IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i2p385-d478869.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Size-Segregated Particulate Matter from Gasification of Bulgarian Agro-Forest Biomass Residue

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo Ferreira

    (IDMEC, Mechanical Engineering Department, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Tsvetelina Petrova

    (College of Energy and Electronics, Technical University of Sofia, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Ana F. Ferreira

    (IDMEC, Mechanical Engineering Department, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Mário Costa

    (IDMEC, Mechanical Engineering Department, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Iliyana Inaydenova

    (College of Energy and Electronics, Technical University of Sofia, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Stela Atanasova-Vladimirova

    (Institute of Physical Chemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Bogdan Ranguelov

    (Institute of Physical Chemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

The main purpose of the present work was to evaluate the efficiency of the gasification process of three different types of agro-forest biomass residue (rapeseed, softwood, and sunflower husks) along with the characterization of size-segregated particulates’ emissions. The experiments were carried out in a drop tube furnace (DTF), using two different gasifying agents (O 2 /N 2 and O 2 /N 2 /CO 2 ) at atmospheric pressure and a constant temperature of 1000 °C. In focus was the effect of biomass and the gasifying agent on syngas composition (CO, H 2 , CH 4, and CO 2 ), cold gas and carbon conversion efficiency, and on the emissions of by-products, such as particulate matter (PM), known for having negative environmental and health impacts. The collected particulates were characterized by SEM/EDS and XPS analysis. The results reveal that: (i) the introduction of CO 2 increased the production of CO and CH 4 and syngas’ lower heating value (LHV), thus leading to higher cold gas and carbon conversion efficiency; (ii) CO 2 decreased the production of H 2 , leading to lower H 2 /CO ratio (between 0.25 and 0.9). Therefore, the generated syngas is suitable for the synthesis of higher hydrocarbons, (iii) CO 2 lowered the emissions of char (cyclone) particles but increased the overall PM 10–0.3 . Submicron size PM was the dominant fraction (PM 1–0.3 ) in O 2 /N 2 and (PM 1.6–0.3 ) in O 2 /N 2 /CO 2 . Unimodal PM size distribution was observed, except for sunflower husks gasification in O 2 /N 2 /CO 2 ; (iv) the SEM/EDS and XPS analysis confirmed that submicron-sized PM 1–0.3 contain above 80% of carbon associated to soot, due to incomplete oxidation, whereas in cyclone (char) particles, carbon decreased to about 50%. The SEM/EDS results showed that K and Cl are typical constituents of the submicron size PM, whereas the alkaline earth metals were detected mainly in fine and coarse particulates. Detailed analysis of the XPS (C1s) spectra showed that the most common oxygen-containing groups on the PM 1 surface were carbonyl and carboxyl.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo Ferreira & Tsvetelina Petrova & Ana F. Ferreira & Mário Costa & Iliyana Inaydenova & Stela Atanasova-Vladimirova & Bogdan Ranguelov, 2021. "Size-Segregated Particulate Matter from Gasification of Bulgarian Agro-Forest Biomass Residue," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:385-:d:478869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/2/385/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/2/385/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gao, Ying & Wang, Xianhua & Chen, Yingquan & Li, Pan & Liu, Huihui & Chen, Hanping, 2017. "Pyrolysis of rapeseed stalk: Influence of temperature on product characteristics and economic costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 482-491.
    2. Nikolaev, Angel & Konidari, Popi, 2017. "Development and assessment of renewable energy policy scenarios by 2030 for Bulgaria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 792-802.
    3. Iliyana Naydenova & Tsvetelina Petrova & Rositsa Velichkova & Iskra Simova, 2018. "Pm10 Exceedance In Bulgaria," CBU International Conference Proceedings, ISE Research Institute, vol. 6(0), pages 1129-1138, September.
    4. La Villetta, M. & Costa, M. & Massarotti, N., 2017. "Modelling approaches to biomass gasification: A review with emphasis on the stoichiometric method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 71-88.
    5. Shen, Ye & Li, Xian & Yao, Zhiyi & Cui, Xiaoqiang & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2019. "CO2 gasification of woody biomass: Experimental study from a lab-scale reactor to a small-scale autothermal gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 497-506.
    6. Aghaalikhani, Arash & Schmid, Johannes C. & Borello, Domenico & Fuchs, Joseph & Benedikt, Florian & Hofbauer, Herman & Rispoli, Franco & Henriksen, Ulrick B. & Sárossy, Zsuzsa & Cedola, Luca, 2019. "Detailed modelling of biomass steam gasification in a dual fluidized bed gasifier with temperature variation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 703-718.
