IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i19p6174-d644652.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Environmental Assessment in the Application of Preventive Protection for Wind Farm Noise—Case Study: Maestrale Ring Wind Farm

Author

Listed:
  • Boško D. Josimović

    (Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Aleksandar Cvjetić

    (Faculty of Mining and Geology, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Božidar Manić

    (Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

Determining the spatial position of wind turbines is the initial and most important phase in the development of a wind farm project. In this sensitive phase, all potential problems that may arise in the later stages of project development should be prevented by means of spatial and urban planning instruments. This makes it possible to achieve maximum use of the potential of wind in a particular space and, thus, fulfil the technical and economic requirements of the project while respecting the goals of environmental protection in that same area, through preventive protection. Therefore, it is essential, even at the earliest planning and development stage of a wind farm project, for the requirements that are important for optimal spatial solutions to be balanced. In this process, strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is a support to the planning process and an invaluable instrument for finding optimal spatial solutions for the possible key spatial impacts of wind power with regard to noise, shadow flicker, ornithofauna and chiropterofauna. The weakness of SEA can be seen in its predominant application of expert qualitative methods that bring with them subjectivity, since they depend on expert knowledge and skills. This paper presents the aspect of noise impact assessment and its inclusion in the SEA for the Maestrale Ring wind farm in Serbia. The results of the research indicate how it is possible to achieve the principle of objectivity in the process of multicriteria expert evaluation by including the results of a partial impact assessment of the noise from wind farms, using results obtained from software modeling of the spatial dispersion of wind turbine noise in the SoundPlan 8.1 software package in the SEA process. These quantitative results predicting the noise level were used in a semi-quantitative method of multicriteria evaluation in the SEA through the definition of criteria to determine the ranking of impacts, which is elaborated in the paper. The results also show the significant of the contribution of applying a methodological approach based on a combination of qualitative and quantitative evaluation methods in SEA. These methods positively affect the application of the principle of preventive protection through the optimal selection of the number and position of wind turbines on one hand and the objectivity of drawing conclusions based on which strategic decisions are made in the final phase of the SEA process, on the other.

Suggested Citation

  • Boško D. Josimović & Aleksandar Cvjetić & Božidar Manić, 2021. "Strategic Environmental Assessment in the Application of Preventive Protection for Wind Farm Noise—Case Study: Maestrale Ring Wind Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6174-:d:644652
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6174/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/19/6174/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sedaghatizadeh, Nima & Arjomandi, Maziar & Cazzolato, Benjamin & Kelso, Richard, 2017. "Wind farm noises: Mechanisms and evidence for their dependency on wind direction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 311-322.
    2. Måns Nilsson & Holger Dalkmann, 2001. "Decision Making And Strategic Environmental Assessment," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(03), pages 305-327.
    3. Al Zohbi, G. & Hendrick, P. & Bouillard, Ph., 2015. "Evaluation of the impact of wind farms on birds: The case study of Lebanon," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 682-689.
    4. Zhang, Yuning & Tang, Ningning & Niu, Yuguang & Du, Xiaoze, 2016. "Wind energy rejection in China: Current status, reasons and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 322-344.
    5. Maslov, Nicolas & Claramunt, Christophe & Wang, Tianzhen & Tang, Tianhao, 2017. "Method to estimate the visual impact of an offshore wind farm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1422-1430.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boško Josimović & Božidar Manić & Nikola Krunić, 2022. "Strategic Environmental Assessment as a Support in a Sustainable National Waste Management Program—European Experience in Serbia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-13, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Josimović, Boško & Cvjetić, Aleksandar & Furundžić, Danilo, 2021. "Strategic Environmental Assessment and the precautionary principle in the spatial planning of wind farms – European experience in Serbia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    2. Mahmoudan, Alireza & Samadof, Parviz & Hosseinzadeh, Siamak & Garcia, Davide Astiaso, 2021. "A multigeneration cascade system using ground-source energy with cold recovery: 3E analyses and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    3. Oscar Reicher & Verónica Delgado & José-Luis Arumi, 2021. "Use of Indicators in Strategic Environmental Assessments of Urban-Planning Instruments: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Garcet, J. & De Meulenaere, R. & Blondeau, J., 2022. "Enabling flexible CHP operation for grid support by exploiting the DHN thermal inertia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
    5. Huiqian Guo & ELSaeed Saad ELSihy & Zhirong Liao & Xiaoze Du, 2021. "A Comparative Study on the Performance of Single and Multi-Layer Encapsulated Phase Change Material Packed-Bed Thermocline Tanks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Li, Chong & Zhou, Dequn & Wang, Hui & Lu, Yuzheng & Li, Dongdong, 2020. "Techno-economic performance study of stand-alone wind/diesel/battery hybrid system with different battery technologies in the cold region of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    7. Siamak Hoseinzadeh & Daniele Groppi & Adriana Scarlet Sferra & Umberto Di Matteo & Davide Astiaso Garcia, 2022. "The PRISMI Plus Toolkit Application to a Grid-Connected Mediterranean Island," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Feng, Ju & Shen, Wen Zhong, 2017. "Design optimization of offshore wind farms with multiple types of wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1283-1297.
    9. Yan Li & Ce Sun & Yu Jiang & Fang Feng, 2019. "Scaling Method of the Rotating Blade of a Wind Turbine for a Rime Ice Wind Tunnel Test," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Joos, Michael & Staffell, Iain, 2018. "Short-term integration costs of variable renewable energy: Wind curtailment and balancing in Britain and Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 45-65.
    11. Sklenicka, Petr & Zouhar, Jan, 2018. "Predicting the visual impact of onshore wind farms via landscape indices: A method for objectivizing planning and decision processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 445-454.
    12. Diana Suhardiman & Mark Giordano & François Molle, 2015. "Between Interests and Worldviews: The Narrow Path of the Mekong River Commission," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(1), pages 199-217, February.
    13. Zhao, Zhen-Yu & Chen, Yu-Long & Li, Heng, 2019. "What affects the development of renewable energy power generation projects in China: ISM analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 506-517.
    14. Ding, Zeyu & Hou, Hongjuan & Duan, Liqiang & Huang, Chang & Hu, Eric & Yu, Gang & Zhang, Yumeng & Zhang, Nan, 2021. "Simulation study on a novel solar aided combined heat and power system for heat-power decoupling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    15. Wang, Xuefei & Zeng, Xiangwu & Yang, Xu & Li, Jiale, 2018. "Feasibility study of offshore wind turbines with hybrid monopile foundation based on centrifuge modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 127-139.
    16. Shuo Zhang & Li Chen & Yidan Zheng & Yingzi Li & Ying Li & Ming Zeng, 2021. "How Policies Guide and Promoted Wind Power to Market Transactions in China during the 2010s," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.
    17. Eichhorn, Marcus & Masurowski, Frank & Becker, Raik & Thrän, Daniela, 2019. "Wind energy expansion scenarios – A spatial sustainability assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 367-375.
    18. Gao, Dan & Li, Zheng & Liu, Pei & Zhao, Jiazhu & Zhang, Yuning & Li, Canbing, 2018. "A coordinated energy security model taking strategic petroleum reserve and alternative fuels into consideration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 171-181.
    19. Bhave, Ajay Gajanan & Conway, Declan & Dessai, Suraje & Stainforth, David A., 2017. "Barriers and opportunities for robust decision making approaches to support climate change adaptation in the developing world," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68318, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Rivarolo, M. & Freda, A. & Traverso, A., 2020. "Test campaign and application of a small-scale ducted wind turbine with analysis of yaw angle influence," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6174-:d:644652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.