IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i19p6227-d646897.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Supercritical CO 2 Cycle Using Zigzag Channel Pre-Cooler: A Design Optimization Study Based on Deep Neural Network

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammed Saeed

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 127788, United Arab Emirates)

  • Abdallah S. Berrouk

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 127788, United Arab Emirates
    Center for Catalysis and Separation (CeCas), Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 127788, United Arab Emirates)

  • Munendra Pal Singh

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 127788, United Arab Emirates)

  • Khaled Alawadhi

    (Department of Automotive and Marine Engineering Technology, College of Technological Studies, The Public Authority for Applied Education and Training, Shuwaikh, Kuwait City 70654, Kuwait)

  • Muhammad Salman Siddiqui

    (Faculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1430 Ås, Norway)

Abstract

The role of a pre-cooler is critical to the sCO 2 -BC as it not only acts as a sink but also controls the conditions at the main compressor’s inlet that are vital to the cycle’s overall performance. Despite their prime importance, studies on the pre-cooler’s design are hard to find in the literature. This is partly due to the unavailability of data around the complex thermohydraulic characteristics linked with their operation close to the critical point. Henceforth, the current work deals with designing and optimizing pre-cooler by utilizing machine learning (ML), an in-house recuperator and pre-cooler design, an analysis code (RPDAC), and a cycle design point code (CDPC). Initially, data computed using 3D Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equation is used to train the machine learning (ML) model based on the deep neural network (DNN) to predict Nusselt number ( N u ) and friction factor ( f ). The trained ML model is then used in the pre-cooler design and optimization code (RPDAC) to generate various designs of the pre-cooler. Later, RPDAC was linked with the cycle design point code (CDPC) to understand the impact of various designs of the pre-cooler on the cycle’s performance. Finally, a multi-objective genetic algorithm was used to optimize the pre-cooler geometry in the environment of the power cycle. Results suggest that the trained ML model can approximate 99% of the data with 90% certainty in the pre-cooler’s operating regime. Cycle simulation results suggest that the cycle’s performance calculation can be misleading without considering the pre-cooler’s pumping power. Moreover, the optimization study indicates that the compressor’s inlet temperature ranging from 307.5 to 308.5 and pre-cooler channel’s Reynolds number ranging from 28,000 to 30,000 would be a good compromise between the cycle’s efficiency and the pre-cooler’s size.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammed Saeed & Abdallah S. Berrouk & Munendra Pal Singh & Khaled Alawadhi & Muhammad Salman Siddiqui, 2021. "Analysis of Supercritical CO 2 Cycle Using Zigzag Channel Pre-Cooler: A Design Optimization Study Based on Deep Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-28, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6227-:d:646897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6227/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6227/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Binotti, Marco & Astolfi, Marco & Campanari, Stefano & Manzolini, Giampaolo & Silva, Paolo, 2017. "Preliminary assessment of sCO2 cycles for power generation in CSP solar tower plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1007-1017.
    2. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    3. Siddiqui, M. Salman & Khalid, Muhammad Hamza & Zahoor, Rizwan & Butt, Fahad Sarfraz & Saeed, Muhammed & Badar, Abdul Waheed, 2021. "A numerical investigation to analyze effect of turbulence and ground clearance on the performance of a roof top vertical–axis wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 978-989.
    4. Saeed, Muhammad & Kim, Man-Hoe, 2018. "Analysis of a recompression supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle with an integrated turbine design/optimization algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 93-111.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Saeed & Abdallah S. Berrouk & Burhani M. Burhani & Ahmed M. Alatyar & Yasser F. Al Wahedi, 2021. "Turbine Design and Optimization for a Supercritical CO 2 Cycle Using a Multifaceted Approach Based on Deep Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-27, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Off-design performance of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with a solar power tower system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    2. Xiao, Tingyu & Liu, Chao & Wang, Xurong & Wang, Shukun & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Li, Qibin & Li, Xiaoxiao, 2022. "Life cycle assessment of the solar thermal power plant integrated with air-cooled supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 119-133.
    3. Xu, Zhen & Liu, Xinxin & Xie, Yingchun, 2023. "Off-design performances of a dry-cooled supercritical recompression Brayton cycle using CO2–H2S as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    4. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "A review on integrated design and off-design operation of solar power tower system with S–CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    5. Kunniyoor, Vijayaraj & Singh, Punit & Nadella, Karthik, 2020. "Value of closed-cycle gas turbines with design assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    6. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2021. "Load matching and techno-economic analysis of CSP plant with S–CO2 Brayton cycle in CSP-PV-wind hybrid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    7. Zhang, Yifan & Li, Hongzhi & Han, Wanlong & Bai, Wengang & Yang, Yu & Yao, Mingyu & Wang, Yueming, 2018. "Improved design of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle for coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1-14.
    8. Marchionni, Matteo & Bianchi, Giuseppe & Tassou, Savvas A., 2018. "Techno-economic assessment of Joule-Brayton cycle architectures for heat to power conversion from high-grade heat sources using CO2 in the supercritical state," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1140-1152.
    9. Sleiti, Ahmad K. & Al-Ammari, Wahib A., 2021. "Off-design performance analysis of combined CSP power and direct oxy-combustion supercritical carbon dioxide cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 14-29.
    10. Wang, Xurong & Li, Xiaoxiao & Li, Qibin & Liu, Lang & Liu, Chao, 2020. "Performance of a solar thermal power plant with direct air-cooled supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle under off-design conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    11. Muhammed Saeed & Khaled Alawadi & Sung Chul Kim, 2020. "Performance of Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycle and Its Turbomachinery with the Printed Circuit Heat Exchanger with Straight and Zigzag Channels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, December.
    12. Sleiti, Ahmad K. & Al-Ammari, Wahib & Ahmed, Samer & Kapat, Jayanta, 2021. "Direct-fired oxy-combustion supercritical-CO2 power cycle with novel preheating configurations -thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    13. Xu, Cheng & Zhang, Qiang & Yang, Zhiping & Li, Xiaosa & Xu, Gang & Yang, Yongping, 2018. "An improved supercritical coal-fired power generation system incorporating a supplementary supercritical CO2 cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1319-1329.
    14. Li, Xinyu & Qin, Zheng & Dong, Keyong & Wang, Lintao & Lin, Zhimin, 2023. "Experimental study of the startup of a supercritical CO2 recompression power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    15. Liu, Xuejiao & Zhong, Wenqi & Li, Pingjiao & Xiang, Jun & Liu, Guoyao, 2019. "Design and performance analysis of coal-fired fluidized bed for supercritical CO2 power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 468-478.
    16. Saeed, Muhammad & Kim, Man-Hoe, 2022. "A newly proposed supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle configuration to enhance energy sources integration capability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    17. Tesio, U. & Guelpa, E. & Verda, V., 2022. "Comparison of sCO2 and He Brayton cycles integration in a Calcium-Looping for Concentrated Solar Power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    18. Miguel Ángel Reyes-Belmonte, 2020. "A Bibliometric Study on Integrated Solar Combined Cycles (ISCC), Trends and Future Based on Data Analytics Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-29, October.
    19. Liu, Zhiyuan & Wang, Peng & Sun, Xiangyu & Zhao, Ben, 2022. "Analysis on thermodynamic and economic performances of supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle with the dynamic component models and constraint conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    20. Xu, Jinliang & Sun, Enhui & Li, Mingjia & Liu, Huan & Zhu, Bingguo, 2018. "Key issues and solution strategies for supercritical carbon dioxide coal fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 227-246.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6227-:d:646897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.