IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i15p4420-d599338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Numerical Analysis on the Flue Gas Temperature Maintenance System of a Solid Fuel-Fired Boiler Operating at Minimum Loads

Author

Listed:
  • Michalina Kurkus-Gruszecka

    (Institute of Heat Engineering, Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 21/25, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Piotr Krawczyk

    (Institute of Heat Engineering, Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 21/25, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Janusz Lewandowski

    (Institute of Heat Engineering, Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 21/25, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Currently, energy policy is associated with the increase in the share of renewable sources in systemic energy production. Due to this trend, coal-fired power units must increase their work flexibility. Adapting a coal power plant to work with a lower load often causes the issue of maintaining the temperature before the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) installation at a sufficiently high level. This paper presents a CFD analysis of the mixing area of two flue gas streams before the SCR installation with various methods for mixing flue gas streams. The novelty of the work is mixing the flue gas streams of different temperatures using a flap shape developed by the authors. A series of numerical simulations were performed to develop the location and method of introducing the higher temperature gas, obtaining a uniform distribution of the exhaust gas temperature. The simulation scheme was applied to a series of geometrical modifications of the boundary conditions. The tested solution using only a single, straight flap in the flue gas duct allows the amplitude to be reduced from 298 K to 144 K. As a result of the research, a mixing flap design was developed to reduce the initial temperature amplitude of the flue gas streams from 298 K to 43 K.

