IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i22p7766-d683077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fluidized Bed Combustion and Gasification of Fossil and Renewable Slurry Fuels

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Miccio

    (Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologia dei Materiali Ceramici (ISTEC)-CNR, Via Granarolo 63, 40069 Faenza, Italy)

  • Federica Raganati

    (Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie per l’Energia e la Mobilità Sostenibili (STEMS), Via G. Marconi, 80125 Napoli, Italy)

  • Paola Ammendola

    (Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie per l’Energia e la Mobilità Sostenibili (STEMS), Via G. Marconi, 80125 Napoli, Italy)

  • Farouk Okasha

    (Department of Mechanical Power Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Mansoura, Republic Street, Mansoura 35516, Egypt)

  • Michele Miccio

    (Dipartimento Ingegneria Industriale (DIIN), Università degli Studi di Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy)

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive review of the state of the art and more recent developments of the thermochemical treatments of slurry fuels in fluidized beds (FB). The review focuses on FB combustion and gasification of slurry fuels based on coal, biomass, sludge, and wastes from industry, agriculture, and the civil sector. The investigations at research and industrial levels over the last decades are presented and discussed, highlighting the adopted technological solutions, the results in terms of feasibility and efficiency, and the perspectives of future development. The different behavior between bubbling and circulating beds was addressed, in particular the optimal choice depending on the process (combustion/gasification/pyrolysis) and fuel properties (e.g., water content). Fundamental studies on interactions between the slurry fuels and the hot bed materials are also reviewed. The cumulative trend of reviewed investigations over the last decades depicts the abandonment of coal-based mixtures used in large plants, and the growing interest in the use of biomass-based slurries for small size application. In this respect, the shift from coal to biomass opens new challenges because of the different properties of biomass (density, fibrous structure, spontaneous degradation, hydrophilic behavior, etc.). Biomass-based slurries circumvent problems posed by using solid dry biomass, particularly in handling, storing, and feeding. Although slurry fuels represent a narrow sector, the results of the research investigations and the experience gained with coal can be exploited to contribute to the achievement of a circular approach based on renewable resources in the near future.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Miccio & Federica Raganati & Paola Ammendola & Farouk Okasha & Michele Miccio, 2021. "Fluidized Bed Combustion and Gasification of Fossil and Renewable Slurry Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:22:p:7766-:d:683077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/22/7766/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/22/7766/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cadavez, Carina Crisp & de Souza-Santos, Marcio L., 2021. "Efficiency of a power generation alternative regarding the composition of feeding biomass-glycerol slurry; theoretical assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    2. Kerr, K. & Probert, S.D., 1990. "Fluidised-bed incineration of acid tar wastes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 189-243.
    3. de Souza-Santos, Marcio L., 2017. "Proposals for power generation based on processes consuming biomass-glycerol slurries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 959-974.
    4. Puig-Arnavat, Maria & Bruno, Joan Carles & Coronas, Alberto, 2010. "Review and analysis of biomass gasification models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2841-2851, December.
    5. Okasha, Farouk M., 2016. "Short overview on the jetting-fountain fluidized bed (JFFB) combustor," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 674-686.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dmitrii Glushkov & Kristina Paushkina & Andrei Pleshko, 2022. "Gel Fuels: Preparing, Rheology, Atomization, Combustion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-35, December.
    2. Przemysław Migas & Witold Żukowski & Dariusz Bradło, 2023. "Catalytic Oxidation of Volatile Organic Compounds Using the Core–Shell Fe 2 O 3 -Cenospheric Catalyst in a Fluidised Bed Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Verma, Shivpal & Dregulo, Andrei Mikhailovich & Kumar, Vinay & Bhargava, Preeti Chaturvedi & Khan, Nawaz & Singh, Anuradha & Sun, Xinwei & Sindhu, Raveendran & Binod, Parameswaran & Zhang, Zengqiang &, 2023. "Reaction engineering during biomass gasification and conversion to energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    4. Vadim Dorokhov & Geniy Kuznetsov & Galina Nyashina, 2022. "Combustion of Coal and Coal Slime in Steam-Air Environment and in Slurry Form," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-23, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    2. Huda, A.S.N. & Mekhilef, S. & Ahsan, A., 2014. "Biomass energy in Bangladesh: Current status and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 504-517.
