & Zhiren Bai & Tadasuke Yoshida & Masaki Inui, 2020. "A New Wind Turbine CFD Modeling Method Based on a Porous Disk Approach for Practical Wind Farm Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
    5. Takanori Uchida, 2019. "Numerical Investigation of Terrain-Induced Turbulence in Complex Terrain Using High-Resolution Elevation Data and Surface Roughness Data Constructed with a Drone," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Romanic, Djordje & Parvu, Dan & Refan, Maryam & Hangan, Horia, 2018. "Wind and tornado climatologies and wind resource modelling for a modern development situated in “Tornado Alley”," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 97-112.
    7. Hussein A. Mahmood & Nor Mariah. Adam & B. B. Sahari & S. U. Masuri, 2017. "New Design of a CNG-H 2 -AIR Mixer for Internal Combustion Engines: An Experimental and Numerical Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-27, September.
    8. Shaohui Li & Xuejin Sun & Riwei Zhang & Chuanliang Zhang, 2019. "A Feasibility Study of Simulating the Micro-Scale Wind Field for Wind Energy Applications by NWP/CFD Model with Improved Coupling Method and Data Assimilation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Dong Xia & Huiwen Nie & Lei Sun & Jing Wang & Kim-Chiu Chow & Kwing-Lam Chan & Donghai Wang, 2022. "Urbanization Effects on Surface Wind in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area Using a Fan-Sector Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Toja-Silva, Francisco & Lopez-Garcia, Oscar & Peralta, Carlos & Navarro, Jorge & Cruz, Ignacio, 2016. "An empirical–heuristic optimization of the building-roof geometry for urban wind energy exploitation on high-rise buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 769-794.
    11. Takanori Uchida & Yuji Ohya, 2011. "Latest Developments in Numerical Wind Synopsis Prediction Using the RIAM-COMPACT ® CFD Model—Design Wind Speed Evaluation and Wind Risk (Terrain-Induced Turbulence) Diagnostics in Japan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Takanori Uchida & Yasushi Kawashima, 2019. "New Assessment Scales for Evaluating the Degree of Risk of Wind Turbine Blade Damage Caused by Terrain-Induced Turbulence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-27, July.
    13. Wen, Tao & Lu, Lin & He, Weifeng & Min, Yunran, 2020. "Fundamentals and applications of CFD technology on analyzing falling film heat and mass exchangers: A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    14. Thé, Jesse & Yu, Hesheng, 2017. "A critical review on the simulations of wind turbine aerodynamics focusing on hybrid RANS-LES methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 257-289.
    15. Hanslian, David & Hošek, Jiří, 2015. "Combining the VAS 3D interpolation method and Wind Atlas methodology to produce a high-resolution wind resource map for the Czech Republic," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 291-299.
    16. Miguel A. Gómez & Roberto Comesaña & Miguel A. Álvarez Feijoo & Pablo Eguía, 2012. "Simulation of the Effect of Water Temperature on Domestic Biomass Boiler Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Dimitris Al. Katsaprakakis & Nikos Papadakis & Ioannis Ntintakis, 2021. "A Comprehensive Analysis of Wind Turbine Blade Damage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-31, September.
    18. Arteaga-López, Ernesto & Angeles-Camacho, César, 2021. "Innovative virtual computational domain based on wind rose diagrams for micrositing small wind turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    19. J. Gaitan-Aroca & Fabio Sierra & Jose Ulises Castellanos Contreras, 2020. "Bio-Inspired Rotor Design Characterization of a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    20. Sanchez, Valentin & Pallares, Jordi & Vernet, Anton & Agafonova, Oxana & Hämäläinen, Jari, 2016. "A Multiple Actuator Block model for vertical axis wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 592-601.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:2101-:d:533272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.