IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v224y2018icp124-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power plant fuel consumption rate during load cycling

Author

Listed:
  • Neshumayev, Dmitri
  • Rummel, Leo
  • Konist, Alar
  • Ots, Arvo
  • Parve, Teet

Abstract

A major challenge in the modern power system is the load cycling (ramping down and up) of thermal power plants due to the increase in electricity production from renewable power plants and other sources. The motivation for this paper is to quantify the effect of this on fuel consumption and as a result, variable costs. In this study, an experimental method for determining the fuel flow rate and corresponding power unit characteristics in a load-ramping operating regime was introduced and experimentally tested. The method is based on the static pressure drop of flue gas flowing through some convective heating surfaces of a boiler being proportional to the gas velocity, that is, in turn, proportional to the mass fuel rate. Therefore, after measuring the pressure drop during a steady-state regime, for example, in a tubular air preheater as the heat surface that is less susceptible to contamination from particle laden gas flow, and at the same time calculating the fuel mass flow rate through an indirect heat balance, the two parameters can be interrelated. The semi-empirical relationship obtained in this way can then be used for determining the actual fuel mass flow rate during transient boiler loads. The proposed method was used to determine the technical and economical characteristics of a pulverized combustion power unit utilizing oil-shale. Large-scale experiments were conducted in a high-pressure pulverized combustion steam generator TP-101, with a rated capacity of 300 MWth. The dual-boiler unit load ramping was constrained to 2.5 MWel/min. The results show that during ramping down the load to 50% maximum continuous rating, the mean fuel consumption decreased by 10%, and during ramp-up back to 100% maximum continuous rating, the mean fuel consumption increased by 14%. The total increase in fuel consumption during ramping cycle at given conditions, was approximately 4%.

