IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i18p5809-d635313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Crowdsourcing as Part of User-Driven Innovation Activity Affect Its Results? An Empirical Analysis of R&D Departments in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Szopik-Depczyńska

    (Faculty of Economics, Finance and Management, Institute of Management, University of Szczecin, Cukrowa 8, 71-004 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Izabela Dembińska

    (Faculty of Economics and Engineering of Transport, Maritime University of Szczecin, ul. Pobożnego 11, 70-507 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Barczak

    (Faculty of Economics, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, ul. Janickiego 31, 71-270 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Angelika Kędzierska-Szczepaniak

    (Faculty of Management, University of Gdansk, ul. Armii Krajowej 101, 82-814 Sopot, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Szczepaniak

    (Faculty of Management, University of Gdansk, ul. Armii Krajowej 101, 82-814 Sopot, Poland)

  • Radosław Depczyński

    (Doctoral School, Institute of Management, University of Szczecin, Cukrowa 8, 71-004 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Giuseppe Ioppolo

    (Department of Economics, University of Messina, Via dei Verdi 75, 98122 Messina, Italy)

Abstract

Entrepreneurs have long been convinced about the power and possibilities of the Internet. Nowadays, the Internet is an integral tool for the functioning of a company, not only as an alternative distribution channel, but also as a channel of information and communication flow, a means of interaction with the environment. The increasing use of the Internet, and especially of social media, made it possible to escalate the activity of various social groups in various areas of the company’s activity, including innovation, leading to the development of crowdsourcing. Crowdsourcing has redefined the existing production rules and ways of using labor resources. Its potential lies in openness, partnership, resource sharing and global action. There are already many studies on crowdsourcing and innovation, but little attention is paid to the relationship between crowdsourcing and the determinants of innovation activity. Thus, the aim of this research is examining whether the use of crowdsourcing while cooperating with product users in accordance with the concept of user-driven innovation (UDI) has an impact on selected aspects of innovative activity. An original questionnaire was used for the study. Fifty-seven R&D departments in Poland participated in the research. For the purpose of the analysis, the Kendall and V-Cramer tau correlation coefficient was used. These methods are complemented by the Ward agglomeration method. The research results show a cooperation with consumer results in the development of innovative activities in the studied R&D departments of enterprises in Poland. Using crowdsourcing results in the introduction of more product innovations, the introduction of new or significantly improved technological processes, as well as the implementation of a greater number of research and development projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Szopik-Depczyńska & Izabela Dembińska & Agnieszka Barczak & Angelika Kędzierska-Szczepaniak & Krzysztof Szczepaniak & Radosław Depczyński & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2021. "Does Crowdsourcing as Part of User-Driven Innovation Activity Affect Its Results? An Empirical Analysis of R&D Departments in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5809-:d:635313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5809/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5809/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natalicchio, A. & Messeni Petruzzelli, A. & Garavelli, A.C., 2017. "Innovation problems and search for solutions in crowdsourcing platforms – A simulation approach," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 64, pages 28-42.
    2. Hamed Taherdoost, 2017. "Determining Sample Size; How to Calculate Survey Sample Size," Post-Print hal-02557333, HAL.
    3. Aladino Fernandez-Blanco & Joaquin Villanueva-Balsera & Vicente Rodriguez-Montequin & Henar Moran-Palacios, 2020. "Key Factors for Project Crowdfunding Success: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Baldwin, Carliss & Hienerth, Christoph & von Hippel, Eric, 2006. "How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 1291-1313, November.
    5. Valérie Chanal & Marie-Laurence Caron-Fasan, 2008. "How to invent a new business model based on crowdsourcing: the Crowdspirit ® case," Post-Print halshs-00370761, HAL.
    6. Onwika Kaewchur & Kongkiti Phusavat, 2013. "Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing on Information Technology and Innovation," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    7. Jiao, Yuanyuan & Wu, Yepeng & Lu, Steven, 2021. "The role of crowdsourcing in product design: The moderating effect of user expertise and network connectivity," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Claude Guittard & Eric Schenk & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2015. "Crowdsourcing and the Evolution of a Business Ecosystem," Springer Books, in: Fernando J. Garrigos-Simon & Ignacio Gil-Pechuán & Sofia Estelles-Miguel (ed.), Advances in Crowdsourcing, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 49-62, Springer.
    9. Ana Cinta González Cabral & Silvia Appelt & Tibor Hanappi, 2021. "Corporate effective tax rates for R&D: The case of expenditure-based R&D tax incentives," OECD Taxation Working Papers 54, OECD Publishing.
    10. M.-L. Caron-Fasan & V. Chanal, 2008. "How to invent a new business model based on crowdsourcing: the Crowdspiritcase," Post-Print halshs-00376837, HAL.
    11. Pollok, Patrick & Lüttgens, Dirk & Piller, Frank T., 2019. "Attracting solutions in crowdsourcing contests: The role of knowledge distance, identity disclosure, and seeker status," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 98-114.
    12. de Mattos, Claudia Aparecida & Kissimoto, Kumiko Oshio & Laurindo, Fernando José Barbin, 2018. "The role of information technology for building virtual environments to integrate crowdsourcing mechanisms into the open innovation process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 143-153.