    7. Asadullah, Mohammad, 2014. "Biomass gasification gas cleaning for downstream applications: A comparative critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 118-132.
    8. Popp, J. & Lakner, Z. & Harangi-Rákos, M. & Fári, M., 2014. "The effect of bioenergy expansion: Food, energy, and environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 559-578.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Makarfi Isa, Yusuf & Ganda, Elvis Tinashe, 2018. "Bio-oil as a potential source of petroleum range fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 69-75.
    2. Yepes Maya, Diego Mauricio & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & Andrade, Rubenildo Vieira & Ratner, Albert & Martínez Angel, Juan Daniel, 2021. "Biomass gasification using mixtures of air, saturated steam, and oxygen in a two-stage downdraft gasifier. Assessment using a CFD modeling approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1014-1030.
    3. Ajorloo, Mojtaba & Ghodrat, Maryam & Scott, Jason & Strezov, Vladimir, 2022. "Modelling and statistical analysis of plastic biomass mixture co-gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    4. Mohsin Raza & Abrar Inayat & Ashfaq Ahmed & Farrukh Jamil & Chaouki Ghenai & Salman R. Naqvi & Abdallah Shanableh & Muhammad Ayoub & Ammara Waris & Young-Kwon Park, 2021. "Progress of the Pyrolyzer Reactors and Advanced Technologies for Biomass Pyrolysis Processing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-42, October.
    5. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2020. "Gasification-based biorefinery integration in the pulp and paper industry: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Díaz González, Carlos A. & Pacheco Sandoval, Leonardo, 2020. "Sustainability aspects of biomass gasification systems for small power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Ratikorn Sornumpol & Dang Saebea & Amornchai Arpornwichanop & Yaneeporn Patcharavorachot, 2023. "Process Optimization and CO 2 Emission Analysis of Coal/Biomass Gasification Integrated with a Chemical Looping Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Meike Weltin & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Sustainable Intensification Farming as an Enabler for Farm Eco-Efficiency?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(1), pages 315-342, January.
    9. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    10. Baudry, Gino & Delrue, Florian & Legrand, Jack & Pruvost, Jérémy & Vallée, Thomas, 2017. "The challenge of measuring biofuel sustainability: A stakeholder-driven approach applied to the French case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 933-947.
    11. Dániel Fróna & János Szenderák & Mónika Harangi-Rákos, 2019. "The Challenge of Feeding the World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Neves, Renato Cruz & Klein, Bruno Colling & da Silva, Ricardo Justino & Rezende, Mylene Cristina Alves Ferreira & Funke, Axel & Olivarez-Gómez, Edgardo & Bonomi, Antonio & Maciel-Filho, Rubens, 2020. "A vision on biomass-to-liquids (BTL) thermochemical routes in integrated sugarcane biorefineries for biojet fuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    13. Michela Costa & Maurizio La Villetta & Daniele Piazzullo & Domenico Cirillo, 2021. "A Phenomenological Model of a Downdraft Biomass Gasifier Flexible to the Feedstock Composition and the Reactor Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    14. M. N. Uddin & Kuaanan Techato & Juntakan Taweekun & Md Mofijur Rahman & M. G. Rasul & T. M. I. Mahlia & S. M. Ashrafur, 2018. "An Overview of Recent Developments in Biomass Pyrolysis Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, November.
    15. Sharma, Monikankana & N, Rakesh & Dasappa, S., 2016. "Solid oxide fuel cell operating with biomass derived producer gas: Status and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 450-463.
    16. Vakalis, Stergios & Moustakas, Konstantinos, 2019. "Modelling of advanced gasification systems (MAGSY): Simulation and validation for the case of the rising co-current reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 526-533.
    17. Ruivo, Luís & Silva, Tiago & Neves, Daniel & Tarelho, Luís & Frade, Jorge, 2023. "Thermodynamic guidelines for improved operation of iron-based catalysts in gasification of biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    18. Ru Fang, Yan & Zhang, Silu & Zhou, Ziqiao & Shi, Wenjun & Hui Xie, Guang, 2022. "Sustainable development in China: Valuation of bioenergy potential and CO2 reduction from crop straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    19. Rozina, & Ahmad, Mushtaq & Zafar, Muhammad & Ali, Nasir & Lu, Houfang, 2017. "Biodiesel synthesis from Saussurea heteromalla (D.Don) Hand-Mazz integrating ethanol production using biorefinery approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1810-1818.
    20. Qiu, Rui & Hou, Shuhua & Meng, Zhiyi, 2021. "Low carbon air transport development trends and policy implications based on a scientometrics-based data analysis system," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-10.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:385-:d:478869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.