IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i11p2977-d559182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Small Hydropower Generation Potential: (1) Estimation of the Potential in Ungaged Basins

Author

Listed:
  • Sungeun Jung

    (Division of Computer Science and Engineering, Sahmyook University, Seoul 01795, Korea)

  • Younghye Bae

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Jongsung Kim

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Hongjun Joo

    (Construction Technology Safety Department, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Ilsan 10223, Korea)

  • Hung Soo Kim

    (Construction Technology Safety Department, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Ilsan 10223, Korea)

  • Jaewon Jung

    (Institute of Water Resources System, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea)

Abstract

Small hydropower (SHP) plants are advantageous as they have a short construction period and can be easily maintained. They also have a higher energy density than other alternative energy sources as environmentally-friendly energy sources. In general, hydropower potential is estimated based on the discharge in the river basin, and the discharge can be obtained from the stage station in the gaged basin. However, if there is no station (i.e., ungaged basin) or no sufficient discharge data, the discharge should be estimated based on rainfall data. The flow duration characteristic model is the most widely used method for the estimation of mean annual discharge because of its simplicity and it consists of rainfall, basin area, and runoff coefficient. Due to the characteristics of hydroelectric power depending on the discharge, there is a limit to guaranteeing the accuracy of estimating the generated power with only one method of the flow duration characteristic model. Therefore, this study assumes the gaged basins of the three hydropower plants of Deoksong, Hanseok, and Socheon in Korea exist as ungaged basins and the river discharges were simulated using the Kajiyama formula, modified-TPM(Two-Parameter Monthly) model, and Tank model for a comparison with the flow duration characteristics model. Furthermore, to minimize the uncertainty of the simulated discharge, four blending techniques of simple average method, MMSE(Multi-Model Super Ensemble), SMA(Simple Model Average), and MSE(Mean Square Error) were applied. As for the results, the obtained discharges from the four models were compared with the observed discharge and we noted that the discharges by the Kajiyama formula and modified-TPM model were better fitted with the observations than the discharge by the flow duration characteristics model. However, the result by the Tank model was not well fitted with the observation. Additionally, when we investigated the four blending techniques, we concluded that the MSE technique was the most appropriate for the discharge simulation of the ungaged basin. This study proposed a methodology to estimate power generation potential more accurately by applying discharge simulation models that have not been previously applied to the estimation of SHP potential and blending techniques were also used to minimize the uncertainty of the simulated discharge. The methodology proposed in this study is expected to be applicable for the estimation of SHP potential in ungaged basins.