    13. Agnieszka Barczak & Izabela Dembinska & Lukasz Marzantowicz & Katarzyna Nowicka & Katarzyna Szopik-Depczynska & Tomasz Rostkowski, 2020. "The Impact of Unpredictable Factors on the Uncertainty’s Structure in the Management of Logistics Processes," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 186-200.
    14. Onwika Kaewchur & Pornthep Anussornnitisarn & Zbigniew Pastuszak, 2013. "The Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing on Information Technology and Innovation," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 2(2), pages 227-242.
    15. Wadee Alhalabi & Miltiadis Lytras & Nada Aljohani, 2021. "Crowdsourcing Research for Social Insights into Smart Cities Applications and Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-27, July.
    16. Valérie Chanal & Marie-Laurence Caron-Fasan, 2008. "How to invent a new business model based on crowdsourcing : the Crowdspirit ® case," Post-Print halshs-00486794, HAL.
    17. Palacios-Marqués, Daniel & Gallego-Nicholls, José Fernando & Guijarro-García, María, 2021. "A recipe for success: Crowdsourcing, online social networks, and their impact on organizational performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    18. Dominik Dellermann & Nikolaus Lipusch & Philipp Ebel & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2020. "The potential of collective intelligence and crowdsourcing for opportunity creation," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 183-207.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agnieszka Barczak & Izabela Dembińska & Tomasz Rostkowski & Katarzyna Szopik-Depczyńska & Dorota Rozmus, 2021. "Structure of Remuneration as Assessed by Employees of the Energy Sector—Multivariate Correspondence Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuxiang Zhao & Qinghua Zhu, 2014. "Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 417-434, July.
    2. Eric Schenk & Claude Guittard, 2011. "Towards a characterization of crowdsourcing practices," Post-Print halshs-00439256, HAL.
    3. Nathalie Colasanti & Chiara Fantauzzi & Rocco Frondizi, 2021. "Innovating Public Service Delivery Through Crowdsourcing: What Role for The Third Sector and Civil Society?," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Regina Lenart-Gansiniec, 2017. "Factors Influencing Decisions about Crowdsourcing in the Public Sector: A Literature Review," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(6), pages 1997-2005.
    5. Feng, Yuanyue & Yi, Zihui & Yang, Congcong & Chen, Ruoyi & Feng, Ye, 2022. "How do gamification mechanics drive solvers’ Knowledge contribution? A study of collaborative knowledge crowdsourcing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    6. Isabelle Liotard, 2012. "Les plateformes d'innovation sur Internet : arrangements contractuels, intermédiation et gestion de la propriété intellectuelle," Post-Print hal-00680366, HAL.
    7. Andrea Guazzini & Mirko Duradoni & Alessandro Lazzeri & Giorgio Gronchi, 2018. "Simulating the Cost of Cooperation: A Recipe for Collaborative Problem-Solving," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Larissa Hammon & Hajo Hippner, 2012. "Crowdsourcing," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(3), pages 163-166, June.
    9. Regina Lenart-Gansiniec, 2017. "Theoretical and Methodical Aspects of Crowdsourcing: Effectiveness and Its Measuring," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 14(4), pages 43-60.
    10. Liao, Junyun & Chen, Jiawen & Mou, Jian, 2021. "Examining the antecedents of idea contribution in online innovation communities: A perspective of creative self-efficacy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    11. Piazza, Mariangela & Mazzola, Erica & Perrone, Giovanni, 2022. "How can I signal my quality to emerge from the crowd? A study in the crowdsourcing context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    12. Hu, Feng & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A. & Huizingh, Eelko K.R.E., 2020. "The impact of innovation contest briefs on the quality of solvers and solutions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 90.
    13. Yang, Xi & Zhao, Quanwu & Sun, Heshan, 2022. "Seekers’ complaint behavior in crowdsourcing: An uncertainty perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Moghaddam, Ehsan Noorzad & Aliahmadi, Alireza & Bagherzadeh, Mehdi & Markovic, Stefan & Micevski, Milena & Saghafi, Fatemeh, 2023. "Let me choose what I want: The influence of incentive choice flexibility on the quality of crowdsourcing solutions to innovation problems," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    15. Nobari, Niloofar & Dehkordi, Ali Mobini, 2023. "Innovation intelligence in managing co-creation process between tech-enabled corporations and startups," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    16. Elia, Gianluca & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Urbinati, Andrea, 2020. "Implementing open innovation through virtual brand communities: A case study analysis in the semiconductor industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    17. Rubinton, Brian J, 2011. "Crowdfunding: disintermediated investment banking," MPRA Paper 31649, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Habicht, Hagen & Oliveira, Pedro & Shcherbatiuk, Viktoriia, 2012. "User Innovators: When Patients Set Out to Help Themselves and End Up Helping Many," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 66(3), pages 277-295.
    19. Letty, Brigid & Shezi, Zanele & Mudhara, Maxwell, 2012. "An exploration of agricultural grassroots innovation in South Africa and implications for innovation indicator development," MERIT Working Papers 2012-023, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    20. Livelyn D. Argallon & Jaycee Rylle O. Loreño & Honey Jane C. Paham & Jovenil R. Bacatan, 2022. "Perceived Effects of Modular Distance Learning on the Students in Aumbay Elementary School," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(9), pages 496-506, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5809-:d:635313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.