Suggested Citation

  • Michalina Kurkus-Gruszecka & Piotr Krawczyk & Janusz Lewandowski, 2021. "Numerical Analysis on the Flue Gas Temperature Maintenance System of a Solid Fuel-Fired Boiler Operating at Minimum Loads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:15:p:4420-:d:599338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4420/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4420/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oree, Vishwamitra & Sayed Hassen, Sayed Z., 2016. "A composite metric for assessing flexibility available in conventional generators of power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 683-691.
    2. Zhao, Yongliang & Wang, Chaoyang & Liu, Ming & Chong, Daotong & Yan, Junjie, 2018. "Improving operational flexibility by regulating extraction steam of high-pressure heaters on a 660 MW supercritical coal-fired power plant: A dynamic simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1295-1309.
    3. Modliński, Norbert & Madejski, Pawel & Janda, Tomasz & Szczepanek, Krzysztof & Kordylewski, Wlodzimierz, 2015. "A validation of computational fluid dynamics temperature distribution prediction in a pulverized coal boiler with acoustic temperature measurement," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P1), pages 77-86.
    4. Alizadeh, M.I. & Parsa Moghaddam, M. & Amjady, N. & Siano, P. & Sheikh-El-Eslami, M.K., 2016. "Flexibility in future power systems with high renewable penetration: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1186-1193.
    5. Denholm, Paul & Hand, Maureen, 2011. "Grid flexibility and storage required to achieve very high penetration of variable renewable electricity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1817-1830, March.
    6. Adamczyk, Wojciech P. & Isaac, Benjamin & Parra-Alvarez, John & Smith, Sean T. & Harris, Derek & Thornock, Jeremy N. & Zhou, Minmin & Smith, Philip J. & Żmuda, Robert, 2018. "Application of LES-CFD for predicting pulverized-coal working conditions after installation of NOx control system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 693-709.
    7. Brouwer, Anne Sjoerd & van den Broek, Machteld & Seebregts, Ad & Faaij, André, 2015. "Operational flexibility and economics of power plants in future low-carbon power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 107-128.
    8. Kubik, M.L. & Coker, P.J. & Barlow, J.F., 2015. "Increasing thermal plant flexibility in a high renewables power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 102-111.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Yongliang & Wang, Chaoyang & Liu, Ming & Chong, Daotong & Yan, Junjie, 2018. "Improving operational flexibility by regulating extraction steam of high-pressure heaters on a 660 MW supercritical coal-fired power plant: A dynamic simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1295-1309.
    2. Saleh Abujarad & Mohd Wazir Mustafa & Jasrul Jamani Jamian & Abdirahman M. Abdilahi & Jeroen D. M. De Kooning & Jan Desmet & Lieven Vandevelde, 2020. "An Adjusted Weight Metric to Quantify Flexibility Available in Conventional Generators for Low Carbon Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Oree, Vishwamitra & Sayed Hassen, Sayed Z., 2016. "A composite metric for assessing flexibility available in conventional generators of power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 683-691.
    4. Zhao, Yongliang & Liu, Ming & Wang, Chaoyang & Li, Xin & Chong, Daotong & Yan, Junjie, 2018. "Increasing operational flexibility of supercritical coal-fired power plants by regulating thermal system configuration during transient processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 2375-2386.
    5. Andrychowicz, Mateusz & Olek, Blazej & Przybylski, Jakub, 2017. "Review of the methods for evaluation of renewable energy sources penetration and ramping used in the Scenario Outlook and Adequacy Forecast 2015. Case study for Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 703-714.
    6. Heydarian-Forushani, E. & Golshan, M.E.H. & Siano, Pierluigi, 2017. "Evaluating the benefits of coordinated emerging flexible resources in electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 142-154.
    7. Chang-Gi Min & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2017. "Net Load Carrying Capability of Generating Units in Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Mikkola, Jani & Lund, Peter D., 2016. "Modeling flexibility and optimal use of existing power plants with large-scale variable renewable power schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 364-375.
    9. Dong, Zhe & Liu, Miao & Zhang, Zuoyi & Dong, Yujie & Huang, Xiaojin, 2019. "Automatic generation control for the flexible operation of multimodular high temperature gas-cooled reactor plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 11-31.
    10. Stinner, Sebastian & Huchtemann, Kristian & Müller, Dirk, 2016. "Quantifying the operational flexibility of building energy systems with thermal energy storages," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 140-154.
    11. Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. & Dagoumas, Athanasios S. & Panapakidis, Ioannis P., 2017. "Impact of the penetration of renewables on flexibility needs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 360-369.
    12. Neshumayev, Dmitri & Rummel, Leo & Konist, Alar & Ots, Arvo & Parve, Teet, 2018. "Power plant fuel consumption rate during load cycling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 124-135.
    13. Abdin, Islam F. & Zio, Enrico, 2018. "An integrated framework for operational flexibility assessment in multi-period power system planning with renewable energy production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 898-914.
    14. Antti Alahäivälä & Juha Kiviluoma & Jyrki Leino & Matti Lehtonen, 2017. "System-Level Value of a Gas Engine Power Plant in Electricity and Reserve Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    15. Pavić, Ivan & Capuder, Tomislav & Kuzle, Igor, 2016. "Low carbon technologies as providers of operational flexibility in future power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 724-738.
    16. Kopiske, Jakob & Spieker, Sebastian & Tsatsaronis, George, 2017. "Value of power plant flexibility in power systems with high shares of variable renewables: A scenario outlook for Germany 2035," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 823-833.
    17. Arabzadeh, Vahid & Miettinen, Panu & Kotilainen, Titta & Herranen, Pasi & Karakoc, Alp & Kummu, Matti & Rautkari, Lauri, 2023. "Urban vertical farming with a large wind power share and optimised electricity costs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    18. Heggarty, Thomas & Bourmaud, Jean-Yves & Girard, Robin & Kariniotakis, Georges, 2020. "Quantifying power system flexibility provision," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    19. Antonelli, Marco & Desideri, Umberto & Franco, Alessandro, 2018. "Effects of large scale penetration of renewables: The Italian case in the years 2008–2015," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 3090-3100.
    20. Li, Mingquan & Shan, Rui & Virguez, Edgar & Patiño-Echeverri, Dalia & Gao, Shuo & Ma, Haichao, 2022. "Energy storage reduces costs and emissions even without large penetration of renewable energy: The case of China Southern Power Grid," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:15:p:4420-:d:599338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.