    3. Buentello-Montoya, D.A. & Duarte-Ruiz, C.A. & Maldonado-Escalante, J.F., 2023. "Co-gasification of waste PET, PP and biomass for energy recovery: A thermodynamic model to assess the produced syngas quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    4. Loha, Chanchal & Chattopadhyay, Himadri & Chatterjee, Pradip K., 2011. "Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen rich synthetic gas generation from fluidized bed gasification of rice husk," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4063-4071.
    5. Neves, Renato Cruz & Klein, Bruno Colling & da Silva, Ricardo Justino & Rezende, Mylene Cristina Alves Ferreira & Funke, Axel & Olivarez-Gómez, Edgardo & Bonomi, Antonio & Maciel-Filho, Rubens, 2020. "A vision on biomass-to-liquids (BTL) thermochemical routes in integrated sugarcane biorefineries for biojet fuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Burra, K.G. & Hussein, M.S. & Amano, R.S. & Gupta, A.K., 2016. "Syngas evolutionary behavior during chicken manure pyrolysis and air gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 408-415.
    7. Sitka, Andrzej & Szulc, Piotr & Smykowski, Daniel & Jodkowski, Wiesław, 2021. "Application of poultry manure as an energy resource by its gasification in a prototype rotary counterflow gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 422-429.
    8. Ngo, Son Ich & Nguyen, Thanh D.B. & Lim, Young-Il & Song, Byung-Ho & Lee, Uen-Do & Choi, Young-Tai & Song, Jae-Hun, 2011. "Performance evaluation for dual circulating fluidized-bed steam gasifier of biomass using quasi-equilibrium three-stage gasification model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 5208-5220.
    9. Ruivo, Luís & Silva, Tiago & Neves, Daniel & Tarelho, Luís & Frade, Jorge, 2023. "Thermodynamic guidelines for improved operation of iron-based catalysts in gasification of biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    10. Król, Danuta & Poskrobko, Sławomir, 2016. "High-methane gasification of fuels from waste – Experimental identification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 592-600.
    11. Kambo, Harpreet Singh & Dutta, Animesh, 2015. "A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 359-378.
    12. Baruah, Dipal & Baruah, D.C., 2014. "Modeling of biomass gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 806-815.
    13. Jaroslaw Krzywanski, 2019. "A General Approach in Optimization of Heat Exchangers by Bio-Inspired Artificial Intelligence Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-32, November.
    14. Chadwick, Dara T. & McDonnell, Kevin P. & Brennan, Liam P. & Fagan, Colette C. & Everard, Colm D., 2014. "Evaluation of infrared techniques for the assessment of biomass and biofuel quality parameters and conversion technology processes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 672-681.
    15. Ruiz, J.A. & Juárez, M.C. & Morales, M.P. & Muñoz, P. & Mendívil, M.A., 2013. "Biomass gasification for electricity generation: Review of current technology barriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 174-183.
    16. Yepes Maya, Diego Mauricio & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & Andrade, Rubenildo Vieira & Ratner, Albert & Martínez Angel, Juan Daniel, 2021. "Biomass gasification using mixtures of air, saturated steam, and oxygen in a two-stage downdraft gasifier. Assessment using a CFD modeling approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1014-1030.
    17. Song, Yuhang & Tian, Ye & Zhou, Xiong & Liang, Shimang & Li, Xuanyu & Yang, Yu & Yuan, Liang, 2021. "Simulation of air-steam gasification of pine sawdust in an updraft gasification system for production of hydrogen-rich producer gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    18. La Villetta, M. & Costa, M. & Massarotti, N., 2017. "Modelling approaches to biomass gasification: A review with emphasis on the stoichiometric method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 71-88.
    19. Detchusananard, Thanaphorn & Im-orb, Karittha & Maréchal, François & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2020. "Analysis of the sorption-enhanced chemical looping biomass gasification process: Performance assessment and optimization through design of experiment approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    20. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "A Holistic Review on Biomass Gasification Modified Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:22:p:7766-:d:683077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.