IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2020i1p66-d468110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taxonomic Binning Approaches and Functional Characteristics of the Microbial Community during the Anaerobic Digestion of Hydrolyzed Corncob

Author

Listed:
  • Luz Breton-Deval

    (Catedras Conacyt, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca 62210, Mexico)

  • Ilse Salinas-Peralta

    (Catedras Conacyt, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca 62210, Mexico)

  • Jaime Santiago Alarcón Aguirre

    (Department of Water and Energy, University of Guadalajara Campus Tonalá, Tonalá 45425, Mexico)

  • Belkis Sulbarán-Rangel

    (Department of Water and Energy, University of Guadalajara Campus Tonalá, Tonalá 45425, Mexico)

  • Kelly Joel Gurubel Tun

    (Department of Water and Energy, University of Guadalajara Campus Tonalá, Tonalá 45425, Mexico)

Abstract

Maize forms the basis of Mexican food. As a result, approximately six million tons of corncob are produced each year, which represents an environmental issue, as well as a potential feedstock for biogas production. This research aimed to analyze the taxonomic and functional shift in the microbiome of the fermenters using a whole metagenome shotgun approach. Two strategies were used to understand the microbial community at the beginning and the end of anaerobic digestion: (i) phylogenetic analysis to infer the presence and coverage of clade-specific markers to assign taxonomy and (ii) the recovery of the individual genomes from the samples using the binning of the assembled scaffolds. The results showed that anaerobic digestion brought some noticeable changes and the main microbial community was composed of Corynebacterium variable , Desulfovibrio desulfuricans , Vibrio furnissii , Shewanella spp., Actinoplanes spp., Pseudoxanthomonas spp., Saccharomonospora azurea , Agromyces spp., Serinicoccus spp., Cellulomonas spp., Pseudonocardia spp., Rhodococcus rhodochrous , Sphingobacterium spp. Methanosarcina mazei , Methanoculleus hydrogenitrophicus , Methanosphaerula spp., Methanoregula spp., Methanosaeta spp. and Methanospirillum spp. This study provides evidence of the drastic change in the microbial community structure in a short time and the functional strategy that the most representative microorganisms of the consortia used to carry out the process.

