IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i2p403-d479260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Continuous Integrated Process of Biodiesel Production and Purification—The End of the Conventional Two-Stage Batch Process?

Author

Listed:
  • Matea Bačić

    (Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, University of Zagreb, Marulićev trg 19, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Anabela Ljubić

    (Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, University of Zagreb, Marulićev trg 19, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Martin Gojun

    (Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, University of Zagreb, Marulićev trg 19, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Anita Šalić

    (Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, University of Zagreb, Marulićev trg 19, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Ana Jurinjak Tušek

    (Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Bruno Zelić

    (Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, University of Zagreb, Marulićev trg 19, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

In this research, optimization of the integrated biodiesel production process composed of transesterification of edible sunflower oil, catalyzed by commercial lipase, with simultaneous extraction of glycerol from the reaction mixture was performed. Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) were used in this integrated process as the reaction and extraction media. For two systems, choline chloride:glycerol (ChCl:Gly) and choline chloride:ethylene glycol (ChCl:EG), respectively, the optimal water content, mass ratio of the phase containing the mixture of reactants (oil and methanol) with an enzyme and a DES phase (mass ratio of phases), and the molar ratio of deep eutectic solvent constituents were determined using response surface methodology (RSM). Experiments performed with ChCl:Gly resulted in a higher biodiesel yield and higher glycerol extraction efficiency, namely, a mass ratio of phases of 1:1, a mass fraction of water of 6.6%, and a molar ratio of the ChCl:Gly of 1:3.5 were determined to be the optimal process conditions. When the reaction was performed in a batch reactor under the optimal conditions, the process resulted in a 43.54 ± 0.2% yield and 99.54 ± 0.19% glycerol extraction efficiency ( t = 2 h). Unfortunately, the free glycerol content was higher than the one defined by international standards ( w G > 0.02%); therefore, the process was performed in a microsystem to enhance the mass transfer. Gaining the same yield and free glycerol content below the standards ( w G = 0.0019 ± 0.003%), the microsystem proved to be a good direction for future process optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Matea Bačić & Anabela Ljubić & Martin Gojun & Anita Šalić & Ana Jurinjak Tušek & Bruno Zelić, 2021. "Continuous Integrated Process of Biodiesel Production and Purification—The End of the Conventional Two-Stage Batch Process?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:403-:d:479260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/2/403/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/2/403/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chattopadhyay, Soham & Sen, Ramkrishna, 2013. "Fuel properties, engine performance and environmental benefits of biodiesel produced by a green process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 319-326.
    2. Román-Figueroa, Celián & Olivares-Carrillo, Pilar & Paneque, Manuel & Palacios-Nereo, Francisco Javier & Quesada-Medina, Joaquín, 2016. "High-yield production of biodiesel by non-catalytic supercritical methanol transesterification of crude castor oil (Ricinus communis)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 165-171.
    3. Chang, Wei-Ru & Hwang, Jenn-Jiang & Wu, Wei, 2017. "Environmental impact and sustainability study on biofuels for transportation applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 277-288.
    4. Aboelazayem, Omar & Gadalla, Mamdouh & Saha, Basudeb, 2018. "Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil via supercritical methanol: Optimisation and reactor simulation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 144-154.
    5. De Oliveira, Fernando C. & Coelho, Suani T., 2017. "History, evolution, and environmental impact of biodiesel in Brazil: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 168-179.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Violeta Makareviciene, 2022. "Advances in Catalytic Technologies for Biodiesel Fuel Synthesis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-4, January.
    2. Gojun, Martin & Šalić, Anita & Zelić, Bruno, 2021. "Integrated microsystems for lipase-catalyzed biodiesel production and glycerol removal by extraction or ultrafiltration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 213-221.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aboelazayem, Omar & Gadalla, Mamdouh & Saha, Basudeb, 2018. "Valorisation of high acid value waste cooking oil into biodiesel using supercritical methanolysis: Experimental assessment and statistical optimisation on typical Egyptian feedstock," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 408-420.