Suggested Citation

  • Neshumayev, Dmitri & Rummel, Leo & Konist, Alar & Ots, Arvo & Parve, Teet, 2018. "Power plant fuel consumption rate during load cycling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 124-135.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:224:y:2018:i:c:p:124-135
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626191830624X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oree, Vishwamitra & Sayed Hassen, Sayed Z., 2016. "A composite metric for assessing flexibility available in conventional generators of power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 683-691.
    2. Alobaid, Falah & Postler, Ralf & Ströhle, Jochen & Epple, Bernd & Kim, Hyun-Gee, 2008. "Modeling and investigation start-up procedures of a combined cycle power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(12), pages 1173-1189, December.
    3. Wang, Ligang & Yang, Yongping & Dong, Changqing & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2014. "Multi-objective optimization of coal-fired power plants using differential evolution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 254-264.
    4. Mikulandrić, Robert & Lončar, Dražen & Cvetinović, Dejan & Spiridon, Gabriel, 2013. "Improvement of existing coal fired thermal power plants performance by control systems modifications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 55-65.
    5. Smrekar, J. & Assadi, M. & Fast, M. & Kuštrin, I. & De, S., 2009. "Development of artificial neural network model for a coal-fired boiler using real plant data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 144-152.
    6. Mikkola, Jani & Lund, Peter D., 2016. "Modeling flexibility and optimal use of existing power plants with large-scale variable renewable power schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 364-375.
    7. Mertens, Nicolas & Alobaid, Falah & Starkloff, Ralf & Epple, Bernd & Kim, Hyun-Gee, 2015. "Comparative investigation of drum-type and once-through heat recovery steam generator during start-up," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 250-260.
    8. Kubik, M.L. & Coker, P.J. & Barlow, J.F., 2015. "Increasing thermal plant flexibility in a high renewables power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 102-111.
    9. Keatley, P. & Shibli, A. & Hewitt, N.J., 2013. "Estimating power plant start costs in cyclic operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 550-557.
    10. Alobaid, Falah & Ströhle, Jochen & Epple, Bernd & Kim, Hyun-Gee, 2009. "Dynamic simulation of a supercritical once-through heat recovery steam generator during load changes and start-up procedures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(7-8), pages 1274-1282, July.
    11. Göransson, Lisa & Goop, Joel & Odenberger, Mikael & Johnsson, Filip, 2017. "Impact of thermal plant cycling on the cost-optimal composition of a regional electricity generation system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 230-240.
    12. Turconi, R. & O’Dwyer, C. & Flynn, D. & Astrup, T., 2014. "Emissions from cycling of thermal power plants in electricity systems with high penetration of wind power: Life cycle assessment for Ireland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1-8.
    13. Eser, Patrick & Singh, Antriksh & Chokani, Ndaona & Abhari, Reza S., 2016. "Effect of increased renewables generation on operation of thermal power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 723-732.
    14. Wang, Chaoyang & Liu, Ming & Li, Bingxin & Liu, Yiwen & Yan, Junjie, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis on the transient cycling of coal-fired power plants: Simulation study of a 660 MW supercritical unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 505-527.
    15. Benato, A. & Bracco, S. & Stoppato, A. & Mirandola, A., 2016. "LTE: A procedure to predict power plants dynamic behaviour and components lifetime reduction during transient operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 880-891.
    16. Taler, Jan & Dzierwa, Piotr & Taler, Dawid & Harchut, Piotr, 2015. "Optimization of the boiler start-up taking into account thermal stresses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P1), pages 160-170.
    17. Brouwer, Anne Sjoerd & van den Broek, Machteld & Seebregts, Ad & Faaij, André, 2015. "Operational flexibility and economics of power plants in future low-carbon power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 107-128.
    18. Liu, Ji-Zhen & Yan, Shu & Zeng, De-Liang & Hu, Yong & Lv, You, 2015. "A dynamic model used for controller design of a coal fired once-through boiler-turbine unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2069-2078.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lauri Loo & Alar Konist & Dmitri Neshumayev & Tõnu Pihu & Birgit Maaten & Andres Siirde, 2018. "Ash and Flue Gas from Oil Shale Oxy-Fuel Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Liu, Kairui & Wang, Chao & Wang, Limin & Liu, Bin & Ye, Maojing & Guo, Yalong & Che, Defu, 2023. "Dynamic performance analysis and control strategy optimization for supercritical coal-fired boiler: A dynamic simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    3. Ioannis Avagianos & Dimitrios Rakopoulos & Sotirios Karellas & Emmanouil Kakaras, 2020. "Review of Process Modeling of Solid-Fuel Thermal Power Plants for Flexible and Off-Design Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-41, December.