Suggested Citation

  • Sungeun Jung & Younghye Bae & Jongsung Kim & Hongjun Joo & Hung Soo Kim & Jaewon Jung, 2021. "Analysis of Small Hydropower Generation Potential: (1) Estimation of the Potential in Ungaged Basins," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:2977-:d:559182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/11/2977/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/11/2977/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Byman H. Hamududu & Ånund Killingtveit, 2016. "Hydropower Production in Future Climate Scenarios; the Case for the Zambezi River," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Kusre, B.C. & Baruah, D.C. & Bordoloi, P.K. & Patra, S.C., 2010. "Assessment of hydropower potential using GIS and hydrological modeling technique in Kopili River basin in Assam (India)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 298-309, January.
    3. Larentis, Dante G. & Collischonn, Walter & Olivera, Francisco & Tucci, Carlos E.M., 2010. "Gis-based procedures for hydropower potential spotting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4237-4243.
    4. Byman H. Hamududu & Ånund Killingtveit, 2016. "Hydropower Production in Future Climate Scenarios: The Case for Kwanza River, Angola," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Chilkoti, Vinod & Bolisetti, Tirupati & Balachandar, Ram, 2017. "Climate change impact assessment on hydropower generation using multi-model climate ensemble," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 510-517.
    6. Frey, Gary W. & Linke, Deborah M., 2002. "Hydropower as a renewable and sustainable energy resource meeting global energy challenges in a reasonable way," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(14), pages 1261-1265, November.
    7. Pablo E. Carvajal & Gabrial Anandarajah & Yacob Mulugetta & Olivier Dessens, 2017. "Assessing uncertainty of climate change impacts on long-term hydropower generation using the CMIP5 ensemble—the case of Ecuador," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 144(4), pages 611-624, October.
    8. Pedro Arriagada & Bastien Dieppois & Moussa Sidibe & Oscar Link, 2019. "Impacts of Climate Change and Climate Variability on Hydropower Potential in Data-Scarce Regions Subjected to Multi-Decadal Variability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Andrzej Kokiel & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Anna Sobczak & Dariusz Soboń & Jacek Stasiak, 2022. "Hydropower in the Energy Market in Poland and the Baltic States in the Light of the Challenges of Sustainable Development-An Overview of the Current State and Development Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Jaewon Jung & Sungeun Jung & Junhyeong Lee & Myungjin Lee & Hung Soo Kim, 2021. "Analysis of Small Hydropower Generation Potential: (2) Future Prospect of the Potential under Climate Change," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, May.
    3. Arthur Henrique de Andrade Melani & Miguel Angelo de Carvalho Michalski & Carlos Alberto Murad & Adherbal Caminada Netto & Gilberto Francisco Martha de Souza, 2022. "Generalized Stochastic Petri Nets for Planning and Optimizing Maintenance Logistics of Small Hydroelectric Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaewon Jung & Sungeun Jung & Junhyeong Lee & Myungjin Lee & Hung Soo Kim, 2021. "Analysis of Small Hydropower Generation Potential: (2) Future Prospect of the Potential under Climate Change," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Jaewon Jung & Heechan Han & Kyunghun Kim & Hung Soo Kim, 2021. "Machine Learning-Based Small Hydropower Potential Prediction under Climate Change," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-10, June.
    3. Pedro Arriagada & Bastien Dieppois & Moussa Sidibe & Oscar Link, 2019. "Impacts of Climate Change and Climate Variability on Hydropower Potential in Data-Scarce Regions Subjected to Multi-Decadal Variability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Kelly-Richards, Sarah & Silber-Coats, Noah & Crootof, Arica & Tecklin, David & Bauer, Carl, 2017. "Governing the transition to renewable energy: A review of impacts and policy issues in the small hydropower boom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 251-264.
    5. Bekker, A. & Van Dijk, M. & Niebuhr, C.M., 2022. "A review of low head hydropower at wastewater treatment works and development of an evaluation framework for South Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. Paweł Tomczyk & Mirosław Wiatkowski, 2021. "The Effects of Hydropower Plants on the Physicochemical Parameters of the Bystrzyca River in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-29, April.
    7. Dulias Renata, 2022. "Anthropogenic and natural factors influencing African World Heritage sites," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 10(3), pages 67-84, September.
    8. Zhang, Yi & Cheng, Chuntian & Yang, Tiantian & Jin, Xiaoyu & Jia, Zebin & Shen, Jianjian & Wu, Xinyu, 2022. "Assessment of climate change impacts on the hydro-wind-solar energy supply system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    9. Rogeau, A. & Girard, R. & Kariniotakis, G., 2017. "A generic GIS-based method for small Pumped Hydro Energy Storage (PHES) potential evaluation at large scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 241-253.
    10. Gerardo Alcalá & Luis Fernando Grisales-Noreña & Quetzalcoatl Hernandez-Escobedo & Jose Javier Muñoz-Criollo & J. D. Revuelta-Acosta, 2021. "SHP Assessment for a Run-of-River (RoR) Scheme Using a Rectangular Mesh Sweeping Approach (MSA) Based on GIS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Operacz, Agnieszka, 2017. "The term “effective hydropower potential” based on sustainable development – an initial case study of the Raba river in Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1453-1463.
    12. J. Restrepo-Trujillo & Ricardo Moreno-Chuquen & Francy Nelly Jim nez-Garc a, 2020. "Strategies of Expansion for Electric Power Systems Based on Hydroelectric Plants in the Context of Climate Change: Case of Analysis of Colombia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 66-74.
    13. Izadyar, Nima & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Chong, W.T. & Leong, K.Y., 2016. "Resource assessment of the renewable energy potential for a remote area: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 908-923.
    14. Müller, Marc F. & Thompson, Sally E. & Kelly, Maggi N., 2016. "Bridging the information gap: A webGIS tool for rural electrification in data-scarce regions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 277-286.
    15. Zhong, Ruida & Zhao, Tongtiegang & He, Yanhu & Chen, Xiaohong, 2019. "Hydropower change of the water tower of Asia in 21st century: A case of the Lancang River hydropower base, upper Mekong," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 685-696.
    16. Anita Kwartnik-Pruc & Aneta Mączyńska, 2022. "Assessing Validity of Employing Surveying Methods to Capture Data on Topography to Determine Hydrological and Topographic Parameters Essential for Selecting Locations for the Construction of Small Hyd," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-41, February.
    17. Byman H. Hamududu & Hambulo Ngoma, 2020. "Impacts of climate change on water resources availability in Zambia: implications for irrigation development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 2817-2838, April.
    18. Changjun Wang & Shutong Chen, 2019. "Planning of Cascade Hydropower Stations with the Consideration of Long-Term Operations under Uncertainties," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-23, November.
    19. Soulis, Konstantinos X. & Manolakos, Dimitris & Anagnostopoulos, John & Papantonis, Dimitris, 2016. "Development of a geo-information system embedding a spatially distributed hydrological model for the preliminary assessment of the hydropower potential of historical hydro sites in poorly gauged areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 222-232.
    20. Katarzyna Kubiak-Wójcicka & Leszek Szczęch, 2021. "Dynamics of Electricity Production against the Backdrop of Climate Change: A Case Study of Hydropower Plants in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:2977-:d:559182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.