Suggested Citation

  • Luz Breton-Deval & Ilse Salinas-Peralta & Jaime Santiago Alarcón Aguirre & Belkis Sulbarán-Rangel & Kelly Joel Gurubel Tun, 2020. "Taxonomic Binning Approaches and Functional Characteristics of the Microbial Community during the Anaerobic Digestion of Hydrolyzed Corncob," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:66-:d:468110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/1/66/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/1/66/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsapekos, P. & Kougias, P.G. & Treu, L. & Campanaro, S. & Angelidaki, I., 2017. "Process performance and comparative metagenomic analysis during co-digestion of manure and lignocellulosic biomass for biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 126-135.
    2. Solmaz Aslanzadeh & Karthik Rajendran & Azam Jeihanipour & Mohammad J. Taherzadeh, 2013. "The Effect of Effluent Recirculation in a Semi-Continuous Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Sivagurunathan, Periyasamy & Kumar, Gopalakrishnan & Mudhoo, Ackmez & Rene, Eldon R. & Saratale, Ganesh Dattatraya & Kobayashi, Takuro & Xu, Kaiqin & Kim, Sang-Hyoun & Kim, Dong-Hoon, 2017. "Fermentative hydrogen production using lignocellulose biomass: An overview of pre-treatment methods, inhibitor effects and detoxification experiences," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 28-42.
    4. Pérez-Rodríguez, N. & García-Bernet, D. & Domínguez, J.M., 2017. "Extrusion and enzymatic hydrolysis as pretreatments on corn cob for biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 597-603.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luz, Fábio Codignole & Cordiner, Stefano & Manni, Alessandro & Mulone, Vincenzo & Rocco, Vittorio, 2017. "Anaerobic digestion of coffee grounds soluble fraction at laboratory scale: Evaluation of the biomethane potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 166-175.
    2. Yang, Guang & Wang, Jianlong, 2018. "Various additives for improving dark fermentative hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 130-146.
    3. Notodarmojo, Peni Astrini & Fujiwara, Takeshi & Habuer, & Pham Van, Dinh, 2022. "Effectiveness of oyster shell as alkali additive for two-stage anaerobic co-digestion: Carbon flow analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    4. Łukajtis, Rafał & Hołowacz, Iwona & Kucharska, Karolina & Glinka, Marta & Rybarczyk, Piotr & Przyjazny, Andrzej & Kamiński, Marian, 2018. "Hydrogen production from biomass using dark fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 665-694.
    5. Frauke P. C. Müller & Gerd-Christian Maack & Wolfgang Buescher, 2017. "Effects of Biogas Substrate Recirculation on Methane Yield and Efficiency of a Liquid-Manure-Based Biogas Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, March.
    6. Singh, Neeraj Kumar & Singh, Rajesh, 2022. "Co-factors applicability in hydrogen production from rice straw hydrolysate in a bioelectrochemical system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    7. Theresa Menzel & Peter Neubauer & Stefan Junne, 2020. "Role of Microbial Hydrolysis in Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-29, October.
    8. Shao, Weilan & Wang, Qiang & Rupani, Parveen Fatemeh & Krishnan, Santhana & Ahmad, Fiaz & Rezania, Shahabaldin & Rashid, Muhammad Adnan & Sha, Chong & Md Din, Mohd Fadhil, 2020. "Biohydrogen production via thermophilic fermentation: A prospective application of Thermotoga species," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    9. Azad Pashaki, Saeed Ghanbari & Khojastehpour, Mehdi & Ebrahimi-Nik, Mohammadali & Rohani, Abbas, 2021. "Treatment of municipal landfill leachate: Optimization of organic loading rate in a two-stage CSTR followed by aerobic degradation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1210-1221.
    10. Karim, Ahasanul & Islam, M. Amirul & Mishra, Puranjan & Yousuf, Abu & Faizal, Che Ku Mohammad & Khan, Md. Maksudur Rahman, 2021. "Technical difficulties of mixed culture driven waste biomass-based biohydrogen production: Sustainability of current pretreatment techniques and future prospective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    11. Przemysław Liczbiński & Sebastian Borowski, 2021. "Co-Digestion of Kitchen Waste with Grass and Leaves after Hyperthermophilic Pretreatment for Methane and Hydrogen Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-9, September.
    12. René Heller & Christina Brandhorst & Benedikt Hülsemann & Andreas Lemmer & Hans Oechsner, 2023. "Comparison of Different Mechanical Pretreatment Methods for the Anaerobic Digestion of Landscape Management Grass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-26, December.
    13. Hu, Bin-Bin & Wang, Ji-Lian & Wang, Yu-Tao & Zhu, Ming-Jun, 2019. "Specify the individual and synergistic effects of lignocellulose-derived inhibitors on biohydrogen production and inhibitory mechanism research," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 397-406.
    14. Yang, Ziyi & Sun, Hangyu & Kurbonova, Malikakhon & Zhou, Ling & Arhin, Samuel Gyebi & Papadakis, Vagelis G. & Goula, Maria A. & Liu, Guangqing & Zhang, Yi & Wang, Wen, 2022. "Simultaneous supplementation of magnetite and polyurethane foam carrier can reach a Pareto-optimal point to alleviate ammonia inhibition during anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 104-116.
    15. Zhou, Jialiang & Zhang, Yuanhui & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Duan, Na, 2021. "Meta-analysis of anaerobic co-digestion of livestock manure in last decade: Identification of synergistic effect and optimization synergy range," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    16. Neshat, Soheil A. & Mohammadi, Maedeh & Najafpour, Ghasem D. & Lahijani, Pooya, 2017. "Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manures and lignocellulosic residues as a potent approach for sustainable biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 308-322.
    17. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Wainaina, Steven & Rajendran, Karthik & Kumar, Sumit & Quan, Wang & Duan, Yumin & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Chen, Hongyu & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang , 2019. "A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 115-131.
    18. Lucas van der Maas & Jasper L. S. P. Driessen & Solange I. Mussatto, 2021. "Effects of Inhibitory Compounds Present in Lignocellulosic Biomass Hydrolysates on the Growth of Bacillus subtilis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    20. Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Valijanian, Elena & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Ghanavati, Hossein & Sulaiman, Alawi & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Karimi, Keikhosr, 2020. "A comprehensive review on recent biological innovations to improve biogas production, Part 1: Upstream strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1204-1220.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:66-:d:468110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.