    2. Lee, Boreum & Park, Junhyung & Lee, Hyunjun & Byun, Manhee & Yoon, Chang Won & Lim, Hankwon, 2019. "Assessment of the economic potential: COx-free hydrogen production from renewables via ammonia decomposition for small-sized H2 refueling stations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Iwona Bąk & Anna Spoz & Magdalena Zioło & Marek Dylewski, 2021. "Dynamic Analysis of the Similarity of Objects in Research on the Use of Renewable Energy Resources in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Aboelazayem, Omar & Gadalla, Mamdouh & Saha, Basudeb, 2019. "Derivatisation-free characterisation and supercritical conversion of free fatty acids into biodiesel from high acid value waste cooking oil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 77-90.
    5. Mahlia, T.M.I. & Syazmi, Z.A.H.S. & Mofijur, M. & Abas, A.E. Pg & Bilad, M.R. & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Silitonga, A.S., 2020. "Patent landscape review on biodiesel production: Technology updates," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    6. Huang, Jiangfeng & Khan, Muhammad Tahir & Perecin, Danilo & Coelho, Suani T. & Zhang, Muqing, 2020. "Sugarcane for bioethanol production: Potential of bagasse in Chinese perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. García-Martín, Juan Francisco & Barrios, Carmen C. & Alés-Álvarez, Francisco-Javier & Dominguez-Sáez, Aida & Alvarez-Mateos, Paloma, 2018. "Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil in an oscillatory flow reactor. Performance as a fuel on a TDI diesel engine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 546-556.
    8. Jhonathan Fernandes Torres Souza & Sergio Almeida Pacca, 2019. "How far can low-carbon energy scenarios reach based on proven technologies?," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 687-705, June.
    9. Zhang, Tianyi & Shahbaz, Kaveh & Farid, Mohammed M., 2020. "Glycerolysis of free fatty acid in vegetable oil deodorizer distillate catalyzed by phosphonium-based deep eutectic solvent," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 363-373.
    10. Babu, D. & Thangarasu, Vinoth & Ramanathan, Anand, 2020. "Artificial neural network approach on forecasting diesel engine characteristics fuelled with waste frying oil biodiesel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    11. Sina Faizollahzadeh Ardabili & Bahman Najafi & Meysam Alizamir & Amir Mosavi & Shahaboddin Shamshirband & Timon Rabczuk, 2018. "Using SVM-RSM and ELM-RSM Approaches for Optimizing the Production Process of Methyl and Ethyl Esters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Zhu, Qing-li & Gu, Heng & Ke, Zengguang, 2018. "Congeneration biodiesel, ricinine and nontoxic meal from castor seed," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 51-59.
    13. Paul, Abhishek & Panua, Raj Sekhar & Debroy, Durbadal & Bose, Probir Kumar, 2014. "Effect of compressed natural gas dual fuel operation with diesel and Pongamia pinnata methyl ester (PPME) as pilot fuels on performance and emission characteristics of a CI (compression ignition) engi," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 495-509.
    14. de Medeiros, Eliane Freitas & Vieira, Bruno Muller & de Pereira, Cláudio Martin Pereira & Nadaleti, Willian Cézar & Quadro, Maurízio Silveira & Andreazza, Robson, 2019. "Production of biodiesel using oil obtained from fish processing residue by conventional methods assisted by ultrasonic waves: Heating and stirring," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1357-1365.
    15. Zahra Echresh Zadeh & Ali Abdulkhani & Basudeb Saha, 2020. "Characterization of Fast Pyrolysis Bio-Oil from Hardwood and Softwood Lignin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    16. Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Masjuki, H.H. & Mahlia, T.M.I. & Silitonga, A.S. & Chong, W.T. & Yusaf, Talal, 2014. "Engine performance and emissions using Jatropha curcas, Ceiba pentandra and Calophyllum inophyllum biodiesel in a CI diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 427-445.
    17. Teo, Siow Hwa & Islam, Aminul & Mansir, Nasar & Shamsuddin, Mohd Razali & Joseph, Collin G. & Goto, Motonobu & Taufiq-Yap, Yun Hin, 2022. "Sustainable biofuel production approach: Critical methanol green transesterification by efficient and stable heterogeneous catalyst," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    18. Shemelis N. Gebremariam & Trine Hvoslef-Eide & Meseret T. Terfa & Jorge M. Marchetti, 2019. "Techno-Economic Performance of Different Technological Based Bio-Refineries for Biofuel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-21, October.
    19. Arumugam, A. & Ponnusami, V., 2019. "Biodiesel production from Calophyllum inophyllum oil a potential non-edible feedstock: An overview," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 459-471.
    20. Liang, Jin & Yang, Shiliang & Gao, Wengui & Hu, Jianhang & Wang, Hua, 2022. "MP-PIC investigation of glycerol steam reforming in bubbling fluidized bed for high-quality hydrogen production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 319-333.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:403-:d:479260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.