    4. Wang, Chaoyang & Qiao, Yongqiang & Liu, Ming & Zhao, Yongliang & Yan, Junjie, 2020. "Enhancing peak shaving capability by optimizing reheat-steam temperature control of a double-reheat boiler," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    5. Wang, Zhu & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie, 2021. "Flexibility and efficiency co-enhancement of thermal power plant by control strategy improvement considering time varying and detailed boiler heat storage characteristics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    6. Wang, Xuebin & Chang, Jianxia & Meng, Xuejiao & Wang, Yimin, 2018. "Short-term hydro-thermal-wind-photovoltaic complementary operation of interconnected power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 945-962.
    7. Yan, Hui & Liu, Ming & Wang, Zhu & Zhang, Kezhen & Chong, Daotong & Yan, Junjie, 2023. "Flexibility enhancement of solar-aided coal-fired power plant under different direct normal irradiance conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    8. Zhang, Xinshuo & Huang, Weibin & Chen, Shijun & Xie, Diya & Liu, Dexu & Ma, Guangwen, 2020. "Grid–source coordinated dispatching based on heterogeneous energy hybrid power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Yongliang & Wang, Chaoyang & Liu, Ming & Chong, Daotong & Yan, Junjie, 2018. "Improving operational flexibility by regulating extraction steam of high-pressure heaters on a 660 MW supercritical coal-fired power plant: A dynamic simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1295-1309.
    2. Beiron, Johanna & Montañés, Rubén M. & Normann, Fredrik & Johnsson, Filip, 2020. "Flexible operation of a combined cycle cogeneration plant – A techno-economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    3. Saleh Abujarad & Mohd Wazir Mustafa & Jasrul Jamani Jamian & Abdirahman M. Abdilahi & Jeroen D. M. De Kooning & Jan Desmet & Lieven Vandevelde, 2020. "An Adjusted Weight Metric to Quantify Flexibility Available in Conventional Generators for Low Carbon Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Romero-Anton, N. & Martin-Escudero, K. & Portillo-Valdés, L.A. & Gómez-Elvira, I. & Salazar-Herran, E., 2018. "Improvement of auxiliary BI-DRUM boiler operation by dynamic simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 676-686.
    5. Rossi, Iacopo & Sorce, Alessandro & Traverso, Alberto, 2017. "Gas turbine combined cycle start-up and stress evaluation: A simplified dynamic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 880-890.
    6. Garðarsdóttir, Stefanía Ó. & Göransson, Lisa & Normann, Fredrik & Johnsson, Filip, 2018. "Improving the flexibility of coal-fired power generators: Impact on the composition of a cost-optimal electricity system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 277-289.
    7. Ioannis Avagianos & Dimitrios Rakopoulos & Sotirios Karellas & Emmanouil Kakaras, 2020. "Review of Process Modeling of Solid-Fuel Thermal Power Plants for Flexible and Off-Design Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-41, December.
    8. Wang, Chaoyang & Liu, Ming & Li, Bingxin & Liu, Yiwen & Yan, Junjie, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis on the transient cycling of coal-fired power plants: Simulation study of a 660 MW supercritical unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 505-527.
    9. Benato, A. & Bracco, S. & Stoppato, A. & Mirandola, A., 2016. "LTE: A procedure to predict power plants dynamic behaviour and components lifetime reduction during transient operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 880-891.
    10. Akpan, P.U. & Fuls, W.F., 2021. "Cycling of coal fired power plants: A generic CO2 emissions factor model for predicting CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    11. Eser, Patrick & Singh, Antriksh & Chokani, Ndaona & Abhari, Reza S., 2016. "Effect of increased renewables generation on operation of thermal power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 723-732.
    12. Oree, Vishwamitra & Sayed Hassen, Sayed Z., 2016. "A composite metric for assessing flexibility available in conventional generators of power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 683-691.
    13. Al-Momani, Ahmad & Mohamed, Omar & Abu Elhaija, Wejdan, 2022. "Multiple processes modeling and identification for a cleaner supercritical power plant via Grey Wolf Optimizer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    14. Omar Mohamed & Ashraf Khalil & Jihong Wang, 2020. "Modeling and Control of Supercritical and Ultra-Supercritical Power Plants: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    15. Heydarian-Forushani, E. & Golshan, M.E.H. & Siano, Pierluigi, 2017. "Evaluating the benefits of coordinated emerging flexible resources in electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 142-154.
    16. Hiyam Farhat & Coriolano Salvini, 2022. "Novel Gas Turbine Challenges to Support the Clean Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    17. Wang, Di & Zhou, Yunlong & Li, Xiaoli, 2018. "A dynamic model used for controller design for fast cut back of coal-fired boiler-turbine plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 526-534.
    18. Chang-Gi Min & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2017. "Net Load Carrying Capability of Generating Units in Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    19. Hao Zhang & Xiangjie Liu & Xiaobing Kong & Kwang Y. Lee, 2019. "Stacked Auto-Encoder Modeling of an Ultra-Supercritical Boiler-Turbine System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-14, October.
    20. de Mars, Patrick & O’Sullivan, Aidan & Keppo, Ilkka, 2020. "Estimating the impact of variable renewable energy on base-load cycling in the GB power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:224:y:2018:i:c:p:124-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.